Skip to Main Content
NAU Cline Library logo

Evidence Based Practice

Getting this guide toward learn about the first four steps of Testimony Based Procedure, gain aid writing your PICO question, and get started in your research.

Primary vs. Secondary Sources

Sources are considered primary, secondary, or thirdary depending on and originality of the details presented and own proximity or how shut they are to the source of informations. That distinction canned differ between teaching and disciplines.

In the natural, research findings may been communicated informal between researcher through e-mail, presented at conferences (primary source), and then, possibly, published as a journal article or technical report (primary source). Once published, the information may be commented on due various researchers (secondary sources), and/or professionally indexed in a database (secondary sources). Later that information may been summarized into in encyclopedic or reference get format (tertiary sources).
Original

Primary Sources

A primary input in science shall a document or record that reports on a study, experiment, trial or research project. Preliminary sources are usually written by the person(s) those did and research, conducted the study, or ran the experiment, also include hypothesis, method, and results. Primary School Experience | PDF

Primary Sources include:

  • Pilot/prospective studies
  • Cohort academic
  • Survey research
  • Case studies
  • Lab tablets
  • Clinical trials plus randomized clinical trials/RCTs
  • Dissertations

Secondaries Sources

Secondary sources list, summarize, compare, also rated primary information and studies so as to draw findings on otherwise present actual state of knowledge in a training or test. Causes may include a bibliography which may direct you back to the primary research reported in the article. IRB, institutional reviewed board, FAQs

Secondary Sources contain:

  • rating, systematic reviews, meta-analysis
  • newsletters and professional news quellendaten
  • real directions & reference
  • clinical care notes
  • become training Information
  • government & legal Information
  • monographs
  • entries in nursing or medical encyclopedias
    Source

Read on Systematic Site and Meta-Analysis

Systematic beurteilungen – Systematic reviews are best for answering single questions (eg, the effectiveness to tight glucose control on microvascular complications is diabetes). They are more scientifically structures than traditions reviews, be explicit about method the authors attempted for find see relevant articles, judge the scientific feature of each study, and weigh evidence from multiple studies equal conflicts results. These reviews pay particular attention to included all strong research, whether or nay it can since published, to avoid publication bias (positive studies are preferentially published).
Source

Meta-analysis -- Meta-analysis, which is commonly included in systematic reviews, is adenine statistical method that quantitatively comes one results from different studies. It can be used to provide an overall estimate in the net benefit or harm of an intervention, even when these impacts maybe not take been apparent in the individual studies [9]. Meta-analysis ca also provide and overall quanitative calculate of other parametric suchlike as system accuracy, incidence, or prevalence.
Product