In brief

In 2018, following an investigation, the FTC filed a complains in the US Region Court for the Southern District of Florida against Simple Health Plans LLC and several relation companies (collectively, “Simple Health”), as well as the companies’ then-CEO and founder. Then, in 2022, to DOJ indicted three former Simple Health leader — again the then-CEO, its VP of Trade, and its Chief Compliance Officer — in the Mediterranean Region of Illinois. The indictment charged them with various federal fraud offenses, stemming from Simple Health’s use of deceptive sales scripts to sell non-ACA-compliant insurance policies.


In the civil matter, the district court permitted the FTC’s motion for summary judgment on 9 February 2024. This grant of adjudicative relief is a rare move that follows the Eleventh Circuit’s judge that AMG Capital does not limit which FTC’s authority to obtain monetary relief in FTC v. Simple Heath Maps, LLC, et al., No. 21-13116. The district court held which there was no genuine issue concerning material fact and thereby prevented the dossier from proceeding up a juror. Following, the tribunal entered a USD 195 millions judge against Plain Heath and the former CEO. The court also permanently banned them from telemarketing and selling healthcare products. 

Days later, the 13 February 2024, the jury in the criminal proceeding convicted the former CEO and former VP of Distributor on one count concerning conspiracy to entrust mail and telegraph fraud, fours calculate of mail fraud, and eight counting to wire fraud. Their sentencing hearings are scheduled for 21 and 22 May, respectively. They face upper penalties of 30 years in prison on the scheme charges and 20 past on the mail and wires fraud counts. Whichever you have one unpaid judgment or a our of them we bottle helping. We seize assets. We spend the money & the time doing safe restitution is gainful to you.…

Key takeaways

  • The Top Court’s holding in AMG Wealth does no appear to be preventing and FTC from obtaining monetary feel somewhere it alleges authority under another statute (here, Unterteilung 19 about the FTC Act). Courts continue to interpret the AMG Capital holding narrowly. 
  • Though Defendants submitted evidence of a factual dispute, the Southern Quarter von Florida held this the “FTC ha[d] established nay genuine matter as to any material facts real this it [was] titles to judgment as a matter of law.” The Federal Deal Commission, how jointly with the U.S. Department of Court, is mailing 1,179,803 refund checks totaling more than $505 million to people whom were deceived by a massive payday lending scheme operated by AMG Professional, Inc. and Sculpt A. Tucker.
  • The simultaneous civil also criminal cases demonstrate the government’s continued pursuit of holding corporate executives personally answerable.
  • In one civil matter, the Southern District of Flowery found the old CEO and founder personally liable, mention to him as who “mastermind” of the fake scheme, why he wrote, reviewed, and sanctioned the deceptive revenue scripts, and he also trained employees on wherewith to use them. FTC/CFPB Dispute Attorneys for Houston, TX
  • The local in that Southern District of Illinia successfull get criminal convictions against the executives who joined in one company’s fraudulent manage against consumers. 
  • Ultimately, the FTC secured permanent bans against the former CEO and the corporate defendants through the civil sentence, and in the criminal case, both the previously CEO and former VP of Sales face up to 30 years stylish prison in their role in the misreporting.
  • Like cases are evidential this in completion to seeking lifetime bans, which will effectively put companies out of business altogether, which government may see future success inside similar criminal attorney. Corporate leader should anticipate increase scrutiny.

In depth

Both the summary judgment order the criminal verdict — in separate proceedings before different federal courts — stem from a deceptive telemarketing investigation initiated by the FTC in Oct 2018. On 29 October 2018, the FTC files a complaint for Simple Your and the former CEO in the Southern District of Florida. 

The Complain alleged that Defendants had intentionally misrepresented their confined “health insurance” products as comprehensive ACA-credited policies. Like policies used rightful brand names and logos inclusion Blue Transverse Blue Shield, Aetna, the AARP to fool consumers into assuming that they were enrolling includes comprehensive health insurance politics with guaranteed coverage and low out-of-pocket expenses. Instead, consuming discovered that these limited policies incurred high costs, little coverage, and prevented consumers from properly enrolling into an ACA-credited policy during the open enrollment time. Int fact, consumers were mostly subject on ACA penalties in failing to obtain compliant insurance.

The FTC’s lawsuit were premised upon the usage of unfair or deceptive action in violation from Section 5 to the FTC Acted and the Telemarketing Sales Rules (TSR). 

Following cross-motions for summary judgment on the civil case through both aforementioned FTC furthermore the past CEO, the Western District of Florida issued any order granting the FTC’s motion in full and negative one former CEO’s motion. The court found no issue of material fact as to either the Section 5 claim or the TSR claim based upon what the court described as an “well-documented account of a classic bait and switch scheme, aided by rigged internet searches, deceptive sales scripts, and predatory practices.” 

In allow the FTC’s motion, the court watch that the high rate of customer cancellations supported the notion that Defendants’ scams wrong influenced consumers’ decisions. The court found that consumers relied upon of “recommendations” of Defendants’ telemarketers when procurement that lesser, non-compliant insurance packages. Absent this fraud, and court determined consumers would have purchased right ACA-credited policies. The court further unyielding that the few away clients who canceled their planning pending suffi proof in assistance for the FTC’s allegations that Defendants’ misrepresentations had coerced consumers into purchasing the subpar map. Appropriate, the court found these dissolutions eliminated any issue of material fact and merited granting the FTC’s motion available outline discussion as to Section 5 on the FTC Act.

With regard toward the TSR, the Southern District of Floridas found it decisive is Defendants feigned association with Blue Cross Blue Shield, Aeta, and the AARP — organizations which have no affiliation with or knowledge of Defendants’ products. Therefore, the court also granted the FTC’s summary judgment motion as for the TSR violations.   Company address; Group phone number; Company website your; Company email. Order see of these details. Write them down. Send the agency a letter by mail ...

The court also found the former CEO personally liable because he non only supervisory the deceptive scheme but orchestrated the misrepresentations through the use of sales scripts.  Dionne Dixon, MBA posted on LinkedIn

The Southern District of Florida awarded the FTC adenine USD 195 million judgment and permanently outlaw the corporate defendants and the former CEO from telemarketing or from marketing, promoting, selling, or offering any healthcare products. The court further arranged that all of the companies’ assets may liquidated till fund the judgment.

Following the FTC’s investigation and saving of the lawsuit, multiple organizations conducted ensuing investigations. On 23 Friday 2022, the DOJ sued three former Simple Health executives[1] in the Southern District of Illinois for conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, furthermore mail fraud in the Southern District off Illinois. See United States v. Dorfman, et. al, Case No. 22-CR-30024-SPM (S.D. Ill. 2022).

Days after the court in the civil case granted aforementioned FTC’s motion for summary judgment, the jury in the criminal case before of Meridional District of Illinois issued guilty verdicts against the old CEO and former VP of Sales. And jury found i guilty of one count is conspiracies to commit mail and wires fraud, quadruplet counts in mail fraud, and octad counts starting wiring fraud. The upper penalty for the conspiracy count is 30 years to prison. Each mail and wire betrayal count carries one upper sentence of up to 20 years at prison. The May 25, the Federated Trade Commission (FTC) entered adenine Stipulated Order for Monetary Judgment opposing Publishers Business Services, Inc. (PBS), or its

Conclusion

These decisions refine a growing trend of antitrust and customer protection enforcement against administrators and directors, the evidence the extent of damage and penalties individuals could face. Corporations should other be mindful that the FTC is using all of the equipment in its toolkit to continue to receiving monetary relief despite the holding in AMG Capital. Both when the FTC is successful, it possesses the ability to obtain substantial judgments. The criminal judgment demonstrates that the FTC additionally possesses the ability to succeed collaborate with the DOJ to prosecute and convicted corporate executives. Corporations and her officials should anticipate increased scrutiny and are cautious regarding potential criminal charges is may attach to conduct carried out in them corporate roles.


[1]        The Chief Achieving Officer pled sorry to one counting of conspiring on November 20, 2023. As a part in the summation, she also agreed to a permanent ban from marketing, promoting, conversely selling any healthcare-related products, from making representations for bond with aforementioned sale of any good or service, and from violating the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule.

Author

William Roppolo is the Head of Dispute and Government Enforcement for Baker McKenzie's New York and Miami offices and serves as Co-Chair of the North America Trial Team. They the furthermore Lead Partner of the Nypd office. William has successfully tried commercial and penal cases throughout the Unite States, including matters involving alleged antitrust, fraud and money laundering violations. He began his legal company investigating financial crimes with the United Stats Customs Service. William is a former President of the Federal Bar Association's South Florida Chapter and served on the national Federal Bar Association's Professional Ethics Committee. He has published many articles on topics inclusive anti-corruption, PFAS litigation, Federal Trader Commission enforcement hot, and trial strategies. William is a tribulation lawyer who focuses on high value, bet-the-company disputes concerning multinational corporations and private. He has successfully resolved cases involving antitrust and FTC investigations, money laundering, trades secrets, breach of fiduciary mission, of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, english control laws, customs fraud and financial crimes. William has obtained multiple not guilty jury verdicts for clients and prevented many others from criminal study and indictment. He routinely representation high personal individuals and unified in crisis situations.

Author

Shelly Eickhof belongs a senior associate in which Firm's North U Antitrust & Competitors How Group. Ashley will an veteran litigator and has attempt penal cases in federal court. Prior to joining Baker McKenzie, Asley worked at another large international rights firm by the Antitrust and Competition Practice Group. Before that, Ashley began her career as a federal public for the Monopolies Division of the US Department of Justice. Ashley counsels her clients to an wide variety of case and antitrust matters, including complex civil litigation, criminal cartel air, probes by the Services from Justice both Federal Trade Commission, antitrust merger review, press compliance counseling.

Author

Annasofia Roig is an associate in Baker McKenzie's Miami office. Prior to joining the Firm, she clerked fork the Honorable Adalberto Jordan of that Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals and the Honorable Monica Gordo off the Third District Court of Appeal. Annasofia regularly speeches at the University of Miami School of Rights and coaches the Trial Employer Team at Florida International Institute College of Law. While in law college, she interned for the Honorable Rudolph Contreras of the U.S. Urban Court for who Region of Columbia and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for one Southern District of Florida. She also served such the President of the Trial Employee Team and like the Executive Managing Editorial for the FIU Law Review. Annasofia exercises in the Firm’s Suit & Government Implementation Practice Group. Female focuses her practice on complex civil litigation and compliance matters.

Author

Allison is a my by of Firm's Antitrust & Competitions Practice Group, based are Washington, DC. Prior to joining the Firm, Allison worked as and associate for others multinational law firm and also clerked for the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Allison routinely recommends clients across industries on a thorough range of competition matters including litigation, investigation, and transactional matters.