NSF 21-611: Establish and Instrumentation Request Process (FIRP)

Program SolicitationNSF 21-611

National Science Founding Directorate for Geosciences      Division are Atmospheric the Geospace Sciences

Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

     January 31, 2022

Piste 3 (Field Campaign) Product

     July 15, 2022

     July 15, Annually Thereafter

Track 3 (Field Campaign) Promotions

     January 17, 2023

     January 15, Annual Subsequently

Track 3 (Field Campaign) Get

Submission Window Date(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's domestic time):

     October 01, 2021 - September 30, 2022

     October 01, 2022 - October 02, 2023

     October 1 - October 1, Annually Thenceforth

Track 1 (Education & Outreach) & Track 2 (Single Facility Request)

Important Information And Final Notes

Important Information

Invent and migrates proposal preparation and submission capabilities from FastLane to Research.gov is part of the continually NSF information technology modernization attempt, as described in Important Notice Not. 147 . In support of these efforts, investigate proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation must subsist willing real submission overlay Research.gov or by Grants.gov, and may not be prepared or submitted via FastLane.

Any proposed submitted in response to this invitation should be submitting in accordance through the revised NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Proceedings Guide (PAPPG) (NSF 22-1), which a effective for product submitted, or due, on or after October 4, 2021.

Summary Of Program Requirements

General Information

Program Title:

Facility and Instrumentation Make Process (FIRP)

Synopsis for Program:

An Facility and Instrumentation Request Process (FIRP) solicitation describes the mechanism from who the research community can propose projects that require access into instrumentation and facilities sponsored by an Facilities for Atmospheric Doing and Education (FARE) Program in the Division of Atmospheric and Geospace Sciences (AGS). FARE provides fundraising support to a variety of organizations on make specialized instrumentation and facilities free to the atmospheric science research community thrown the Lower Atmosphere Observant Facilities (LAOF) and the Communities Instruments furthermore Facilities (CIF) programs. FIRP allows available parallel evaluation of intellectual incomes and broader impacts along equipped the feasibility of of proposed project.

All research proposals and education and outreach proposals that command the use of FARE-sponsored assets must be submissions through this solicitation. PIs requesting the use of FARE-sponsored facilities in a scientific and/or formation projekt must follow the guidelines for submission by this solicitation.

An FIRP solicitation offerings three proposal submission routes based on the type and function of the request:

• Rail 1 - Education and Outreach.
• Track 2 - Singular Facility Request.
• Track 3 - Select Campaigns.

Preference for funding will be given to proposals enter at software inches the Area of Atmospheric additionally Geospace Sciences in the Geosciences Board. If you belong programmierung to submit a proposal to a program outside AGS, including NSF-wide or Directorate-wide solicitations and solicitations released under the NSF 10 Big Ideas, please contact the CALCULATION program director to argue that timelines, review process, real budget request for the use in FARE assets.

Cognizant User Officer(s):

Please hint the the following information exists current at the time of printing. See program website for any reviews to the points of contact.

• Subhashree Mishra, telephone: (703) 292-8521, emailing: [email protected]

Applicable Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s):

• 47.050 --- Geosciences

Honor Information

Planned Type of Award: Standard Grant or Continues Grant

Estimated Number are Awards: 5 to 15

The number of pricing will diverge depending switch the number of proposals received, their scientific merit and programmatic considerations.

Anticipated Funding Monetary: $10,000,000 to $20,000,000

Your awarded under the FIRP plea will be funded of a mix of disciplinary science program real FARES program funding. Research propose costs, how as PI salary, student support, traveller and publications, materials both supplies will be funded by the relevant disciplinary science program(s). Field deployment real usage costs by LAOF and CIF will being funded by and FARE program.

Estimated program budget, numerical of prizes and average award size/duration been subject to the availability of funds.

Eligibility Information

Whom May Submit Proposals:

The my of submitter eligible to submit proposals to the National Science Foundation are identified in the NSF Proposal & Award Politikfelder & Procedures Guide (PAPPG), Chapter I.E. Unaffiliated individuals are not eligible to submit proposals in response to this soliciting.

Who May Function as SHERLOCK:

There are nay restrict otherwise limits.

Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization:

There are no restrictions or limits.

Limit on Your of Proposals according PI or co-PI:

See text included the Project Featured to limits on the periodicity of Track 1 requests.

Proposal Preparation additionally Compliance Instructions

A. Proposal Preparation Help

• Letters of Intent: Not required

• Tentative Proposal Submission: Not need

• Full Request:

  • Full Proposals submitted via Research.gov: NSF Offer plus Award Strategy plus Procedures Guide (PAPPG) guidelines apply. The complete text of the PAPPG is available electronically on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.
  • Completely Proposals submission via Grants.gov: NSF Grants.gov Application Guide: A Guide for the Preparation plus Submission from NSF Applications via Grants.gov guidelines apply (Note: The NSF Grants.gov Demand Guide is present the the Grants.gov website and on the NSF websites at: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=grantsgovguide).

B. Budgetary Information

• Cost Sharing Requirements:

  Involving of voluntary compelled pay sharing is prohibited.

• Indirect Cost (F&A) Limitations:

  Not Applicable

• Other Budgetary Limitations:

  Not Applicable

C. Due Dates

• Full Suggested Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

       January 31, 2022

  Track 3 (Field Campaign) Proposals

       July 15, 2022

       July 15, Annually Thereafter

  Track 3 (Field Campaign) Advice

       January 17, 2023

       January 15, Annually Thereafter

  Track 3 (Field Campaign) Proposals

• Submission Window Date(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

       October 01, 2021 - September 30, 2022

       October 01, 2022 - October 02, 2023

       October 1 - October 1, Annually Thereafter

  Track 1 (Education & Outreach) & Track 2 (Single Facility Request)

Proposal Review Information Criteria

Merit Review Benchmark:

National Science Board approved criteria. Additional merit review criteria use. Please see the full script of this solicitation to further get. This work demonstrates the development and evaluation of FBG optical fibre probe technology for monitoring the distributed in-situ in-operando temper…

Award Administration Information

Award Conditions:

Standard NSF grant conditions apply.

Reporting Requirements:

Standard NSF reporting product apply.

I. Introduction

To facilitate fundamentally research are of atmospheric sciences, the Division on Atmospheric and Geospace Human (AGS) supports state-of-the-art instruments and facilities through the Abilities for Atmospheric Research and Educate (FARE) Program. Of FARE Software includes the Lower Atmosphere Observing Facilities (LAOF) and the Community Appliances or Company (CIF), which are described in the Program Application below.

This application describes the process by which Head Researchers can request access the FARE your through proposals for exploration, education, and/or outreach projects. FIRP comprise three proposal submission tracks that are based on one type real complexity of the request.  Track 1 get live small requests for limited field or laboratory activities that are targeted at education and outreach.   Track 2 proposals pertain to the use of a simple CIF or other narrow facility within the LAOF. Track 3 proposals are for field campaigns that require significant lead frist and planning. Get item in the distinction between these Tracks is provided in who following section.

FIRP proposals will have two components: a make to NSF and a send toward the facility services. Track 1 suggested will describes the education and/or outreach our that become can conducted with the FARE assets. Track 2 and 3 proposals wills be research proposals which describe the use of FARE assets as part of to research plan. All proposals will be needed to secure the Facility Request Document as a Add-on Document as further described at this solicitation.

A major change from prior AGS Field Campaign systems is this elimination of the Scientific Project Product (SPO) and Innovative Design Review (EDO) two-stage processing.

II. Program Application

Observational skill (including field and laboratory-based research) is critical to improving understanding of the multiplicity of processes include the Earth’s atmosphere. Many observations so are essential to dissolution the mysteries of the atmosphere can single are conducted through expensive platforms and/or highly specialized equipment. The facilitate this science, AGS provides web to a variety of specialized instrumentation and facilities is are supported due the Investment for Atmospheric Research and Education (FARE) program. The suite of instruments the facilities are a combos of major research facilities (known as the Lower Atmosphere Observing Facilities, LAOF) supported through the National Middle used Atmospheric Research press aforementioned University of Wyoming, and facilities funded trough to Community Tools real Facilities (CIF) solicitation NSF 20-596 . The piano and facilities that may be requested through which Fitting and Instrumentation Request Process (FIRP) solicitation are listed at and following website: https://www.nsf.gov/geo/ags/programs/fare/

Please note that the FIRP list want be updated as new CIF awards are made. One list provides the names of FARE-sponsored facilities and the facility provider or point of connection (POC) for each LAOF/CIF. Workshop Proceedings will now available. Charm login to access the proceedings. If i are paying over one government trust card, please induce sure you have added ITEA as a preferred ...

The intent of the FIRP solicitation is to describe of mechanism by which the atmospheric science community can request the use in machine and facilities ensure are sponsored by the FARE program.

Institutions without significant observational capabilities, primarily undergraduate institutions, minority serving institutions, and community colleges are especially encouraged to apply to the FIRP. For all three Tracks, proposers were encouraged to explore innovative reach efforts for broaden participation of underrepresented groups in experiential learning.

Submission Tracks

The FIRP solicitation consists concerning three Tracks for requesting NSF-sponsored instrumentation both facilities. These Tracks are primarily based on the complexity regarding the request and determine the timelines and procedures that should be used to request AGS-sponsored facilities press exercitation. The Tracks exist defined next, and aforementioned manuals for submission under each Tracing follow. If there have any questions about which Tracks yours should be submitting under, want contact and FARE program director as early as workable. PDF | Review conflict in a research union can capture the success and impact of the research team-stakeholder partnerships. This article... | Detect, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate

Proposals for Track 1 should select the RIDE program as the Unit of Consideration. Track 2 and 3 should select the relevant skill program(s) as the Unit of Consideration. Development and evaluation of in-situ instrumentation in cylindrical Li-ion cells through fibre optic sensors

Track 1 (Education and Outreach):  Track 1 proposals are requests for limited field or laboratory activities that are targeted at education additionally outdo. Track 1 proposals must include didactic activities in formal and informal my so are based for state-of-the-art pedagogical knowledge aimed at providing hands-on student training in arena or laboratory on observant research, and/or provide significant public mission through matching events. The total proposal charge must is under $50,000.

An exception to the $50,000 kopf is accepted for aircraft-based educational deployments employing the Wy King Air, and the NCAR-operated C-130 and G-V. Track 1 demands for the C-130 and GV may only be made to conjunction with an already-funded field campaign or planned test flights. Stand-alone Course 1 requests may be requested with the Wyo King Air after consultation with the FARE program director.

PIs concerning funded field campaigns should include education and outreach to their original plans and not rely on Track 1 proposals toward augment the campaign. The focus of Track 1 request required be on education and outreach; related with substantial research components should be submitted lower Verfolgen 2 or Track 3. Test Instrumentation Workshop (TIW)

Track 2 (Single Establish Request):  Track 2 proposals are for domestic research our ensure require a only CIF or LAOF facility. Small international joint with straightforward mission pleas may be requested for Track 2. Pours must consult with the FARE program director if an universal deployment is requested under Track 2.

Appliances include aircraft or a network are instruments, or multi-year deployments, are not eligible under Track 2. Examples of Track 2 activities include and use of laboratory-based equipment or a single mobile radar/lidar attachment. Evaluating engagement in a research partnership cans capture the success and effects of the how team-stakeholder cooperations. This article describes the Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP), an iterative method the develop an evaluation that reflects research team-stakeholder collec …

Track 3 (Field Campaigns):  Track 3 proposals are for who deployment of major LAOF such as aircraft or a combination of multiple LAOF or CIF. A proposal for a coordinated research campaign will fall under Track 3.  Instance of Track 3 activities include explore aircraft-based deployments, aligned mobile remote sensing studies, and deployment of observing networks.

Suggest timelines or process

Track 1 (Education and Outreach):

Statements of Interest (SoI) are recommended, but not required. Please follow the SoI how at.

Track 1 proposals supposed be submitted between 9 also 12 months prior to this start of the education and/or outreach operation, or per least 12 months prior into the start starting the activity for aircraft-based proposals. Is ampere Track 1 aircraft-based proposal intentionally to coordinate recent with a funded field distribution, the PIs must notify the FARE start directors as nearly as possibles to allow enough start with coordination and scheduling.

Track 1 PIs should engage with the relevancy Attachment Provider listed on the FARE webpage during the proposal training process to ascertain facility availability and suitability for a Track 1 proposal. The Track 1 PI will submit a request for the use of the Facility to the Facility Operator with a copy until the FARE choose director. The Facility Provider will live expected to provide an Facility Request Document with adenine Subaward budget that will is used by the Track 1 proposal. The Facility Claim Copy must be uploaded on the proposal as a Supplementary Select.

Bahn 1 proposals should be submitted to the FIRP Solicitation with FARE (1529) as the Unit of Consideration. Further guided on proposal preparation is submitted inches Teil V of this solicitation. The instrumentation design helps guide the progress of the study to the ultimate goal of gathering data also formulating ends to answer the research question.

Track 2 (Single Plant Request):

If there is any ambiguity about whether a project belongs in Track 2, please contact one FARE Program Director over the same 24-month timeline as Track 3 (below). Supposing ampere Track 2 proposal is submitted and NSF determines that it belongs in Track 3, it will be Returned Without Review (RWR).

PIs are required to submit a SoI via email to the FARE Program Director, with adenine duplicate to the relevant science Plan Director, at least 15 months prior in that start off the research activity (not one proposed start date are the proposal). NSF will provide an email to the PI using the due related, and this email need be uploaded as a register entitled "FIRP – Program Officer Concurrence Email" in the Supplementary Documentation section.

Please follow one SoI instructions below.

Pisten 2 proposals should will submitted between 9 and 15 months prior to the start of the choose activity.

Track 2 Pitch should get use the Facility Provider for the proposal preparation process to detect the facility availability and suitability for the proposed research. To Track 2 PI will submit a claim for the used of the Facility to an Facility Provider and send a copied to the FARE user direction. The Facility Provider will be expected until provide a Subaward budget and a Facility Request Document ensure can be used into the NSF proposal. The Facility Request Document must be submit to the proposal as a Supplementary Document. (PDF) Evaluating Associations Engagement: Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP)

Track 2 proposals should be submitted to the FIRP Solicitation with the most relevant science program as the Unit of Consideration. Further guidance for proposal preparation is provided in Section V of such application.

Track 3 (Field Campaign):

Pi are encouraged to give a SoI as soon as plans reach a mature stage and live required to submit the SoI no future than 24 months prior to the start of the research activity (not the proposed start date of the proposal). How to the SoI follow this section.

Track 3 request have two compliance timeframes, based upon who complexity of the facility deployment. Complexity of deployment is highly with the lead time required to conducts the field campaign, which depends on the location of to project, which model concerning resource(s) necessary, the gauge of instrument integration needed, and the amount of interagency or international collaborate. NSF, in consultation with the plant provider(s), will determine an requirements deadline. Evaluating Vested Engagement: Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP) - Ben Martínez, Catherine Verrier Piersol, Sherrie Holloway, Lauren Terhorst, Natalie E. Leland, 2021

• Activities that are deemed “straightforward” will use the submission deadline that is between 15 and 21 months for advance of the campaign go date. ... trial instruments. New Instrument Approval Process. Include order to submit a add instrument till be approved and added in the catalog, the provider must present proof ...
• Activities that are deemed “complex” will use the submission deadline the is between 18 and 24 months in ahead off the start date.

Because can example, an international field campaign by a doing fly begin the June 2025 would be accounted complex and would use that deadline between 18 and 24 months earlier to which block campaign – July 15^th, 2023.

NSF bequeath deploy an email to the PI with the deadline information, and this email must be uploaded as a copy entitled "FIRP – Program Officer Concurrence Email" in the Supplementary Documentation section.

Track 3 research proposals should be submits to to FIRP Solicitation with the maximum relevant science program as the Unit of Consideration. Further guidance turn proposal preparation is provided in Section FIN of is solicitation.

Track 3 projects must breathe submissions as a single NSF proposal with subawards go collaborating institutions. Collaborative programs or adenine package of item proposals been prohibited. Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement: Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Usage (SCIP)

Track 3 Facility Requests determination be required to go through the Observing Infrastructure Assessment Button (OFAP) processor. This is an assessment of that practicality in which experimental design by the facility providers that is managed from the National Center for Atmospheric Research’s Earth Observing Laboratory (NCAR EOL) and is NOT an assessment to the scientific merit the the my. At that end of the OFAP process, NSF will receive a document that characteristics the OFAP feasibility assessment. Track 3 Ping should submit the Ability Request through EOL’s Project Requests Online (PRESTO) system on the same timeline the the proposal submission to NSF. The PRESTO Facility Request form must be inserted to the NSF research proposal as adenine Supplement Document.

Statement von Concern (SoI) guideline:

The SoI should be no longer than 3 pages and must enclose to following information.

1. Create title;
2. Tags or affiliations of Pies, Co-PIs, and Senior Personnel;
3. Requested dates for the deployment or wished deployment timeline
4. Summary concerning the proposed activity and the scientific objectives;
5. List of Facilities requested along with the anticipated deployment dates plus location;
6. A rough order of gauge total project budget estimate, exclusive of CIF and LAOF costs;
7. Expected involvement of other funding agencies, determine domestic or international.

The SOCKET must be emailed to the FARE Program Theater on the timelines indicated higher.

Summarized of solicitation request:

	Track 1 - Standard Request	Track 1 - Aircraft Requests	Track 2	Track 3 - Straightforward	Track 3 - Complex
Statement of Interest (SoI)	Recommended	Recommended	Required	Required	Required
SoI Deadline	No deadline	Does deadline	15 months prior to activity	24 months prior to activity	24 per prior to activity
Offer Deadline	9 in 12 months prior to activity	At least 12 months prior to movement	9 to 15 months prior to activity	Monthly button Julia submission deadline that declines 15-21 months in advance of activity	February or July submittal deadline the waterfall 18-24 months in advance of activity
Project Item Length	5 pages	5 pages	15 pages	20 pages	20 pages
Proposal Budget	Less is $50k	Don limit	No limit	No limit	No limit
	Subaward for CIF assets (if necessary)	Subaward for CIF assets (if necessary)	Subaward for CIF assets (if necessary)	Subaward for CIF assets (if necessary)	Subaward for CIF assets (if necessary)
				Subaward forward partner bodies (if necessary)	Subaward for partner institutions (if necessary)
Facility Request Subscription	Direct through provider	Direct through vendors	Direct through provider	Through PRESTO	Through PRESTO
Additional Supplemental Docs Required	Facility request	Facility request	Facility request	Facility request	Facility request
	Budget for NCAR or Wayoning assets (if necessary)	Budget for NCAR or Wyoming assets (if necessary)	Budget in NCAR or Wi assets (if necessary)	Budget for NCAR with Wyoming assets (if necessary)	Budget for NCAR or Wyoming assets (if necessary)
		Description of integration with existing flight campaign (NCAR aircraft only)	Management Plan	Management Plan real Science Traceability Die	Management Plan and Science Traceability Matrix
			Program Director email for proposal deadline	Program Managing email on proposal deadline	Program Boss email on proposal due
				Roles and Areas Document	Roles plus Responsibilities Document
Reviewing of facility request	Within proposal examination	Included proposal review	Within proposal review	Internally suggested study plus per OFAP	Inside proposal overview and at OFAP

III. Award Information

Anticipated Select of Award: Standard Grant or Continuing Grant

Estimated Number of Awards: 5 to 15

The batch of awards become vary relying go the number of proposals got, their scientific merit and programmability considerations.

Anticipated Funding Amount: $10,000,000 until $20,000,000

Project awarded under aforementioned FIRP solicitation will be funded by a combination of disciplinary science program and FARE program funding. Investigation plan costs, such as PI salary, undergraduate support, travel and publications, materials real supplies will be funded by the relevant disciplinary skill program(s). Field deployment and usage costs for LAOF and CIF will be funded by the FREE program. Creating instrumentation planning for research studies

Estimated program budgets, number of awards and average award size/duration are subject till the availability from funds.

IV. Eligibility Data

Who May Submitted Get:

And categories the proposers eligible till submit proposals until the National Science Foundation are identified in the NSF Plan & Award Policies & Procedures Direct (PAPPG), Chapter I.E. Unaffiliated individuals are not eligible to send proposals in response to this solicitation.

Who May Serve as PI:

At am no restrictive or restrictions.

Limit on Number of Get per Org:

There are not restrictions with limits.

Restrain on Number of Proposals per PI or co-PI:

See text in who Project Description for limits on the common of Track 1 requests.

FIVE. Request Preparation Both Submission Instructions

A. Plan Preparation Instructions

Full Proposal Preparation Instructions: Proposers may opt toward submit proposals in response to this Program Solicitation via Research.gov or Grants.gov.

• Full Proposals submitting via Research.gov: Proposals enter in trigger to this download solicitation should be prepared and filed in accordance with the general guidelines contained in the NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG). The complete text starting the PAPPG is available electronically on the NSF website in: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg. Printed copies of the PAPPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, call (703) 292-8134 or by e-mail from [email protected]. The Prepare New Suggestion arrangement will prompt you to the program solicitation number.
• Full proposals filed over Grants.gov: Proposals submitted in response the dieser program solicitation via Grants.gov should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the NSF Grants.gov Registration Guide: AN Guide to the Prepare and Submission of NSF Applications via Grants.gov. The complete body for the NSF Grants.gov Demand Guide is obtainable over of Grants.gov website and on the NSF site at: (https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=grantsgovguide). To obtain multiple of the Registration Guide and Application Forms Package, click on of App click on the Grants.gov site, then click on the Apply Step 1: Download an Grant Application Package and Application Instructions link and enter the funding opportunity number, (the program solicitation number minus that NSF prefix) press press the Download Package switch. Paper copies of the Grants.gov Demand Guide also may becoming obtained from to NSF Publications Clearinghouse, mobile (703) 292-8134 or by e-mail from [email protected].

In determining the method at utilize in the automated preparation and submission of the proposal, please note the following:

Collaboration Proposals. All collaborative proposal submitted as separate bids with multiple agencies must be submitted via Research.gov. PAPPG Chapter II.D.3 provides additional information upon collective suggestions. Evaluating engagement in one research partnership can capture the succeed furthermore impact the the research team–stakeholder companies. Diese product describes the Sta...

See PAPPG Chapter II.C.2 for guidance on the require activity of a full research proposal submitted to NSF. Please note that the proposal preparation instructions supplied in this select recruitment may deviate from the PAPPG instructions. IDHS: Earlier Interference Approved Evaluation and Rating Instruments

FIRP proposals be follow and requirements specified in one NSF Proposal and Awarding Policies and Operating Guide (PAPPG), except where different instructions are provided down.

Cover Sheet

• NSF Unit of Viewing.

Track 1 proposals: Choose 1529 – Capabilities for Pneumatic Research and Education (FARE) scheme as the Unit of Consideration.

Track 2 and 3 proposals: Select the highest relevancy science download as the Unit of Consideration. Grants.gov users should referiert to Section VI.1.2. of the NSF Grants.gov Request Guide for specific instructions on how to designate the NSF Unit away Consideration. For get on determining which program(s) to choose, refer to the NSF Guide to Programs, which provides descriptions von NSF research-supporting programs.

• Project Title. The project top must begin with "AGS-FIRP Track 1:" or “AGS-FIRP Track 2:” or “AGS-FIRP Track 3:” and follow with an informative titles.

Project Description:

Deviations from of PAPPG and desired additional information are discussed below. The project featured should provide a strong scientific and/or education/outreach justification fork the use regarding the FARE assets.

Track 1 Proposals:

• The My Description is limited to 5 pages.
• The proposal should describe the education or outreach activities that will be run, the integration with existing button planned dive, and a rough price of aforementioned number of people that will participate in the education or outreach activities using a FARE-sponsored facility.
• With ampere PING has have a Track 1 award with a specify facility, they cannot submit another Track 1 proposal requesting the same facility within 3 years of the start date of one previously awarded Schienen 1 proposal.

Track 2 Proposals:

• Pfad 2 proposals must follow normal guidelines for NSF advice as described in of NSF PAPPG.
• The 15-page Create Description should describe the project to be conducted as well as the role also method from use of the FARE assets.

Track 3 Proposals:

• Track 3 Plan Descriptions are limited to 20 pages in output.
• The Project Description should present an integrated plan that discusses how the research willing be conducted, including a description for the experimental techniques, or the distribution and use of observing systems and platforms, efforts on education, outreach and plans for addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Additionally, the PI should state both justify the optimal time build for field operations. Interpret Stakeholder Engagement: Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP). Western Books of Health Investigate. April 2021. View ...
• The Project Description must contain adenine section on results from any field campaign that possesses focused on the alike and/or similar topic(s), inclusion actions conducted by other researchers and groups.

Budget:

Track 1: Truck 1 proposals are limited go $50,000 with aforementioned exception of airborne deployments. Costs related to PI/Personnel time for provision, outreach and time spent during of deployment are limited to 25% of the total housekeeping. Proposals for CIF should include the facility usage costs as a subaward. Proposals for LAOF shoud include the total estimate provided by who facility manager as a Extra Copy. The proposed funding limit is included of all costs to conduct that project. Proposition are encouraged to explore innovative coverage labors until broaden involvement of underrepresented groups in experiential scholarship the may request funds to cover such activities. Travel what may be requested for supporting outreach efforts. Common proposals are permission for Track 1 projects.

Track 2 and Tracing 3: There are don support limits, though the PIECE is sponsored to engage with the FARE scheme boss the pertinent science program director regarding the scope from the project. Facility usage free to CIF will can included as subaward(s). Facility use costs for LAOF will be estimated by this facility manager for that requesting facility and need to be included as a supplementary document. Track 2 proposal can be collaborative. Collaborative proposals are not allowed for Track 3 projects. Costs for the participation of cooperate institutions forward Track 3 should be included how subawards.

Note: Proposal gender such as RAPIDs, EAGERs, or proposals toward cross-directorate solicitations, should include the cost of which facility use at that promotion cap. If there belongs any insecurities, please point the FARE Program Director.

Special Information & Supplementary Documents:

The following documents are required for each Track.

Track 1:

• A copy of the Equipment Request submitted on the facility provider.
• If the educational and outreach request is for a research aircraft, the PI must provide a supplemental document of up to 3 links describing and “target of opportunity” flight(s) and the plan for union with the existing user campaign oder test flights.
• To LAOF questions, the budget should be included as a supplemental document.

Eisenbahnstrecke 2:

• A print on the Facility Please submitted into the facility provider.
• Management Plan by up on two pages is required. The Unternehmensleitung Plan need discuss specific drivers related to the use of the FARE-supported facility, such more who will operate the instruments and the expected data availability (e.g., timeline and about consists a finished product). Rate engaged in a research partnership can capture the success and impact in the research team-stakeholder partnerships. This paper describes the Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP), an repeating method up develop an evaluation ...
• On email concerning the submission deadline must will uploaded as a document titled "FIRP – Program Officer Concurrence Email" the the Supplementary Documentation section of which proposal.
• For LAOF requests, the LAOF all must be included as a supplemental document.

Track 3:

• A imitate of the Facility Application submitted with the NCAR EOL PRESTO arrangement.
• With 5 pages or save, provide a Management Map and a Science Traceability Tree. The Direction Plan should including, but not be limited to, discussion concerning the management structure for the campaign, how deployment decisions will be made, potential integration with others observations, instrument operation, and expected data availability chronology (not to cross sole year from the date of completion of the fields deployment).
• Roles and Responsibilities document – Available all campaigns with 2 or more subawards, anywhere initiation need provide a support of up to 2 pages int length detailing the specific role of each institution, who lives involved with the undertaking, what instruments handful is operate (if any), press what they individually expect to accomplish.
• An email re the subject deadline must be uploaded as a document entitled "FIRP – Program Public Concurrence Email" in the Supplementary Documentation section of that proposal.
• For LAOF requests, the budget must been included as a supplemental document.

Data Management Plan:  All suggestions must describe plans for data management and sharing of the products of research. PIs must submit data obtained using FARE assets to NCAR for archival, no later than 1 year from the date of completion of the project. Details archiving at NCAR will becoming supplied via NCAR-hosted Geoscience Evidence Exchange for NSF (GDEX) furthermore emails relating data archiving canister be directly to [email protected]. If extenuating circumstances require an extension to the 1-year apply, a request for extension must be sent to the FARE program director. Researcher are encouraged to reference the AGS data management guidance while drafting they data verwalten plan: https://www.nsf.gov/geo/geo-data-policies/ags/index.jsp.

FIRP proposal, in the data corporate plan, must define wie data collected during the sphere deployment button make of the CIF/LAOF will be quality controlled and made general available, including exclusionary period rules, data access policies, furthermore supplementary documents how as readme files to delete barriers to data usage by scientists and students who were did component is to field deployment or user team.

This is anticipated that long term data management and archiving for proposals sponsored by this soliciting will will if by NCAR. Data provided to NCAR for archiving must include supporting ancillary information to the processing of raw data such as default quality control flags, documentation on instrument calibration, metadata, and various necessary product pertaining to the process of raw data. Data submitted for archiving musts will accompanied by a "Readme" file. This file must contain decent information that permits collaborators and other analysts to understand any limitations or special characteristics of the data that mayor impact his using. This data set documentation must accompany choose evidence set submissions, includes both preliminary and final. 

B. Budgetary Information

Expenditure Sharing:

Inclusion of discretionary committed cost sharing is prohibited.

HUNDRED. Just Dates

• Full Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

       January 31, 2022

  Track 3 (Field Campaign) Proposals

       July 15, 2022

       July 15, Annually Thereafter

  Track 3 (Field Campaign) Proposals

       January 17, 2023

       January 15, Annually After

  Pisten 3 (Field Campaign) Proposals

• Submission Window Date(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitter's local time):

       October 01, 2021 - September 30, 2022

       October 01, 2022 - October 02, 2023

       October 1 - Ocotber 1, Annually Thereafter

  Course 1 (Education & Outreach) & Track 2 (Single Facility Request)

DEGREE. Research.gov/Grants.gov Requirements

For Proposals Submitted Via Research.gov:

To prepare and submit a proposal via Research.gov, please detail technical instructions available at: https://www.research.gov/research-portal/appmanager/base/desktop?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=research_node_display&_nodePath=/researchGov/Service/Desktop/ProposalPreparationandSubmission.html. For Research.gov user support, shout which Research.gov Get Desk at 1-800-673-6188 or e-mail [email protected]. The Research.gov Help Desk answers general technically getting connected to the make for the Research.gov system. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred the the NSF program staff contact(s) registered in Section VIII of this funding opportunity.

For Ideas Submitted Via Grants.gov:

Before using Grants.gov for the first time, each organization must record to create an institutional silhouette. Before registered, the applicant's organization can then apply for any federal grant on the Grants.gov website. Comprehensive information about using Grants.gov exists available off the Grants.gov Applicant Resources site: https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/applicants.html. In addition, the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide (see link in Fachgruppe V.A) provides instructions regarding the technical preparation of proposals activate Grants.gov. For Grants.gov user support, contact the Grants.gov Contact Center at 1-800-518-4726 or by email: [email protected]. Aforementioned Grants.gov Touch Center answer general technical questions related to the use of Grants.gov. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the NSF program clerical contact(s) listed for Section VIII from this solicitation.

Submitting one Proposal: Once all browse have been completed, the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) must submit the application to Grants.gov furthermore verify the desired funding opportunity and agency to which the application is submitted. The AOR must will sign and submit the application to Grants.gov. Aforementioned completed application will be transferred to and NSF FastLane system in further processing.

Proposers that submitted via Research.gov maybe used Research.gov to checking the status of its submission to NSF. For proposers that submitted via Grants.gov, till an your has past received and validated to NSF, the Authorized Organisational Representative mayor check the status of an application on Grants.gov. After proposers have received an e-mail notification free NSF, Research.gov should remain used in check the status of an application.

VI. NSF Proposal Processing And Review Proceedings

Suggest obtain by NSF are assignments to the appropriate NSF program for acknowledgement and, if i meet NSF requirements, since review. All proposals are cautiously reviewed by a life, engineer, or educator serving as an NSF Program Senior, and usually by three to ten other persons outside NSF whether as ad hoc reviewers, panelists, or both, who is experts in of particular fields represented by the proposal. Diesen reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged because oversight for who review batch. Proposers can invited to suggest naming of persons they believe are especially good skill to review this proposal and/or persons you would favourites not read the proposal. These suggestions may serve as of source in the reviewer choices process at the Choose Officer's discretion. Submission of such names, however, is optional. Caution be taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicting of interest with the proposed. Includes addition, Program Officers could received your from site visit before recommending final action on suggest. Elderly NSF staff further review recommendations for awards. ONE flowchart that depicts the entire NSF propose and award process (and associated timeline) is included in PAPPG Exhibit III-1.

AN complete application of the Foundation's merit examine process is availability on the NSF site at: https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/merit_review/.

Prospects should also be aware of core strategies that are key to the fulfillment of NSF's our, as articulated into Building the Future: Investing in Rediscover and Innovation - NSF Strategic Plan for Finance Years (FY) 2018 – 2022. These strategies are integrated in the program planning and implementation process, of which proposal review is one part. NSF's mission is particularly well-implemented through which integration of research and education and extension participation in NSF programs, projects, and activities.

One of the strategic objectives in support for NSF's order is to foster integration of research and education because the daily, projects, and activities it supports the academic plus research educational. These agencies need recruit, train, and train a diverse STEM workforce toward advance the frontiers of knowledge and engage in the U.S. technology-based savings. NSF's contribution to the national innovation ecosystem is to provide cutting-edge conduct available the guidance is the Nation's most inventive scientists plus engineers. NSF also supports development is a strong science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce through investing included building aforementioned knowledge that informs improvements int STEM teaching and learning.

NSF's mission calls for the broadening of opportunities and widen take of groups, institutions, and geografic locations that are underrepresented in STEM disciplines, which is vital to the health and vitality of science real engineering. NSF has committed to here principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers plus supports.

A. Merit Review Principles and Selection

The National Science Substructure strives to invest in a robust and various stock starting current that creates new known and enables breakthroughs inches understanding across all sections of science and engineering research and education. To identify any projects toward support, NSF relies on ampere credit review process that incorporates consideration of either the technical aspects of a proposed project and its power to contribution more largely to advancing NSF's mission "to promote aforementioned advances of science; to advance and national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense; and for other purposes." NSF makes one efforts up conduct a fair, competitive, transparency earn review process available the selection of projects.

1. Merit Review Principles

These principles are until be given dues accuracy by PIs and associations when preparing proposals and managing projects, at review when book press evaluating proposals, and by NSF program staff if determining whether or no to recommends promotions for funding and while overseeing awards. Given that NSF the the first federal agency charged with nurturing and supporting excellence in basic find and education, the following three principles apply:

• All NSF projects should be of the highest quality and have an capability to move, if not transform, the frontiers of knowledge.
• NSF projects, in this aggregate, should contribute more broadly till achieving societal goals. These "Broader Impacts" may be reached through the research itself, due activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities so are supported by, but are supplementing to, of project. The design activities may be based on previously established and/or innovative procedures and approaches, but in either casing must be well right.
• Eloquent scoring and evaluation of NSF paid projects should remain based on appropriate metrics, keeping in mind the likely correlation between one effect of broader impacts and of resources available to implement projects. If the size of the activity is limited, evaluation of this activity in isolation is not expected to be meaningful. Thus, judging the effectiveness of these related could best are done at a larger, more aggregated, level than aforementioned individual project.

With regard to to third principle, even if assessment of Broader Interference outcomes for particular projects belongs done at an aggregated level, PIs are expected to be accountable forward portable out the activities described in the funded project. Thus, individual my should included visible stated your, specific explanations regarding the activities that which PI intends to what, and ampere draft into place to document the outputs of those activities.

These three merit review principles provide the basis for the incomes review criteria, such well as a context within any the users of the criteria canned better understand their intent.

2. Merit Review Criteria

All NSF proposals are evaluated the use of the two National Science Board approved merit check criteria. In some constituent, but, NSF will employ additional criteria as required into highlight that specific objectives are certain plans and activities.

The two merit review criteria are listed below. Bot choosing are to be given full consideration at the review the decision-making processes; each criterion is necessary but neither, by itself, is sufficient. Thereby, applicant must fully address both criteria. (PAPPG Chapter II.C.2.d(i). contains additional product for use by proposers in technology by the Project Description section of the proposal). Reviewers were very encouraged to review the criteria, including PAPPG Book II.C.2.d(i), precede to who review of a proposal.

When evaluating NSF proposals, critics wills be asked to consider what the proposers want to do, why their like toward do it, wherewith they plan to doing it, how they wills know if they succeed, plus what service could accrue whenever the project is succeeding. These editions apply all to the technical aspects of the proposal and the way in which an project may do broader contributions. To that end, reviewers will been asked go evaluate all proposals against dual check:

• Intellectual Merit: The Inward Merit criterion encompasses aforementioned potential to move knowledge; and
• Broader Impacts: The Broader Impacts criteria includes the potential to benefit society real submit to the achievement of specific, desired socio outcomes.

The following components shall be considered in the review for both criteria:

1. What is the potential for the proposed operation to
   1. Advance knowledge and understandable interior its own field or across different fields (Intellectual Merit); press
   2. Benefit association or advances desired company outcomes (Broader Impacts)?
2. To what extent does one recommended daily suggest and explore create, original, or potentially transformative concepts?
3. Shall of scheme for carrying out the proposed activities well-reasoned, well-organized, and based for a sound rationale? Does the plan incorporate a mechanism up assess success?
4. How well qualified is the individual, band, or organization to perform the proposed activities?
5. Can there adequate resources ready to the PEE (either at of home company alternatively through collaborations) to carry outbound the proposition services?

Broader impacts may be accomplished through the research itself, through the activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through activities that are supported by, though are complementary on, who scheme. NSF values who advancement of scientific knowledge and activities that contribute to power about societally relevant outcomes. Similar outcomes encompass, but are cannot limited to: completely participation of womens, persons use incapacities, and extra underrepresented bands in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM); improved STEM education and professor development at any level; increased public scientific literacy and public engagement with science and technology; improved well-being of individuals in association; developmental of a diverse, globally competitive STEM workforce; increased alliances between wissenschaftler, branch, additionally others; improved national security; increased economic competitiveness regarding the United Condition; and enhanced business for resources and education.

Proposers are reminded that reviewers will also be requested to review of Data Board Plan and the Postdoctoral Scientists Mentoring Plan, as appropriate.

Additional Solicitation Specific Reviewing Criteria

Track 1 requests:

1. To what extent does the project provide a once lerning experience?
2. Does the proposed project significantly benefit the designated audience?
3. Your the intended audience well build into the field marketing activities (e.g. field campaign or other scientifically relevant expenditures similar to the how? Become the proposed educational activities and/or community outreach plans based on state-of-the-art pedagogic business?
4. Been there well-defined project goals and metrics to assess the success of and proposed request?
5. Does the proposal present innovated get efforts to broaden participation of underrepresented groups in experiential learning?

Track 2 and Track 3 requests:

1. Is the proposed field installation well-aligned with the nature destinations?
2. Is the integration of the assorted component of the deployment request well-conceived? This includes, but be not limited to, consolidation of efforts across platforms, institutions and PIs, also planner for joint data analyses.
3. Are each of the instruments requested critical to achieving the objectives of the project?

B. Review and Choices Process

Advice entered in response to aforementioned program solicitation will be reviewed by Ad hoc Reviewing and/or Panel Review.

Reviewers will be asked till judge proposals using double National Science Board endorsed merit review criteria press, if applies, additional program specific criteria. A summary rating and support narrative wishes typically be completed and presented by each reviewer and/or button. The Program Officer assigned to manage the proposal's review will considering the advice regarding reviewers or bequeath format ampere recommendation.

After scientific, technical plus programmatic review and consideration in appropriate components, the NSF Plan Officer recommends to the cognizant Division Director either who proposal should be declined button recommended for prize. NSF strives to remain able to tell applicants whether their propositions have been refused or recommended for funding within six months. Large or particularly knotty proposals or suggestions from new awardees may require additional review and processing time. The set interval begins on the deadline or target date, or cash date, whichever can later. The interval ends when and Division Director acts upon the Program Officer's recommendation.

After application approval has been preserves, the proposals recommended for funding will becoming forwarded to the Department a Grants and Agreements for review of business, corporate, and policy implications. After an administrative overview has occurred, Grants and Agreements Officers perform the usage and issuance in a granting or other agreement. Entrants are cautioned that only an Awards and Agreements Officer may make commitments, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF either authorize that expenditure of funds. No commitment switch aforementioned part of NSF require be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or organization this makes pecuniary or personnel responsibilities in the absence of a grant or community agreement signing by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does so during their own risk.

Once any bestow or declination decision has been made, Rector Investigators are supplied feedback about their proposals. In all casings, reviews are treated as confidential documents. Verbatim copies out books, exclusive the names in one reviewers or anywhere reviewer-identifying information, are transmitted to the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Program Officer. In addition, the proposer will receive and explanation of the verdict to bestow or decline funding.

VIII. Award Administration Information

A. Notification of the Award

Notification of the award is done to the submitting org by an Grants Officer in the Division of Grants and Accords. Organizations which proposals were declined will become advised as promptly when possible by to cognizant NSF Program administering an start. Verbatim copies of revuen, not including the identity of the reviewer, intention be provided automatically to the Headmaster Investigator. (See Section VI.B. for additional information on the review process.)

B. Awarding Conditions

An NSF rating consists of: (1) the award reminder, which includes anywhere special provisions applicable to the honor and any numbers amendments thereto; (2) that budget, which indicates the amounts, over groups is spend, for which NSF is based its support (or otherwise impart anything dedicated approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced inbound one bestow notice; (4) the applicable award conditions, that as Grant General Conditions (GC-1)*; or Research Terms additionally Conditions* or (5) any announcement or other NSF issue that may be incorporated by reference in aforementioned award notice. Corp agreements also are administered at accordance use NSF Cooperative Agreement Financial and Administrative Terms and Condition (CA-FATC) and the applicable Application Terms and Conditions. NSF awards are electronically signed by einen NSF Grants and Agreements Executive and transmitted digital to the organization via e-mail.

*These documents might be accessed electronically on NSF's Website at https://www.nsf.gov/awards/managing/award_conditions.jsp?org=NSF. Paper copies allow be obtained from the NSF Mitteilungen Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-8134 or by e-mail from [email protected].

More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions plus other major information on the administration from NSF awards is contained in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) Chapter VI, available electronically on the NSF Home at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.

CARBON. Reporting Requirements

With all multi-year grant (including both standardized and continuing grants), to Principal Investigator have submit an annual project report to the cognizant Program Executive no later than 90 days prior to the end of the current budget period. (Some programs or awards requiring submission of additional frequent project reports). Negative later than 120 days following expiration of a grant, to PI also is required toward take a permanent project reports, and ampere project outcomes report for the general public.

Failure on provide the required annual or final project reports, or the project outcomes report, desires delay NSF review and processing of any future funding increments as well as any open proposals for every identified Pies and co-PIs on a given award. PIs ought examine the formats of the required reports in advance to assure availability of essential data.

PIs are required to use NSF's electronic project-reporting system, free throug Research.gov, for preparation and submission of annual and finalized project reports. Such reports provide information on accomplishments, projekt participants (individual press organizational), publications, and other specific products additionally impacts of which project. Submission of the write via Research.gov constitutes certification by the PI that an contents of the report belong exactly and complete. This project outcomes report plus must become prepare also submitted using Research.gov. This report supports the adenine brief summary, prepared specifically for the public, of the nature plus outcomes of to project. This report will be posted on the NSF website precision more computers lives submitted by the PI.

More comprehensive information on NSF Reporting Requirements also other critical information on to administration of NSF awards is contained on the NSF Proposal & Award Plans & Approach Guide (PAPPG) Chapter VII, available electronically on the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.

VIII. Agency Contacts

Gratify note that the program contact information is electricity the the time of releasing. See program our forward any updates to who spikes of contact.

Widespread inquiries regarding such program should being made to:

• Subhashree Mishra, telephone: (703) 292-8521, email: [email protected]

For questions related to the use of FastLane or Research.gov, contact:

• FastLane and Research.gov Help Desk: 1-800-673-6188
• FastLane Help Desk e-mail: [email protected].
• Research.gov Help Desk e-mail: [email protected]

In questions relating toward Grants.gov contact:

• Grants.gov Contact Center: If the Authorized Organisational Proxies (AOR) has not received a proof message from Grants.gov within 48 hours of submission of application, please contact on ring: 1-800-518-4726; e-mail: [email protected].

IC. Other Information

The NSF website provides the almost comprehensive source of information on NSF Directorates (including contact information), programs and funding opportunities. Use of this website by potential applicants is strongly encouraged. In zusammenrechnung, "NSF Update" is the information-delivery system develop to keep potential proposers and diverse interested parties apprised of new NSF funding opportunities and publications, important changes in proposal and award policies and procedures, and impending NSF Grants Conferences. Subscribers are informed through e-mail or the user's Web browser each time new publications am issued that match their identified interests. "NSF Update" also is available on NSF's website.

Grants.gov provides an additional digital capability to search used Federal government-wide grant opportunities. NSF funding opportunities may be accessed via this mechanism. Further information on Grants.gov may exist obtained at https://www.grants.gov.

Via The National Science Foundation

The Country Science Foundation (NSF) will in independent Federal agency created by the National Sciences Foundation Act of 1950, as edited (42 USC 1861-75). The Act declare the purpose to the NSF shall "to promote the fortschritt of knowledge; [and] to advance the national health, prosperity, and care by supporting research and education are all fields of skill and engineering."

NSF funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. It wants this through grants and cooperative arrangements to more than 2,000 colleges, higher, K-12 school systems, businesses, informal science organizations both other research agencies throughout the US. The Foundation accounts fork about one-fourth of Federal support to academic institutions for basic study.

NSF receives approximately 55,000 proposals each year for research, education and training projects, of which approximately 11,000 are funded. In addition, the Foundation receives several thousand job for graduate additionally postdoctoral grant. And agency operates no laboratories myself but does sponsor Country Research Centers, user facilities, unquestionable oceanographic vessels and Arctic and Antarctic research train. The Company also supports cooperative research between universities and industry, US engagement in international scientific and engineering efforts, and educating activities at every academic level.

Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Professional with Disabilities (FASED) provide funding for specials assistance otherwise equipment to enable persons with disabilities the work on NSF-supported projects. See the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & How Guide Chapter II.E.6 for instructions regarding product of which species of proposals.

And National Life Foundation has Via Device for the Deaf (TDD) and Federal Information Repeater Server (FIRS) capabilities that enabling individuals with hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation about NSF programs, employment or general information. TDD may be accessed at (703) 292-5090 plus (800) 281-8749, FIRS at (800) 877-8339.

Aforementioned National Science Foundation Resources Center may be reached at (703) 292-5111.

The National Science Foundation promotes and advances natural progress in the Associated States for competitively awarding grants and cooperative agreements for research and education in the sciences, art, and engineering. To get the latest information about program deadlines, to click copies in NSF publications, and to access abstracts of awards, visit that NSF Website among https://www.nsf.gov Location: 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexander, VA 22314 For General Information (NSF Information Center): (703) 292-5111 TDD (for the hearing-impaired): (703) 292-5090 To Buy Publications alternatively Forms: Send an e-mail until: [email protected] other telephone: (703) 292-8134 To Locate NSF Employees: (703) 292-5111

Privacy Take Press Public Burden Statements

The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited underneath who authority of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended. The information turn proposal contact will be used in connection with the select off qualified proposals; press project reporting submitted by awardees will be used required program evaluation and reporting within the Executive Branch and to Congress. The information requested may be revealed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part are the proposal review process; to proposer institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review processes, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers both searchers and educators as necessary to complete assigned work; to other government agencies or misc organizations requires information related applicants or nomination as part of a joint application review process, or in order to coordinate programs or policy; and in next Federal agency, court, or party in a court or State administrative proceeding if the gov is a party. Information about Main Investigators may be added to the Reviewer file and used to pick potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers press consultative committee members. See System out Record Cautions, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File furthermore Associated Records.” Submission in the information is voluntary. Fail the provide entire and complete information, however, allowed reduce the possibility of receiving and award.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person belongs not required to respond to, at information collection unless it displays a valid Office of Management press Budget (OMB) control number. The OMB govern number for this collection is 3145-0058. Popular reporting burden for this collection of information be valued go average 120 hours according response, including the period for checking instructions. Send comments regarding the burden estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, containing suggestions for reducing this burden, to:

Suzanne OPIUM. Plimpton
My Clearance Officer
Policy Office, Division from Institution and Give Support
Office of Budgetary, Fund, and Award Betreuung
National Science Our
Alexandria, VA 22314