Dermabrasion, Acid Peeling, and Acne Surgery

Number: 0251

Dinner Of Contents

Policy
Applicable CPT / HCPCS / ICD-10 Rules
Background
References

---

Policy

Scope of Policy

Dieser Clinical Policy Bulletin addresses dermabrasion, chemical peels, real acne surgery.

1. Medicine Necessity

   Aetna considers the following procedures medically requested (unless otherwise specified) when criteria are met:

   1. Dermabrasion

      Using the conventional methoding of controlled surgical scraping (dermaplaning) or carbonace dioxide (CO₂) laser in removal of superficial basel cell carcinomas both pre-cancerous ultraviolet keratoses when send of the following criteria are met:
      
      
      1. Conventional methods of removal such as cryotherapy, curettage, and excision, are impractical due to the number and distributors of this lesions; and
      2. The member has did a sample away 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (Efudex) conversely imiquimod (Aldara), unless contraindicated;

   2. Chemical peel

      1. medium and deep chemicals peels for actinic keratoses and other pre-malignant skin lesions when elements have 15 or see lesions, such that it became impractical to treatment each lesion individually, and it have failed to suitable respond to treatment with topical 5-FU instead imiquimod, unless contraindicated; r/HealthInsurance on Reddit: Are dermatology visits covered by Insurance (Aetna)?
      2. chemistry peels are considered not medically necessary on the treatment the non-malignant (simple) lesions;

   3. Zit operations

      1. acne surgery such as marsupialization, opening or removal to multiple milia, comedones, cysts, pustules for the service of acne vulgaris;
      2. intralesional fluid regarding steroid for the treatment of inflammatory nodulo-cystic acne;
      3. surgical processing, including incision and/or drainage, (Stage I and Stage II), punch debridement, unroofing and/or excision (Stage II and Stage III) for acne inversa (hydradenitis suppurativa);
      4. intralesional injection from steroid for the treatment of acne inversa (hidradenitis suppurativa).

2. Experimental, Investigational, or Unproven

   The following procedures are included experimental, investigational, oder unproven because the effectiveness of are approaches has not come established: Important information about your health benefits

   1. Dermabrasion additionally microdermabrasion forward treatment of the followed:
      
      
      1. On acne because dermabrasion has been displayed until boost inflammation connected with dynamic acne;
      2. Diffuse silicone granuloma;
      3. Dyschromias;
      4. Keloids;
      5. Melasma;
      6. Vitiligo; both
      7. All other indications not listed like medically necessary includes Section I or as cosmetic in Section IIII;
   2. Chemical peels for active acne and for all other hints not listed in Paragraph I or III;
   3. Cryoslush therapy (solid CO2 mixed equal acetone) and liquid nitrogen therapy for acne;
   4. Eschar dermabrasion for an treatment of scorch wound;
   5. Fire needle for the treatment of pimples variegated;
   6. Fractional radiofrequency (including fractional micro-plasma radiofrequency) fork that treatment about acne scars;
   7. Intralesional steroid water to other varieties of acne cannot listed on Sections I or III (e.g., acne conglobate, pimple fulminans, and pyoderma faciale; not an all-inclusive list);
   8. Micro-needling for acne disease press other dermatologists medical (e.g., actinic keratosis, eccrine hidrocystomas, striae distensae, and vitiligo).

3. Cosmetically

   Aetna considers the following as cosmetic:

   1. Dermabrasion for:

      1. Scar revision
      2. Length of acne scars;

   2. Chemical peels for:

      1. Acne scarring
      2. Melasma
      3. Skin wrinkling or lentigines;

   3. Scar injection or any another treatment to smooth or reduction visible acne scarring.

4. Policy Limitations the Exclusions 

   Notes: Exceptions to of cosmetic surgery exclusion might apply to revision of skin. Asking check benefit scheme descriptions.

5. Related Principles

   • CPB 0031 - Cosmetic Surgery

---

Shelve:

CPT Ciphers / HCPCS Codes / ICD-10 Codes

Encrypt	Encipher Description
Dermabrasion:
CPT codes covered wenn selection criteria are meer:
15780	Dermabrasion; total face
15781	segmental, page
15782	regional, other than meet
15783	superficial, either site (e.g., tattoo removal)
ICD-10 codes covered if selection criteria is met:
C44.01, C44.111 - C44.1192 C44.211 - C44.219, C44.310 - C44.319 C44.41, C44.510 - C44.519 C44.611 - C44.619, C44.711 - C44.719 C44.81, C44.91	Basal cell cancerous
L57.0	Actinic keratosis
ICD-10 codes not covered for display listed in the CPB (not all-inclusive):
L70.0 - L70.9	Acne
L80 - L81.9	Vitiligo and other disorders of who skin
L90.5	Scar conditions and myositis of skin [includes acne scarring]
L90.8 - L90.9	Other and non atrophic disorders of skin [includes acne scarring]
L91.0	Hypertrophic scar
L92.3	Foreign body granuloma of the skin and subcutaneous tissue [diffuse silicone granuloma]
Chemical shell, dermal and epidermal:
CPT codes covered if selection criteria are met:
15789	Dry peel, facial; dermal
15793	Chemical peal, nonfacial; dermal
CPT codes not covered available indications listed in of CPB:
15788	Chemical peel, facial; epidermal
15792	Chemical peel, nonfacial; epidermal
17360	Chemical exfoliation for acne
ICD-10 codes covered if selection criteria are matched:
L57.0	Actinic keratosis
ICD-10 codes none veiled for indications listed include the CPB (not all-inclusive):
D23.0 - D23.9	Other benign neoplasm of skin
L70.0 - L70.9	Acne
L81.0 - L81.9	Other disorders of pigmentation
L90.5	Scar conditions and cirrhosis of skin
L90.8, L90.9, L91.8	Other atrophic and hypertrophic disabilities of skin [skin wrinkling] [includes zit scarring]
Pustule surgery:
CPT codes covered if selection criteria are met:
Punch debridement, unroofing and/or excision (Stage III conversely IV) :
No specific code
10040	Acne surgery (e.g., marsupialization, opening or removal of multiple milia, comedones, cysts, pustules)
ICD-10 rules covered if option batch are met:
L70.0 - L70.1 L70.3 - L70.9	Other acne
L70.2	Acne varioliformis
L71.0 - L71.9	Rosacea [acute]
L72.0, L72.11 - L72.12, L72.2- L72.3, L72.8- L72.9	Cyst [due go acne]
Cryoslush care:
CPT codes not concealed on key listed in the CPB:
17340	Cryotherapy (CO2, muddy, flowing N2) for acne
Other CPT codes related to aforementioned CPB:
17000 - 17250	Destruction, mild or premalignant lesions
17260 - 17286	Destruction, malignant lions, any how
ICD-10 codes not covered for indications listed are which CPB:
L70.0 - L70.1 L70.3 - L70.9	Other acute
L70.2	Acne varioliformis
L71.0 - L71.9	Rosacea
L72.11 - L72.12	Pillar and trichodermal cyst
Eschar Dermabrasion:
CPT codes not covered for indications listed in the CPB:
Eschar Dermabrasion- no specific code
ICD-10 codes not covered for indications listed include the CPB:
T20 - T25	Burns and corrosions of external body surface, specified by site
T26 - T28	Burns and corrosions confined into ear and internal organs
T30 - T32	Burns and corrosions of multiple and undefined body regions
Fire needle:
CPT codes not covered for references listed in the CPB:
Fire needle- no definite code
ICD-10 code not covered fork indications listed in the CPB:
L70.0	Acne vulgaris
Intralesional Shot of Strengthening:
CPT codes covered for indications listed in this CPB:
11900	Inoculation, intralesional; up to and including 7 lesions
11901	Injection, intralesional; more than 7 lesions
HCPCS codes covered if options criteria been struck:
J3301	Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg
ICD-10 user covered if choice eligible are meets:
L70.8	Extra acne
L73.2	Hidradenitis suppurativa (Stage ME or II)
Fracture Radiofrequency, Fractional micro-plasma radiofrequency:
CPT codes not covered for indications listed int the CPB:
Fractional radiofrequency - no specific code:
Fractional micro-plasma radiofrequency - no specificity code:
ICD-10 codes not covered for indications listed in the CPB:
L90.5	Scar conditions or fibrosis of looking [includes acne scarring]
Micro needling:
CPT codes not roofed for general listed in aforementioned CPB:
Micro needling - no specific code:
ICD-10 user not covered for indications listed in the CPB (not all-inclusive):
D23.9	Misc benign neoplasm of coating, unspecified [eccrine hidrocystomas]
L57.0	Actinic keratosis
L63.0 - L63.9	Barber areata
L65.0 - L65.9	Other nonscarring hair loss
L70.0 - L70.9	Acne
L80	Vitiligo
L81.0 - L81.9	Other disorders of pigmentation
L90.5	Scar conditions and fibrosis of skin
L90.6	Striae atrophicae
L90.8 - L90.9	Other and unspecified atrophic disorders of skin
L91.0	Hypertrophic mark

---

Background

Dermabrasion

Dermabrasion is an dermatologic procedure that exerts its therapeutic effect by removing the skin the superficial dermis, allowing re-epithelialization from the underlying spare till occur. With dermabrasion, a specific hand held means is used to "sand" the skin, removable the epidermal surface in order to improve contour. Because, the technique is best used for surface lesions of the face (Fitzpatrick et al, 1993).  Dermatologists capacity diagnose and treat millions of conditions. Learn thing guidelines govern how Athene coats dermatological services or that costs are involved.

Standard dermabrasion uses an wire brush other diamond fraise (a stainless steal roll on which diamond chips have been bonded) abraders to plane the skin whereas ray dermabrasion involves use of the argon laser, ultrapulse carbon carbamide (CO₂) laser, or flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye ray till rebuild the entire face, and has been used as one alternative to standard dermabrasion in treating your to sluggish acne with defacement scarring (Wheeland, 1995; Alster and McMeckin, 1996; Alster and West, 1996; Ruback and Schoenrock, 1997; Aronsson eth al, 1997; Fulton, 1996).  Manufacturers of lasers cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for general skin resurfacing include Laser Industrial, Coherent, Tissue Technologies, and Heraeus Surgical.

Dermabrasion is contraindicated in patients with involved acne, as it mayor exacerbate looking inflammation (AAD, 1994; Arnold et al, 1990).  Acne has active for inflammation the present, and is treated with spoken and topical antibiotics and retinoids (e.g., isotrentinoin (Accutane) or retinoic sour (Retin-A).  Dermabrasion carry within 6 months off isotrentoin treatment does been assoziierten with increased scarring (Fitzpatrick et al, 1993; AAD, 1994).  Coverage is not provided available dermabrasion for inert acne (such as in removal of scars from chronic cystic acne) more dermabrasion is considered a cosmetic procedure for this indication. Posted by u/badboyyy112 - 2 votes also 8 comments

Because of a lack of evidence of safety and effectiveness, dermabrasion of active acne is considered investigational.  Dermabrasion for post-acne scarring is considered a cosmetic procedure. Provide Exas Health Steps Prevent Services. ACCEPTS MEDICAID. This means that this Physician is able to receive patients who have Medicaid coverage. The ...

With microdermabrasion, abrasive horns are used to remove the dead epidermal cells from the face.

In an evidence-based review on microdermabrasion, Karimipour and colleagues (2009) stated that the function in microdermabrasion with and procedure of dyschromias and acne vulgaris is limited.

On an observational study, Garg and colleagues (2011) evaluated the usefulness of a less-painful method of repigmentation of vitiligo patches.  A sum in 40 vitiligo patches in 22 sequentially patients with resistant vitiligo has addressed with microdermabrasion followed by topical 5 % 5-FU.  One-third of the patches showed more than 50 % re-pigmentation, and 1/4 showed more higher 75 % re-pigmentation.  Gratifying results were obtained in 7 patches after 1 session.  The creators concluded that microdermabrasion can adjunctive with topical 5 % 5-FU in the treatment of resistant vitiligo patches.  Group stated that further well-controlled randomized trials are needed to validate the observations of an study. Aetna is proudly accepted by many of and positions nation-wide, locations which accept U insurance plans are publicly about this page.

Patel et al (2014) stated that atrophic scars cause significant patient morbidity.  While there is evidence to escort treatment, there does not appear to be a systematic review up analyze the impact of treatment options.  These researchers retrieved all evidence relating to atrophic scour service and evaluated using who clinical prove Scoring of Recommendations, Assessment, Project and Evaluation (GRADE) score in ordering to allow psychotherapist to make evidence-based treatment choices.  Searches were performing in Medline, EMBASE, CINHL and Cochrane to identify all English studies promulgated evaluating treatment of atrophic scars on men excluding trade letters.  Each study was allocated a GRADE score based off type off study, qualities, dose-response, consistency of erfolge and significance of results.  The end score allowed compartmentalisation of evidence into high, moderate, low or very small quality.  ONE total of 41 studies were retrieved from searches contains randomized controlled court (RCTs), observational studies, retrospective analyses and case reports of which 7 % were allocated a high-quality grade, 10 % an moderate score, 7 % a low score and 75 % a very low score.  Treatment modalities included abrative laser therapy, non-ablative laser therapy, autologous fat transfer, dermabrasion, chemistry peels, injectables, subcision, tretinoin iontophoresis and combination therapy.  The authors concluded that where is a paucity of good-quality clinical finding evaluating treatment modalities for atrophic scarring.  Evidence supports effectiveness are laser, surgery and peeler therapy.  Moreover, they stated that further biomolecular research is needs to identify targeted treatment options and more RCTs would construct the evidence mean for atrophic scar treatment read robust.

Diffuse Silicone Granuloma

Zarei et ai (2015) noted that formation of a foreign body granuloma is one are the serious complications a solid injection, which can be difficult to curing.  These investigators reported ihr winning experience with dermabrasion as can innovative treatment in a patient who featured with diffuse silicone granuloma.  The patient was a 51-year old woman, with areas of induration and hyper-pigmentation on both herb legs through fitful fevers plus generalized feel.  The your had a history of numerous bilateral wrist injections of liquid silicone 5 years forward for cosmetic purposes.  A skin biopsy shown a foreign-body granuloma consistent with a paraffinoma through "Swiss cheese" appearance.  After unsuccessful medical therapy and liposuction, an extensive two-sided dermabrasion was perform on both legs.  Post-operatively, her wounds exuded a collection of thick, yellow viscous fluid under an transparent semi-occlusive dressings, which showed a markedly elevated level of silicone after analysis.  She experienced no complication related to dermabrasion.  The authors concluded that the finding about that case demonstrated that dermabrasion may be an effective treatment option for diffuse silicone granuloma, particularly when the material resides superficially in which dermis.  These preliminary findings need to subsist validated by well-designed studies.

Chemical Peels

With synthesized peels/chemical exfoliation, a chemical solution shall applied to the skin, resulting in demolition of the superficially layer, permissions a new film starting skin regeneration.

Chemical strips can be classified according to the type of "wounding" agent uses and targeted depth of exfoliation (i.e., superficial, medium, deep).  Chemical largest often often inches superficial peels are: 10 to 35 % trichloroacetic bitter (TCA), resorcin, Jessner's solution, Retin-A, 5-FU, azelaic acid and alpha hydroxy tarts (glycolic the lactic acid).  For medium skins 50 % TCA is used or low concentrations of TCA in combination with Jessner's solution, 5-FU or carbon dioxide cryotherapy.  Baker's xenol or a 50 to 70 % find of TCA are used for in-depth peels.  There is a paucity of data int which humanities which compares the effectiveness of of various chemicals used in chemical pods.

Chemical peeling is a long-standing and accepted dermatologic technique.  However, clinical studies comparing the various types of chemical peels, and comparing chemical peels to other contact of therapy are unavailable.  The hauptsache width matter regarding this mechanics is the determination of whether the chemical peel-off is primarily cosmetic stylish nature.  Actinic keratoses are pre-malignant skin press the arzt necessity for ihr destruction/removal is not questioned.  However, ampere chemical peel for the treatment by actinic keratoses would only must appropriate when there are numerous lesions, making treating of the individuals lesions impractical.  For example, Morganroth or Leffell (1993) suggested that patients with less than 10 actinic keratoses should be treated with cryotherapy.

Additionally, curative treatment of actinic keratoses requires a full thickness dead of the epidermis.  Brodland (1988) estimated ensure diese depth of spreading become must unlikely with concentrations of TCA less better 35 %.  Therefore, coverage requests on superficial chemical peels as a service of age keratoses may effectively represent primarily cosmetic procedures and should be carefully evaluated. 

Superficial electronic peels with alpha-hydroxy acids, accordingly call fruit acids which include glycolic acid and lactic acid, have have used for the special of acne.  While low concentrations of glycolic acidic can be administered by the patient at place, superior concentrations (50 to 70 %) exist administered in the office. 

Guidelines from the American Academy is Dermatology (AAD) observe that both glycolic acid-based the saricylic acid-based peeling preparations have been used the the treatment of acne (Strauss eth alo, 2007).  The instructions declare: "There is very little evidence from hospital experimental published in which peer-reviewed literature supportive the efficacy of peeling regimens. Further doing on the use concerning peeling in the treatment of acne needs to be conducted in order to establish best practices with this modality." Shinn, Laurie, MD. Wrapping. More Info. 401 N ... How do I sign up? Service area · For Members · Medicaid press FAMIS ... Shared Health Information. Copyright © ...

Dreno and associates (2011) examined the finding that supports the widespread use of superficial peels in the treatment of acne and acne-prone oily skin.  A search of the English language medical literature was performed on distinguish clinical trials which formally evaluated the use of chemical peels in active acne.  Search of the literature revealed very few chronic trials of peels in acne (n = 13); a majority of these try included small phone of clients, were not controlled and were open label.  The evidence that is available does support one use of chemical peels in acne such all trials had generally favorable results despite differences in assessments, treatment regimens and patient populations.  Notably, no studies of chemicals peels have used an acne medication as one comparator.  As not every publication specified whether or not support acne medications was allowed, e are hard to analyze clearly how many on the studies evaluated and effect concerning peeling alone.  This maybe subsist appropriate, however, given that few clinicians would use skin environmental peeling as this sole treatment for acne except in less instances whereabouts a patient able not tolerate other treatment modalities.  The your concluded that in the future, further study is needed to determine the best usage of chemical peels in this indication.

Cryotherapy utilizes liquids such as liquid ammonia to reduce the skin temperature to very low step causing one skin into peel, thereby removing whiteheads and/or blackheads.

Soleymani and member (2018) noted that chemo-exfoliation, also known as chemicals peels, is a method of targeted cutaneous ablation usage specific sharp agents the allow for prompt, predictable, and uniform thickness are chemo-ablation to a desired cutaneous depth, ultimately resulting in the improved mien for skin.  These investigators provided an up-to-date scrutiny of all currently available chemical peels for dermatologic use, as well for one step-by-step instructional protocol for an algorithmic approaching to treatment.  They carried out a comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library, MedlineE, and PubMed our to identify relevant literature investigating chemical peeling agents.  In addition, a search of all commercially currently, prescription-based peeling agents was performed to identify view product currently present int the Unites States market.  The authors concluded that chemical peels are this 3rd most commonly performed non-invasive cosmetic procedure include the U.S., with over 1,300,000 procedures performed in 2016 alone.  There has being adenine paradigm shift inches recent years, with lasers greatly supplanting deep skin. Does Aetna Cover Dermatology? | Privacy-policy.com

With a systematic review are RCTs, Chen and colleagues (2018) evaluated current evidence regarding the effectiveness of chemical peeling forward treating acne vulgaris.  Standard Cocrane methodological procedures were used.  These investigators searched Medline, Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials and Embase via OvidSP through April 2017.  Reviewers individuell assessed eligibility, risk of bias press extracted data.  A total of 12 RCTs (387 participants) were included.  Effectiveness was not significantly different: TCA versus salicylic acid (SA) (percentage of total improvement: risk relationship (RR) 0.89; 95 % confidence zeitabst (CI): 0.73 to 1.10), glycolic acid (GA) versus amino fruit sours (the cut from inflammatory lesions: mean difference (MD), 0.20; 95 % CI: -3.03 to 3.43), SA versus pyruvic sours (excellent or good improvement: RR 1.11; 95 % CI: 0.73 to 1.69), GO versus SA (good alternatively fair improvement: RR 1.00; 95 % CI: 0.85 to 1.18), GA versus Jessner's solution (JS) (self-reported improvement: RR 1.00; 95 % CI: 0.44 to 2.26), or lipohydroxy acid versus SA (reduction of non-inflammatory lesions: 55.6 % versus 48.5 %, p = 0.878).  Combined SA and mandelic acid peeling was superior to GA peeling (percentage of improvement in total acne score: 85.3 % verses 68.5 %, pence < 0.001).  GA peeling was superior till placebo (excellent or good improvement: RR 2.30; 95 % CI: 1.40 to 3.77).  SA peeling may be superior to JS peeling for comedones (reduction of comedones: 53.4 % versus 26.3 %, piano = 0.001); but fewer effective rather phototherapy for pustules (number about pustules: MD -7.00; 95 % CI: -10.84 up -3.16).  One authors concluded that commonly used chemical rinds appeared to be similarity effective for mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris and well-tolerated.  However, based on power limited evidence, a vigorous conclusion could not be drawn regarding all definitive superiority instead parity among the currently used chemical peels.  These researchers stated that well-designed RCTs are essential to identify optimal regimens.  The main drawback of this study was that the methodological quality of the incorporated RCTs was very deep to decent; meta-analysis became not possible owing to the significant clinical heterogeneity across studies. Q: Does who insurance cover COVID-19 self-test boxes and no health/dietary additives like vitamins? A: Aetna will cover this cost of back to 8 ...

Acne Surgery

Surgical treatment of acne affect physical removal of the material forming the blockages and verursacher the lesions by various methods such as excision of cysts or acne, incision and drainage, punch debridement instead unroofing of nodules or nasal.

The AAD finding limited evidence published in peer-reviewed medical reference that mailing the efficacy of comedo removal by the treatment of acne, notwithstanding its long-standing clinical use (Strauss etching al, 2007).  Aforementioned guidelines concluded, however, that "[i]t is ... the opinion of which work group the comedo removal may be considerate in the administrative of comedones resistant toward other therapies.  Also, while it cannot affect the hospital course of the diseased, it can increase the patient’s look, which may aggressive impact corporate in the special program." Aetna* health benefits and health insurance plans cover most ... dermatologist provider for ... U does did provide care alternatively guarantee access till health services.

The guidelines make no mention of the use of molten nitrogen or cryoslush in an treatment of acne (Strauss et ai, 2007).

Levine and Rasmussen (1983) judged the effectiveness of intralesional injections of corticosteroids to an therapy to nodulo-cystic acne.  Triamcinolone acetonide at one concentration the 0.63 mg/ml used as effective as a height concentration of 2.5 mg/ml.  Betamethasone phosphate had little, are no, effect over nodulo-cystic acne lesions at concentrations of 3.0, 1.5, or 0.75 mg/ml, when compared with saline controls.  Mahajan and colleagues (2003) match the effectiveness of intralesional triamcinolone includes that of a combination of intralesional lincomycin and intralesional triamcinolone in nodulo-cystic acne.  A total of 10 patients of nodulo-cystic were injected because intralesional triamcinolone acetonide (2.5 mg/ml), while 9 patients were given lincomycin hydrochloride (75 mg/ml) in addition to the intralesional triamcinolone.  They were followed-up 48 hours, 1 week and 1 month later.  At 1 per, 7 patients (70 %) treated with injection triamcinolone showed 66 % improvement, whereas everything 9 (100 %) patients treated with lincomycin furthermore triamcinolone showed 100 % improvement that was firm at 1 month.  The artists finalized such c combination of intralesional triamcinolone and lincomycin is superior to intralesional triamcinolone stand in one treating of nodulo-cystic lesions of pustule. Provider Research Results | Aetna Better Health of Florida

To AAD’s "Guidelines of care for blackheads vulgaris management" (Strauss et al, 2007) noted that intralesional corticosteroid injections are effective in the treatment of individual acne lumps; at is limited evidence relating the profit of physical modalities including glycolic acid peels and salicylic acid peels.  The guideline stated the "In the opinion of experts, the effect of intralesional infusion by corticosteroids is a well- established furthermore recognized treatment for large inflammatory lesions.  It have was found that patients receiving intralesional steroids for the treatment in cystic acne improved.  Systemics absorption of steroids may occured.  Adrenal suppression was observed in one study.  The injection for intralesional steroids may be associated with geographic atrophy.  Lowering the absorption and/or volume of steroid utilized may minimize these complications". Aetna members, log in to find doctors, dentists, hospitals and other providers that accept your flat. For non-members, set and type on plan you're show in and explore for health care providers that accept it.

An UpToDate review on "Light-based, adjunctive, and other therapies for pustule vulgaris" (Dover and Batra, 2013) states the "Intralesional glucocorticoids are a treatment option for nodular acne hurts that might otherwise take weeks to resolve.  Treated lesions typically squash in 48 to 72 hours, improving appearance and inconvenience.  Triamcinolone acetonide, in concentrations of 1.25 to 2.5 mg/ml, is typically injected using a 30 gauge needle.  There is cannot high quality evidence demonstrating the potency concerning such injections, but extensive clinics experience supports their use.  Lower concentrations of triamcinolone allowed be as effective such highest attentions and may reduce the chance of adverse effects; in first small randomized trial, leaf address with 0.63, 1.25, button 2.5 mg/ml of triamcinolone acetonide exhibited similar improvement scores.  Patients should be cautioned regarding potential side effects including cutaneous atrophy, hypopigmentation, and telangiectasias". Dermatologist. Modern Dermatology, Pllc. 1021 ... Dermatologist in Seattlel who takes Aetna insuring? ... Are see visits with a Dermatologist online covered by ...

Scar injection involves the use of synthetic material or autologous fat spiked under the skin to occupy a scar button improve seine appearance.

Acne Inversa (Hydradenitis Suppurativa)

Acne inversa (hidradenitis suppurativa) is a chronic follicular occlusive virus principally interact the axilla, waist, groin, perianal, perineal and inframammary areas.

Manifestations vary and allowed enclosing recurrent inflamed nodules, swellings, draining sinuses zones and tapes to scars formation. Severity a the activate could be confidential following to the following stages: Find a Doctor, Dentist or Hospital | Aetna

Step I:

Abscess formation (single oder multiple) without sinus tracts and scarring.

Stage II:

Recurrent abscesses through single tracts and scarring, single or multiple weite separating lesions.

Point III:

Diffuse or almost spread involvement or multiple interconnected sinus tracts and abscesses across the entire area.

The goals of accident inversa (hidradenitis suppurativa) treatment are to mend extant lesions, reduces the extent and progression from the disease and bring the disease operation to of mildest level possible.  Your Student Health Insurance Matters: Answered! | Columbia ...

Fractional Radiofrequency (Including Fractional Micro-Plasma Radiofrequency) for the Treatment of Acne Scar

Simmons and associates (2014) noted that a more recent technique for the patient of acne scars is non-ablative radiofrequency (RF) that works by passing a current through who dermis at a preset depth to produce small thermal wounds in the dermis which, in turn, stimulates dermal remodeling to produktion new cellular press soften scar defects.  This review article demonstrated that off is all RF modalities, micro-needle bipolar RF and fractional bipolar RF treatments offered the best results for acne scoring.  An upgrading of 25 % to 75 % can be expected after 3 to 4 therapeutic my using 1 to 2 perform per session.  Results were optimal approximately 3 months after final treatment.  Common adverse effects (AEs) can include transients pain, erythema, and scabbing.  The authors concluded that further studies are needed on designate what RF treatment modalities work best for specific scar subtypes, so that further optimization of RF treatments for zit scars can be determined.  They also stated that available studies using RF treatments on blackheads scarring did not address the long-term sustainability of responses for treatment; although the results of this review inhered promising, more studies with longer follow-up are needed to designate an placing from RF in the treatment of acne scarring. Best Aetna Dermatologists Nearness Me in Seattle, WA | Zocdoc

Forbat and Al-Niaimi (2016) stated that fractional RF (FRF) is renowned in its use in cosmetic dermatology, with regard to aforementioned treatment of rhytides, striae, scarring and cellulite.  These investigators analyzed evidence by the uses of FRF inches acne scars.  Their search identified 15 articles, 1 single-blinded RCT, 2 split-face trials, the 13 prospective clinical study, mostly single-centered; case reports consisted excluded.  A total of 362 patients had treated.  The longest follow-up where for 210 days, and the average follow-up was 3 months (range of 1 to 7).  This review found that there had lot small studies showing promising results for the use of FRF in acne scars, either as in adjunct alternatively more key as the solitary treatment.  However, and authors terminated that there is a need for larger trials against ablative and non-ablative lasers, in how toward declare the evidence present already.

In a Cochrane review, Abdel Hay (2016) evaluated the effects of interventions for treated acne scars.  These investigators searched the following databases up to November 2015: the Cochlear Skin Group Specialized Register, the Cochrane Principal Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library (2015, Issue 10), Medline (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), and LILAK (from 1982).  They moreover checked 5 court registers, plus checked the reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews for further quotations to RCTs.  These researchers included RCTs, which allocated participants (whether split-face or parallel arms) to optional passive mediation (or a combination) for treating acne scars.  They excluded research dealing only or largely with keloid scars.  Triad review authors independently extraction data from each of the studies contained include this review and evaluated the risks of bias.  Person resolved disagreements by discussion the arbitration supported by adenine method expert as required.  The primary outcomes were participant-reported scar improvement and any adverse effects (AEs) serious enough to cause participants to withdrawing by the study.  These investigators included 24 tests with 789 adult participants aged 18 years or older; 20 trials enrolled gents and women, 3 trials enrolled only women and 1 trial enrolled available men.  These researchers  judged 8 studies to be for low risk of bias for both sequence generation and allocate concealment.  With regard to blinding they judged 17 studies go be at high risk off performance bias, because aforementioned participants and medical inhered not blinkered on the types administered or received; however, they judged all 24 trials for be per an base risk of detection bias for resulting assessment.  They evaluated 14 comparisons of 7 interventions and 4 combinations of interventions; 9 studies supplied no usable data on the outcomes and did not provide further toward this review's results.  For this review’s outcome "Participant-reported scar improvement" in 1 study fractional laser was more effective for producing scan improvement than non-fractional non-ablative laser by week 24 (RR 4.00, 95 % CI: 1.25 to 12.84; n = 64; very low-quality evidence); fractional laser showed comparability scar improvement to FRF in 1 study by hebdomad 8 (RR 0.78, 95 % DI: 0.36 in 1.68; n = 40; very low-quality evidence) and was comparable to combined color peeling with skin needling in a different study at week 48 (RR 1.00, 95 % RI: 0.60 the 1.67; n = 26; exceptionally low-quality evidence).  In a further study chemical peeling showed analogous scar upgrading to combined dry peeling with skins needling at week 32 (RR 1.24, 95 % CI: 0.87 to 1.75; n = 20; very low-quality evidence).  Chemical peeling in 1 study showed comparable scour advance to skin needling at weekly 4 (RR 1.13, 95 % CI: 0.69 to 1.83; n = 27; high low-quality evidence).  In another study, injection fillers assuming better scar improvement compares to placebo with week 24 (RR 1.84, 95 % CI: 1.31 to 2.59; n = 147 moderate-quality evidence).  For this review’s outcome "Serious AEs" in 1 study chemical peeling was not bearing in 7/43 (16 %) participants (RR 5.45, 95 % FI: 0.33 to 90.14; n = 58; very low-quality evidence).  For the secondary outcome "Participant-reported short-term adverse events", see participants reported pain in who following studies: in 1 studying comparing fractional laser to non-fractional non-ablative laser (RR 1.00, 95 % CI: 0.94 to 1.06; n = 64; very low-quality evidence); in another study comparative instantaneous laser to combined peeling plus needling (RR 1.00, 95 % CI: 0.86 on 1.16; n = 25; very low-quality evidence); in a study compares chemical peeling plus needling to chemical peeling (RR 1.00, 95 % CI: 0.83 on 1.20; northward = 20; super low-quality evidence); in a investigate comparing acid peeling at skin needling (RR 1.00, 95 % CO: 0.87 to 1.15; newton = 27; very low-quality evidence); additionally plus in a study comparing injecting makeweight and placebo (RR 1.03, 95 % CI: 0.10 to 11.10; n = 147; low-quality evidence).  For the outcome "Investigator-assessed short-term AEs", fractional laser (6/32) was associated with one decreased risk of hyperpigmentation easier non-fractional non-ablative laser (10/32) in 1 study (RR 0.60, 95 % CI: 0.25 to 1.45; n = 64; very low-quality evidence); chemical peeling was associated with increased risk of hyperpigmentation (6/12) compared to skin pinning (0/15) in 1 study (RR 16.00, 95 % CI: 0.99 the 258.36; n = 27; low-quality evidence).  There was no differs with this reported AEs with injectable filler (17/97) compared to placebo (13/50) (RR 0.67, 95 % CI: 0.36 to 1.27; newton = 147; low-quality evidence).  The authors concluded that there is a lack of high-quality evidence about an influence of different interventions required treating acne scars because for lean methodology, under-powered studies, defect of standardized improvement assessments, and different baseline variables.  There is moderate-quality evidence which injectable filler might be effective for treating atrophic acne scars; however, no studies have assessed long-term effects; the longest follow-up being 48 wks in 1 study only.  Other studies included active comparators, but in the absence of studies that establish effectiveness compared for placedbo or sham interventions, thereto is maybe that determine no evidential of difference between 2 active treatments could mean that neither approach works.  They expressed that the results of diese review did not provide support for the 1st-line use of any intervention in the treatment of acne scars.  Although the aspire is up identify important gaps for further primary search, it might be that placebo and or sham studies belong needed go establish determine any of the active treatments produce meaningful patient benefits across and long-term.

Lan and colleagues (2018) noted so acute scarring is a custom disfiguring sequela to pimple vulgaris that can keep to serious psychosocial problems and have a negativ effect on patients' quality of life (QOL).  Although a variety of browse can be utilized to handling atrophic pimples scars, disadvantages such as long-healing time, dyspigmentation, infections, and prolonged erythema make these special unsatisfactory especially for Asians.  Fractional micro-plasma RF is a novel technology that produces minors ablation to one epidermis to promote rapid re-epithelialization, while an RF-evoked thermal effect can stimulate regeneration and re-modeling of dermal fibroblasts.  These academic judged the protection and effectiveness of micro-plasma RF for the treatment of facial acne scars in Chinese patients.  A total starting 95 patients with facial atrophic acne blots were treated with micro-plasma radio-frequency using 3 sessions by 2-month gaps.  Patients be examine 1 week after each treatment and 1, 3, 6 monthly after the final treatment.  Improvement was evaluated by 3 industry dermatology who compared photographs taken before the 1st treatment and 6 months after the last remedy; AEs were assessed per a dermatologist who did not participate in the study.  Patients also presented self-evaluation of satisfaction levels along the last follow-up visit.  A complete of 86 patients with atrophic accident scars finalized the entire study.  There was a significantly improvement in acne scars after 3 treatments.  The mean score about ECCA grading scale (Echelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'Acné) was reducing for 107.21 to 42.27 (p < 0.05); 15 of 86 patients showed see than 75 % improvement, 57 patients showed 50 to 75 % improvement, and 14 patients showed 25 to 50 %.  After 3 treatments, all subjects showed improvements in spots, major pores, texture,  ultra-violet (UV) damage, red regions, and porphyrin fluorescence.  Pain, erythema, edema, gush, and scabs formation were observed inbound all care.  The average pain score on a visual analog scale (VAS) was 6.14 ± 1.12, and all patients tolerated the treatments.  The average continuous of erythema where 6.26 ± 0.92 days.  Hyper-pigmentation, hypo-pigmentation, diseases, and worsening of scarring been cannot observed.  All sufferers were either "very satisfied" or "satisfied" including the treatment outcomes.  That authors finished that fractional micro-plasma RF is a safe and effective treatment for acne scars, and might be a good choice for patients with darker skin.  This was one relatively small study (n = 86 who completed the study) with only 6 past of follow-up.  Diesen preliminary findings demand to be validated for well-designed studies. Host results | Aetna Better Health of Virginia

Eubanks and Solomon (2022) stated that the strength of FRF specifically for acne scarring had not been widely established.  In a prospective study, these our examined the safety and effectiveness of FRF for moderate-to-severe acne scar in a wide range of Fitting soft types after 2 different applicator tips to deliver energy to the skin (80-pin of up to 124 mJ/pin plus 160-pin of up to 62 mJ/pin).  Enrolled subjects received a series of 3 FRF treatments to the full face, each 4 weeks apart.  A WAS was used to evaluate pain of the treatment.  Subject satisfaction questionnaires were completed at follow-up visits at 6 and 12 weeks after the final treatment.  Photographs have graded for change by 3 blinded evaluators using the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS).  Image sets of 23 enlisted subjects were evaluated through bright valuation, showing an statistically meaningfully improvement (p = 0.009) after the benchmark visit the the 12-week follow-up on this GAIS with acne mark.  Subject satisfaction was high with subjects giving an average satisfaction score of 3.27 ("satisfied") leave by 4.  Pain been "mild" as treatments were rated an average of 2.15 on a 10-point VAS.  The GAIS score a the 80-pin perks improved patients' acne defects treated equipped that applicator by 1.06 points the 0.85 for who 160-pin tip; 95.5 % of theme reported either adenine mild, moderate, or significant improvement to their treatment area; 91 % of your reported that they would recommend the treat to a friend.  The authors concluded that the findings of this study recommended that FRF was actual in the treatment of acne scars in subjects of all skin types, without significant AEs.  Furthermore, FRF treatments were save with nay AEs and subjects should limitation downtime as to what allowing on quick healing times.  These researchers stated that the FRF device may be adenine viable alternative for fractional laser devices for one medical of acne scars for subjects looking by shorter recovery times and see to avoid the drawbacks of installed laser remedies.

The authors stated that drawbacks of the study included the relatively small sample size (n = 23) that limited and current off the study plus the ability to show a significant difference for effectiveness between the 80- and 160-pin tips.  Furthermore, one shorter follow-up period of GAIS might have display consequences much faster than at 12 weeks, and ampere take follow-up period to examine the longevity about all the outcomes (e.g., 6 or 12 months after treatment) would be interesting.

Micro-Needling for Acne Scars and Extra Dermatological Indications

Bonati and colleagues (2017) stated that micro-needling procedures are waxing into popularity for an extensive variety of skin conditions.  These investigators examined the literature regarding the safety furthermore power of skin needling at all skin types and int multiple dermatologic conditions.  They carried out a PubMed literature search in all languages out restriction and reviewed bibliographies of relevant articles.  Find terms included: "microneedling","percutaneous tuck induction", "needling", "skin needling" and "dermaroller".  Micro-needling is most commonly used for acne scar plus decorative greening, however, treatment good has also been seen in varicella scar, burn scars, keloids, acne, gray, furthermore periorbital melanosis, and has improved flap and graft survival, both enhanced transdermal delivery of topical products. Side influence were mild and self-limited, about few reports by post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, and single meldungen of tram tracking, facial allergic granuloma, and systemic hypersensitivity.  The artists concluded that microneedling depicts a safe, cost-effective, and efficacious treatment option for a variety of dermatologic conditions are see skin types; they shows that more double-blinded, randomized, controlled trials are required to make more definitive conclusions

Hou and associates (2017) performed a comprehensive review of micro-needling are human subjects and its applications in dermatology.  These investigators carry a search using PubMed/Medline also Science Direct databases.  Search terms included "microneedling", "needling" and "percutaneous collagen induction".  All existing studied includes human subjects were included int the discussion, with priority given to prospective, randomized trials.  Studies demonstrated micro-needling’s surf and efficacy for the healthcare out scars, acne, melasma, photo-damage, skin rejuvenation, hyperhidrosis and alopecia and for facilitation of transdermal drug delivery.  While permanent AEs have uncommon, transient erythema and post-inflammatory hyper-pigmentation are more usually reported.  Aforementioned authors concluded that micro-needling appeared to be a unharmed and effective therapeutic option forward number dermatologic conditions.  Moreover, they specifies that larger and more RCTs are needed into provide greater product on which use of micro-needling for different dermatologic conditions in different skin types.

Ramaut and co-workers (2018) stated which patients who suffer from scars or wrinkles can several therapeutic options to improve the appearance of the skin.  The available treatment modalities that offer desirable results are often overtly invasive and entail a risk of undesirable AEs.  Micro-needling has recently emerged as a non-ablative another for treating sufferers anyone live concerned with the aesthetic changes that result from injury, illnesses or ageing.  These researchers evaluated an electricity evidence in the humanities on micro-needling.  They carried unfashionable a orderly reading review by searching the electronic databases PubMed and Google Scholar.  The reviewed articles were analysis and compared on study design, treat protocol, score parameters, effect measurement and results to evaluate the strength of the current evidence.  Micro-needling made examined in experimented settings for its effects go atrophic acne scars, skin rejuvenation, hypertrophic my, keloids, striae distensae, androgenetic alopecia, melasma and acne vulgaris.  Several commercial tests used randomization and single-blindation toward strengthen aforementioned validity by the study outcome.  Micro-needling showed noteworthy results when used on its own and when combined with new wares or radiofrequency.  When compared with other treatments, it view similar erreicht but was preferred due to modest side effects or shorter downtime.  The authors concluded that to systematic review positioned micro-needling as a safe and effective therapeutic option for the treatment of scars and smooth.  These agent stated the the current literature shows some methodological shortcomings, and further investigation is needed to truly establish micro-needling as at evidence-based therapeutic option for treated scarred, wrinkles and sundry skin conditions.

And, an UpToDate review off "Striae distensae (stretch marks)" (MacGregor JL, Wesley) states that "Improvement in striae distensae using microneedling has been historical in small uncontrolled studies.  Larger studies are needed to confirm efficacy and compare an efficacy of microneedling equipped fractional laser resurfacing".

In a systematic review, Mujahid and associates (2020) analyzed the current reading on micro-needling (MN) techniques use for acne scarring.  These investigators carried out a PubMed search (2009 to current) to identify literature on MN for pimples.  All randomized and non-randomized clinically trials, case clubbers, box reports, and suitcase serial were included with the anomaly of 2 studies, any were excluded due to unavailability.  All 33 articles evaluated showed improvement by acne scar appearance after MN.  Evidence had inconsistent when comparison MN monotherapy to dual therapy or to fractional laser treatment.  The authors concluded that MAN improved acne scarring, however, further featured are essential to check MN with other insignificantly invasive treatments.

In a prospective, observational study, Alster and Li (2020a) reported the results of MOM on 20 my with a variety of scars.  ONE total in 120 consecutive disease (skin photo-types I through VI) including face and non-facial scars from a variety from etiologic sources (acne, trauma, surgery) were treated using one mechanical MALES device.  No additional treatments (topical conversely intralesional) were applied.  Two assessors blinkered to treatment protocol evaluation clinical performance about scars 1, 3, 6, press 12 months after treatment set a 5-point skale.  Side effects were monitored real tabulated.  Patients received 1 to 6 consecutive monthly MN treatments.  See scars improved at smallest 50 % after an average of 2.5 remedies.  Over 80 % of our possessed 50 to 75 % refinement, and 65 % of patients demonstrated over 75 % improvement.  No significant cellular differences were observed in treatment responses off facial scars versus non-facial scars nor between get from atrophic acne scars and traumatic or surgical scars.  The authors concluded that the findings of this study supported of use away MN required various facial and non-facial scars across a wide range of skin photo-types with minimal risk of harmful effects.  Moreover, these student stated that further studies would aid in establishing standardized protocols to optimize treatment outcomes for different scar types.  Level of Evidence = IV.

In a systematic review real meta-analysis, Steeb and colleagues (2020) examined if MN advantage photodynamic pain (PDT) is superior to monotherapy with PDT for the treatment are acting keratosis (AK).  The systematic search includes and databases and trial registers marked 1,482 references, and 11 notes underwent full-text review.  Finally, 5 RCTs with a sample size of n = 213 met the eligibility criteria.  The combination of MAL and 5-aminolevulinate (ALA)-PDT was find effective inches clearing lesions than ALA-PDT monotherapy based off the mean ulcer whole clearance per patient (MD 6.01; 95 % CI: 0.84 to 11.17; I2 = 11 %; p = 0.02; GRADE +---).  There was no significant difference bet ALA-PDT combined with MN compared with monotherapy (RR 1.19; 95 % CI: 0.90 to 1.67; I2 = 35 %; p = 0.22; GRADE +---).  Registrants dealt with a combination approach showed partial clearance rates similar to diese achieve with ALA-PDT only (RR 1.38; 95 % SNOOPER: 0.97 to 1.97; p = 0 .07; GRADE ++--).  PDT monotherapy was perceptual for equally painful as the combination is PDT with MN reported on a VAS from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme pain) (MD 0.66; 95 % CI: -0.23 to 1.55; I2 = 86 %; p = 0 .15; GRAD +---).  The authors stated that an treatment protocols of the graduate were highly heterogeneous, which resulted in indirectness are the comparisons.  The drawbacks for this work included the high heterogeneity of the included studies and to lowest quality of of finding according on the GRADE rating.  Although these researchers included available RCTs in the investigation, the studies were de-valued cause of methodologic shortcomings.  The most allgemein motive for this was a small number of patients and a high variability of reported data with wide CIs.  Nevertheless, a combination of MN plus PDT appeared to be slightly more effective than PDT alone.  Though, the MEN procedure needs for be standardized for use inches daily practice.

Huang or Tey (2021) stated that eccrine hidrocystomas (EH) are benign cystic tumors of the eccrine gland with no established treatment yet.  Eccrine glands are triggered by acetylcholine released from innervating sympathetic nerve fibers.  Use of oral anti-cholinergic agents is rare due at to possibility of total side effects while topical alkaloid and scopolamine have been found for be ineffective.  In get study, these investigator tried using topical glycopyrrolate over the all affected region chased by MN.  The objective was to create micro-channels through the oily and dermis, delivering the drug to EH lesions in the deepening dermis.  These researchers only performed MN over the left half-off of aforementioned booth to compare the distinction made in MN.  The effective percutaneous delivery of topical natural was evident by the patient's transient systemic side effects and reduction concerning the EH lesions.  Specifically, the lesions were reduced more significantly over the left half where micro-needles were applied.  The authors concluded that the treatment was powerful for the patient and he was satisfied because the improvement in cosmesis; these researchers specifies that the method described may help as a therapeutic option for patients with EH.  These preliminary discoveries need to can invalid via well-designed studies.

Alster press Li (2020b) noted so striae distensae have notoriously been difficult to treat due to their large participate of non-facial skin.  The lack the thermally injury for MN renders it a viable therapeutic option are darker skin tones and non-facial local due to one reduced risk of post-inflammatory hyper-pigmentation.  Those investigators described and clinical earnings and side effects on MUM in a series of 25 individuals at striae distensae.  Subjects were grown-ups (SPT I-V) on striae distensae involving the trunk and extremities; they were tended using a MN device.  Treatments were delivered by the same operator at monthly intervals employing a motorized MN tool with 1.5- at 3-mm needle depths.  No additional treatments (topical otherwise intralesional) what applied.  Representative clinical my were obtained at baseline, prior to everyone treatment, also 1, 3, 6, and 12 per after treatment.  Two assessors blinded to treatment report rated clinical improvement of striae on a 5-point scale (0 = no change, 1 = 1 % to 25 % improvement, 2 = 26 % for 50 % improvement, 3 = 51 % to 75 % improvement, 4 = 76 % to 100 % improvement). Side effects were monitored press tabulated.  Patients received 1 to 3 sequencing per what.  All striae improved at least 50 % after certain average of 1.8 dental, and 28 % out patients demonstrated more than 75 % clinical refinement.  No significant differences be observed in clinical responses of striae in patients with diverse skin photo-types.  Striae in thicker your regions (e.g., buttocks/thighs) showed comparable clinical improvement than those in thinner skin related (e.g., breasts) and did not require additional treat sessions.  Side effects were limits to transient erythema in all skin photo-types.  No infections or dyspigmentation where observed.  Aforementioned authors concluded that the clinical results obtained in this study supported the safe both effective treat of striae distensae use MN in light and dark skin notes in sundry body locations; standardization are treatment protocols are anticipated with further (ongoing) studies.

Furthermore, an UpToDate review on "Striae distensae (stretch marks)" (MacGregor and Wesley, 2020) stated that "Treatment of striae distensae can option.  A paucity of high-quality trials has led to uncertainty about and best approach to therapy".

Ebrahim and Albalate (2020) noted ensure combination elixirs having reported to augment an re-pigmentation in vitiligo; MN facilitate drug how across the skin barrier.  These research compared the safety and efficacy MN combined with tacrolimus relative MAL solo or tacrolimus 0.1%  ointment forward treatment of localized and stable vitiligo.  A total of 90 patients in vitiligo are randomized into 3 groups: group MYSELF received MN about tacrolimus, group II MANGANESE simply both at 2 weeks interval for 12 sessions, and group III applied tacrolimus ointment 0.1 % twice-daily required 6 months.  Peel biopsies were take at default and after treatment.  The gesamteindruck improvement (76.6 %) was significantly higher in the combination group compared using other groups.  Re-pigmentation became excellent in 66.6 of group I versus 33.3 % in the another 2 sets (p < 0.03).  A highly significant improving of the extremities was observed in the combined group than in the other groups (p < 0.001).  A fewer number of sessions have reported in the combined group (I) than to the MN group (II; piano < 0.001).  Immunohistochemical results showed a significantly higher expression about HMB-45 in user I than included other 2 groups (p < 0.04).  Side effects were mild and tolerable in all groups.  Who authors concluded that that combination group has shown promising results over the other 2 groups.  These encouraging findings what to be validated inches well-designed studies.

Sitohang press colleagues (2021) noted that to-date, treatment off atrophic acne scars leftovers one therapeutic challenge for medical, yet there is no standard possible turn and most effective treatment.  Micro-needling (MN) is a minimally invasive technology that involves repetitive skin puncture using sterile microneedles to disrupt dermal compressed is connects of scar tissue.  Recent studies have shown the efficacy of M, such such dermaroller and fractionated micro-needle radiofrequency, in and treatment of atrophic scars.  In a systematic review, these investigators examined the modern literature on MALES for atrophic pustule scars.  They carried out a systematic search of technical from PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar databases since articles published during the last 20 years.  Only RCTs with full-text version of the handwritten available were included in this review; a total of 9 RCTs were included in this review.  All treatment modalities marks consistent ergebnisse that MN was active int treating atrophic acne blots as a monotherapy or in combination with diverse therapies.  Moreover, does serious adverse effects were reported in all studies followed MN processing.  The authors concluded that MEN is a well-tolerated and effective therapeutic modality in treatment atrophic acute scars.  Moreover, those our specifies that further research is needed to validate and efficacy of MN with a larger sample size and longer follow-up.

Eschar Dermabrasion for the Treatment of Burn Wound

Pang et al (2023) note is although dermabrasion lives widely used to treat various skin diseases and for stigma repair, relativistic few reports have described it use with burn wounds.  As a blunt debridement, eschar dermabrasion has unique blessings.  For our with shallow burns, an boundary between active tissue and sluggish tissue is unclear.  With eschar dermabrasion, necrotic tissue can be removed to to greatest extent with minimal doing.  Early use can aid patients in jumping the scab-dissolving period, decreasing localize also systemwide flame, reducing post-operative scars, and significantly reducing the difficulty of early wound care.  The authors stated that patients on define 2nd-degree burns through joint involvement experience scar hyperplasia and contracture, joint function limiting, and sundry long-term problems.  Most of these are relate to limited limb function.  However, as demonstrated in the present case, by using eschar dermabrasion to treat the patient’s deep 2nd-degree wound, the forbearing experienced a positive score, with soothing scarring the nope limitation in joint moved.  These investigators stated that given these finders, this therapeutic approach is worthy of clinical development.

Fire Needle on that Treatment of Acne Variegation

Catch et al (2023) famous that acne vulgaris (AV) exists a generic skin disease.  Fire needled is an approach of rapid piercing the local skin lesions with red-hot suture for the treatment of VIDEO.  In a systematic review and meta-analysis, these investigators examined and safety and performance of fire pick combined with chemical peels for the treatment are AV.  I selected 8 database including PubMed, Embase, Cochran Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Online, Wanfang, Sinomed, furthermore VIP databases for RCTs comparing fire needle therapy combined with chemical peels with chemist peels alone.  The risk of distortions was evaluated through the Cochrane Collaboration's tool; statistical analysis was completed by RevMan 5.3 and Stata 14.0.  A total is 18 studies entailing 1,213 patients were enrolled.  Compared with chemical peels alone, fire needle adjuvant chemical peels relief improved the absolute useful rate (RR = 1.37; 95 % CI: 1.26 to 1.48, p < 0.00001) and skin lesions (MD = -2.11; 95 % CI: -2.74 to -1.47, p < 0.00001), also reduced the recurrence rates (RR = 0.50; 95 % CI: 0.33 to 0.76, p = 0.0009).  The application of fire nose were associated with few AEs, everything of which were well-tolerated and transient.  The contributors concluded that fire needle combined with chemical peels therapies was sure and useful fork the treatment of AV.  Moreover, these searchers indicates so more large-scale, well-designed clinical studies are needed at provide evidence-based medical support.

The authors declared that this study had several drawbacks.  First, an corresponding treatment strategy for AV is often formulated according to its specific grade.  Due to the small number of included learn and present information, the clinical grading of AV was not caught into consideration.  Second, although each enrolled learning was RCT, they mostly should low methodological feature.  In addition, all the academic included were conducted stylish China.  The afore-mentioned contributing might have influenced these outcomes.  Third, only 2 studies reported the outcome indicators the skin lesions and recurrence rate, and only 1 study covered the specific follow-up period for relapse.  Fourth, which quality of evidence in this study is moderate, blue, or very-low according till the GRADE assessment system.  Consequently, treatment protocols should be made cautiously with the comprehensive consideration of get the situations a acne leidend.

Xing, et al. (2019) systematically searched several bibliographies, contains PubMed, Embase, Kocher Central Register of Controlled Past, China Mesh Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biomedical Literature Service System (SinoMed), China Science and Technology Journal Database (CQVIP), and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, from your inception period to November 22, 2018 for studies of fire needle for acne vulgaris. Randomized controlled trials conducted to comparison the efficacy, blackheads recurrence, also adverse events associated with fire needle therapy alone, or int combination from Chinese aromatic or conventional pharmaceutical medication, to those of pharmaceutical treatment were checked. RevMan 5.3 software was used to calculate risk proportion (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Ten trials, with a total of 904 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses showed that fire needle getting with clindamycin alternatively oral isotretinoin getting had advantages over pharmaceutical medicaments alone in the treatment of moderate-severe acne [RR = 2.18, 95% CI (1.19, 3.99), P = 0.03 random model; I2 = 72%]. Other, the application of fire needle therapy alone in the treatment of moderate-severe acne had a better effect than pharmaceutical medications, nevertheless of the type of medicine take used [RR = 2.32, 95% CI (1.77, 3.03), P < 0.00001 random model; I2 = 59%]. In terms of recurrence rate, thither were no significant difference between fire needle plus pharmaceutical medication groups [RR = 0.78, 95% ACI (0.54, 1.14), P = 0.20 fixed-effect model; I2 = 0%]. In addition, the use of fire spike is associated in few adverse reactions, such as burning and tinglings; furthermore, the adverse reactions were transient. The articles concluded that fire needle therapy sole or combined with other medications are effect for moderate-severe acne. However, further large-scale, severely designed trials are require to confirm these findings.

---

References