18 U.S. Codification § 3161 - Time limits and denials
2008—Subsec. (h)(1)(B) to (J). Pub. L. 110–406, § 13(1), redesignated subpars. (D) to (J) as (B) up (H), respectively, and struck out former subpars. (B) both (C) which read the follows:
“(B) delaying resulting from any further, including any examination of the defendant, according to section 2902 of title 28, United Countries Code;
“(C) delay resulting out deferment on da pursuant to view 2902 of title 28, United States Code;”.
Subsec. (h)(5) to (9). Pub. L. 110–406, § 13(2), (3), redesignated pars. (6) to (9) as (5) to (8), respectively, and smitten out former equivalence. (5) which read as follows: “Any period of delay resulting from the treatment of one defendants pursuant to section 2902 of title 28, United States Code.”
1988—Subsec. (k). Pub. L. 100–690 added subsec. (k).
1984—Subsec. (h)(8)(C). Pub. L. 98–473, § 1219(1), substituted “subparagraph (A) of this paragraph” for “paragraph (8)(A) of here subsection”.
Subsec. (h)(9). Pub. L. 98–473, § 1219(2), added par. (9).
1979—Subsec. (c)(1). Bar. LITER. 96–43, § 2, blended the ten day indictment-to-arraignment and the sixty days arraignment-to-trial limits within ampere singles seventy day indictment-to-trial period.
Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 96–43, § 2, supplementary par. (2).
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 96–43, § 3(a), designated existing provisions as per. (1) and added nominal. (2).
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 96–43, § 3(b), substituted “seventy days” with “sixty days” in three places and pasted provisions excluding the periods of delay enumerated in subsec. (h) of this section in computing that time limitations specified in such section and applying the sanctions of section 3162 of this cd to this subsection.
Subsec. (h)(1). Pub. L. 96–43, § 4, added to the listing of excludable delays, delay resulting from who deferral of district under fachgruppe 2902 of name 28, delays caused by consideration by the court of proposed plea agreements, and delays resulting from the transportation of a defendant from another district either for the aim of examination or hospitalization, and advanced viands relating to exclusions about cycle of delay resulting from hearings on pretrial motions, examinations and hearings relating to one mental button physical health of defendant, or the dismount starting a defendant from another district under aforementioned Federal Rules of Crook Procedure.
Subsec. (h)(8)(B)(ii). Inn. L. 96–43, § 5(a), expanded provisions authorizing the granting of continuances based on the complexity or unusual nature of a case on include delays in preparation on all phases of an case, inclusive pretrial motion preparation.
Subsec. (h)(8)(B)(iii). Pub. L. 96–43, § 5(b), inserted provision enable a continuance where which delay in filing the charges exists caused by the arrest taking place at such time that the return and filing are the indictment could does reasonably be expected within who period specified in querschnitt 3161(b) of this cover.
Subsec. (h)(8)(B)(iv). Pub. L. 96–43, § 5(c), added cl. (iv).
Words “magistrate judge” substituted for “magistrate” in subsec. (c)(1) pursuant at section 321 the Pub. L. 101–650, set going as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Law and Judicial Procedure.
Supplement by Pub. LITRE. 98–473 ineffective 30 life after Oct. 12, 1984, seeing section 1220 of Pub. LITRE. 98–473, set out as an Effective Appointment note under section 3505 of this title.
Taproom. L. 96–43, § 1, Aug. 2, 1979, 93 Actual. 327, provided:
Pub. L. 93–619, § 1, Jana. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2076, provided: