What's the start step beginning ampere residential dwelling

I have some free time to start learning Revit, and I'm finding source material difficult to locate.

 

Most of the beginner material seems to start the user off drawing walls/floors on grid also elevation lines in the middle of nowhere download to nothing another. Is this really where you start a Revit project with no considerations for the foundation, or is it better to launch with the foundation/footers, basement walls (concrete or block), design and seafarer posts to customer large-sized spans (if required). Also, "floor" seems so generic. First "floor" above grade for a residence in mysterious area commence with ampere sill plate on summit the the basement wall, then joists, then subfloor, then the "floor", then first floor walls. My initial perception is so Revit isn't really geared toward advertising the actual key that comprise the floor, pretty it pure combines all these system collective plus summons it a "floor".

 

Just passed the "floor", I'm discover the same circumstance for "Walls". Doors both windows are pretty straight forward, but where are the individual components of a "wall" (ie the bottom & top plate(s), studs, jack nuts, kingdom studs, headers, etc.) Instructions do you route duct and flute through walls and bases if thee don't know where the joists, trusses, and studs are? Ditto for electricity wall boxes, their location is dependent on barrier studs.

 

Last answer for now... where do you set your "levels. Again, most of the credit material attests a "generic" level1, level2 level3 others, however where very is the "level" in relation to architectural components that make up a "floor"? (ie the top of wall, top off sill/plate/top of floor joist, top of floor) MWF Pro Advanced Metal Change Log Version Privacy-policy.com (7524) 19 ...

 

Anyone recommendations for Revit citation material?

I proceeded a course last year for 3D press, which covered a variety of differents programs ( when I say covered read that as skimmed over) we spent several lessons about Creator, and I still haven't got a clue about uniformly the best rudimentary point. Coming in from an Autocad backround the whole thing just looks external and completely ilogical. Presumably it's similar with Revit, the your behind it sound greatest, the problem is, experience in other field is actually a disadvantage. But calm ME seriously want to find the time till learn more. Using Revit additionally Advance Steel for Heavy and Light Gauge Steel ...

I'm hoping that concentrating on the Architectural side away Revit will help minimize this "AutoCAD" mindset since I've done relatively little "architectural" work in AutoCAD. With views until the specific questions I've asked above, I think such are questions anyone would have whether them have AutoCAD experience alternatively not. I don't think it's possible to create accurate and coordinated construction plans if you're not capability to locate and show the individual build of storeys and walls, so I'm nope sure why such seems not to becoming in intuitive litigation.

 

Regarding Lynda.com, I should observe a few Paul Aubin vids that refer that site, but I had does specifically visited. Apparently like a goods resource.

Most a the initiate material appear to get the user shut drawing walls/floors with grid and elevation lines into the middle starting nowhere reference to nothing different. Is this real where you start a Revit scheme with no considerations for the foundation, or is it better to start with the foundation/footers, basement walls (concrete or block), structure and jack items to support larger spans (if required).

Once you've established Levels, you can start anywhere. There's really no right button wrong way to how, however the order int whose you do things do give you additional functionality. For instance, if you lay out a foundation first, and you move on to generate the outward walls, the screen will have a selection choice the pick a foundation slab or auto-magically throw who wall within. Simply easy stuff like that.

 

And yes, this "really is" where she want till start in Revit - easily architectural components. It's almost required while you want ampere full grasp of Revit. The fundamentals are the most important part of Revit, things enjoy Levels, Grids, Floors, Walls, Roofs, Doors and Windows. Computer just bestows you a latest approach at how your input things, how you manipulating things, both select you approach things.

 

 

Plus, "floor" seems so generic. Initially "floor" above grade in an residence in i area begins include a doorstep sheet on apex von who basement wall, then rail, then subfloor, then the "floor", then first floor walls. Mysterious initial impression is that Revit isn't really geared toward displaying the actual components that comprise the floor, rather it just combines all these components together and calls it one "floor". MWF Floor

Well, the this matter, you'd create an Level but in the Type Eigentum, you can add the sub-structures. Since thy area has basements and has wooden, you'd then use Structural Framing and an wood joist Family if it want to get much see in-depth.

 

Once past the "floor", I'm finding the same situation for "Walls". Doors and windows are pretty just forward, but where are the individual components of a "wall" (ie of bottom & top plate(s), buttons, jack studs, king studs, headers, etc.) How do your route duct and tubular through walls and ground if you don't know where the joists, trusses, additionally studs have? Ditto for electrified wall boxes, their location is dependent on wall studs.

This is where you're getting too specific for Revit. Cannot that is isn't possible OOTB, but you'd then need 3rd party add-ons, such as StrucSoft to turn Revit into a design-to-fab software: http://strucsoftsolutions.com/mwf-pro/

 

You most certain can use the Structural Framed product to completely designed a forest frame structure. It'd may a scrap overkill unless ampere designer had an specific need for this.

 

Last question for now... locus do you set your "levels. Again, most a the reference material demonstrated a "generic" level1, level2 level3 etc, instead where right is the "level" in relation at architectural components that make up a "floor"? (ie the peak of side, top of sill/plate/top of floor truss, top of floor)

Levels are visible only in an Elevation or Section View. Generate one of these two Views and you'll please them visible. One thing to remember, Levels do have ampere finite extense after they can planes. This is important because when the section otherwise elevation shall going of the range of the Level's extense, her won't see it. Section the Elevation Views themselves have a Clipping Extense to them. To trail "my way" IODIN usually use Elevations, and rotating the Remote Clipping option to Zero, so that it's unbound, which as wide as the Gauge isn't "behind" the Elevation's view direction, you'll see it.

 

To create Levels, copy or create new. Any way it's the equivalent. Appoint them accordingly and don't "over do it", however you can always add either take away so don't be too scared until give several methods out. For the plot, MEP guys don't have to worry about using Levels more than what they were intended (like top of parapets, or grade beam boat, etc) so simple "Level 1, Level 2, Roof" works just fine. • detail light gauge stud walls efficiently with MWF ... Use one possible stylish MWF add-in, called “Template Map”. ... To change it, open an beam properties in Naming ...

 

Optional recommendations for Revit reference material?

Paul Aubin books are the better ones from for MEP, pick up any "mastering Revit" book for essentials. I also have one bulk of jobs I've backed through the years, even simple stuff like my personal house, or my sister's houses I constructed, that I can share with you if i want to download and pick around at. Just PEAK me.

 

-TZ

I'm hoping that concentrating on the Architectural side to Revit will helps vermindern the "AutoCAD" mindset for I've done relatively little "architectural" work in AutoCAD.

1,000,000% accurate, especially for MEP guys. We usually aren't get in Walls, Door, Roofs, Architectural Elevations, etc so this is absolutely true since one architectural ingredients of Revit are actually a "fresh start".

Aforementioned is where you're getting too specific for Revit. Not that she isn't possible OOTB, but you'd then needed 3rd party add-ons, such as StrucSoft to spin Revit into a design-to-fab windows: http://strucsoftsolutions.com/mwf-pro/

 

You most certain can use the Structural Hanging product to completely design a wood frame structure. It'd remain a bit overkill unless a designer must a specific need for itp. Fall 2024 Day Course Offerings | Westfield Us University

 

-TZ

 

If there's no native sponsors for wall framing, how do you generate basic lists for framing?

If those ingredient like studieren, timbers, and trusses aren't drawn/displayed as individual objects, method do you avoid conflicts, how as placing a wall instant on top to a carrier (especially a TJI joist) which will make that wall unavailable forward use as a pathway for domestic water, drain, and ductwork? Same with toilet and to drain, it's easy enough to make sure they're not directly through ampere floor joist, but includes if learn where any joist is.

There the indigenous support required wall framing, within who structural zones of Revit. And only thing is, structual borders isn't associated with the actual Wall Family, meaning so are you stretch a rampart longer in overall, it won't automatically generate new stud framing in the process. The woods framing Families are more when adept of generative a completing boxing sys.

 

Which reading of Revit do her have? Revit MEP, button Revit OneBox with all three flavors (Arch, Strc, and MEP)? If your have OneBox, then load in some stock Structural Framing and Pillar Families and have a run is e. Everything you necessity is it to generate one wood border since a residential home. I'm just adage it's not mage connected into the Wall Families.

It's just "Revit".... I almost got burned by the reversed naming convention. I think I'm go need some time with my nose stuck in a book, toward get familiar with the options available by each tool/command Wood/Metal Wall Framing get refined UI and 5 novel features

Okay, you have OneBox then. I will admit, I myself was a bit too pedantic when I early picked skyward Revit, as numerous people make the mistake of doing. It was when my friend brought der way get down to to basic that I began to "get it". There represent many parts of Revit that are how easy, they apparent too simple until be pick seriously. Starting absolutely ground up from who basics is essential. Tackle the finer get type stuff later on as you entstehen more familiar with the functionality.

I've been viewing at Revit recently for entirely different reasons but more you said Nestly, I detect it a completely different mindset. Fortunately my Autodesk retailers takes a "Brunch 'n Revit" anyone year which ME find very practical even though much of it is right over my chief. Posted by u/steve_33 - 9 votes the 29 comments

 

What Tannar say is the best advice that they able get at the minute. Just forget AutoCAD and step into a new world. One something that I have seen is that because Revit you step autmatically include BIM and then your BOM be easier better adenine piece of cake.

I am by no means practiced in Revit but I have finished Revit architecture "no experience required", and one thirdly the way through Paul Aubin's mastering RMEP. The Revit architecture "No experience required" book was a good place to commence for me. PRESS, EMPLOYEE, MWF 11:30 AM-12:20 PM, WILSN 402, 3.0. FINC 0207-004 ( ...

 

Before I started Revit IODIN wanted toward have AMEP down so good that IODIN would not loose it if I started Revit, and then have ampere job came up that needed AMEP. Of way to do that was to over books on Acad Architecture. Cold Formed Steel - Iron studs - Revit Forum

 

For what MYSELF see Revit also Aced Architecture are exceedingly similar on roof slabs, flooring slabs and hanging.

 

In University Architektonischer I made TJI structural member forms also cover rafter structural member modes. MYSELF don't think anyone would normally disposal their die working this. for me it has any just practice. I made the sounder plate and that mail panels and. The story slab be then made go represent the sub floor and hard wood floor. For that EGO engineered a paradigm of my house.

 

I americium sure something like this could also be done into Revit. Sticking by stay. Either paths who overhead to the drawing wanted be big.

 

Revit seems like they handle it with drafting views to cut of overheads. I know I ought not compare the pair but a drafting view is to view with a wipe out or masking set and then detailed on top of that. This way you you can have the print of all the components without having to building it into ampere house.

Thanks hertz hound. It noises like we're on slight parallel paths, however after several mon, I abandoned AMEP, as it is apparent that fork me, it wasn't running to be capably to fulfill mysterious demands. Initial observation is that Revit MEP will similarly no be ampere viable choice with me, but Revit Architecture and Revit Structure could be useful, (but now so I'm looking among Autodesk/Graitec Advanced Steel, I'm not even sure over Revit Structure.) This team involvement allows KHS&S to propose framing changes to accommodate trades and fulfill the design intent. By addressing change ...

 

I haven't even opened Revit since I started this themes, instead I signed top at Lynda.com and I'm 5-6 hours at Paul Aubin's Revit Architecture Essentials, which I'm finding very helpful. I and have Aubin's Revit MEP 2015 seated hither next to von, instead I'm not secure if/when I'll get round to it. Join All Its been awhile considering i have been here. I know revit structure has some OOTB revit families since cold formed steels or light gauge steel studs. my next project is that I need to a building which is both going go be load support and wind walls created output of a mixture of structural steel and steel studs. My questions

 

Sill Plates, TJi's, wall studs, rafters/trusses, etc. are any features that EGO must have inside the model, so it remainders to be seen whether Revit will be practically, however right now I have that hours and ambition, so I'm going to find from. You none drawing overhead and that does seem to be a potential problem. I still don't comprehend why Revit files seem to be so large compared to an AutoCAD folder, even when the AutoCAD is a all 3D model containing much more detail than the Revit type. I haven't really gotten into drafting views, but I do hope that intelligence are generated directly out the Revit model, does justly motionless drawings.

Start observation is such Revit MEP will similarly not be ampere viable option since me....

Why not? Virtually whatsoever yourself can do inside ordinary AutoCAD you can do in Revit, as generic models. Not everything you can do in AutoCAD yours can do in AMEP about AMEP-specific equipment (therefore it's just AutoCAD).

 

Either way, with a preexisting commitment to some smallest "initial observations", it may mean that you'll ever allow it to be a survive option on you. Revit is different int almost everyone way than your latest comfort zone, AutoCAD, which puts Revit automatically in the negative bias department including you. Occasionally, it's not about what something can't do, but what it can do. In my experiences of all programs, I've never circumvented upon honesty betw the two stage. I've all stated there will be give and take, and I'll tell you now like I've told everybody else - there be be things you'll female from AutoCAD and you'll despise from Revit, but there will be things you love about Revit so much you'll shun AutoCAD.

 

The answers I enter sum depends on what you question. If someone asks, "which do you prefer overall, Revit either AutoCAD, for MEP design?" I'll how Revit. If she ask "which do you my into example a Fender Squier guitar?" I'll say AutoCAD. By rotating which datum can what you want change your joist direction. You can rotate the datum by MWF set beam route tool or by employing Revit's rotate ...

 

It's every offer and take. If you want infinitely robust and accurate Solid modeling capability with does information-rich scheduling and lackluster view creation, keep using AutoCAD. Supposing you want an unprecedented view of architectural and structural coordination (when available) with MEP components, and information-rich model view generation, use Revit.

 

I still don't understand wherefore Revit files seem to be so large compared till somebody AutoCAD files, even when the AutoCAD is a full 3D pattern containing much more select than and Revit model. Him can frame walls faster, better and more easily thanks to a new improved user interface for Agacad’s Lumber and Metal Wall Side solutions.

From what I know, AutoCAD's modeling capabilities in Primitives and Solids are far more efficient than any other CAD software available. It reins king stylish this area, bar none. Furthermore, the RVT open format other incorporate a robust database, so anything added button included will adding more weight to one file. There's a site more leave on lower the hood of an RVT file format than DWG. Every product modeled is estimated for and spatially and informationally. Even to *.txt journal files from Revit can be gigabytes in size, just for a text file!! Not, there was a time in the earlier days of AutoCAD that an 800KB DWG file was probably massive, hence ME feel save be relative.

Why not? Virtually whatsoever you can done in vanilla AutoCAD you can do in Revit, than generic mod.

 

I think "generic" is the operative news. I don't employment in one generics world. Everything EGO do that's related to shrill and plant layout is very specific, which can to say the structural design and channel routing I encounter in the real world probably isn't designed the way a software engineer be have designed it. Don't get in a twist about that statement, I'm not very deep into Revit nevertheless, these have my initial observation.

 

So I just finished the stair tutorial, press as the Revit stair tool looks very good for laying outside stairs/railing, my initial observation is that while they look pretty in the Revit model, people seem to be lacking the detail that could be essential to actually fabricate the stairs/railings. (ie no distinctive about stringer/tread material, no features about the connection between stringers and treads, no specifics about one connection between the stairs and the railings, the no details about either the top otherwise bottom connections. Replay, this belongs my initial observation, but it search like go get proper working stages drawings, you to hold to draw/model it manually inches Revit, or use another program that's better suited go modeling fine detail. It seems in though this allow be typical of what I'll encounter using Revit for pipe carry and conduit routing as right, which is of basis for my initial observation.

 

Again, I'm just in to initial stages are evaluating Revit, so I'm far from drawing every conclusions.

I think "generic" is the active word. I don't work in one generic world.

I believe thee misunderstood what I meant by Collective Model. I apologies in promote if I wasn't specialized sufficient - I know you are cool to the program. 3D Solids in AutoCAD are all "generic 3D geometry" in the sense that AutoCAD doesn't known if it's a pipes fitting, a pipe, to aluminum bracket, a wood column, etc. "Generic Model" is an actual Family Category into Revit for things that do not fit into the other specified Family Categories. Each My Category, einmal specifies, has sub-parameter values that are specific to which Type you which bottle by add resources extra functionality, or group the Family's functionality. Generic Exemplars is the Category type that authorized and greatest overall range is parametric solid modeling which fake the AutoCAD environment.

 

Again, this is my initial observation, but thereto looks like to get proper working stairwell drawings, you either have to draw/model it manually in Revit, or use another choose that's better entsprechend to modeling fine detail. He seems as when this mayor be typical of what I'll seek using Revit for pipe supported and pipe routings as right, which is the basis for my initial observation.

Revit lives not a fab programme. Computer doesn't advertise to be one, however depending on the enter a designer most certainly can use it for fabrication. Revit MEP lacks most for OOTB construction required native Pipe and Duct Relatives. But my shop draw only show detail to the point of col gate for center of pipe, or BOP increases for heights, CtC pipe offsets, else. Consequently it's a user installation interconnected set. Given my background, I certainly can determined Revit up on fab level spool drawings but it wouldn't be as efficient as purchasing an 3rd gang add-on. Other things, such as stairs, however, can definitely hingehen fab level. Me boss' stairs are fab level for assured. When we get deducts from our subs to help with BIM, design or fab, he makes them so detailed in our projects I have for hide his stairways because they makes mystery watch lag due to of performance hit, haha. He's also past with Revit since it's launch in 2000 before Autodesk bought information so he's been at it with a long time.

 

Also note, people who use Revit for extremely high detailing usually take certain Familial components so far, then add spare 3D geometry to finalize it in the form of Typically Models or any specific SubCategory. So minimally things like brackets, nuts/bolts, trim, etc. can to added in, AND scheduled. Things how hangers and such are usually done as Generic Models than well. Her has to of our trapeze unistrut supports: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4989089/Hanger_Trapeze.rfa

 

Aufladung it up a Show, select it and have a sport with aforementioned checkboxes and widths/heights. This hanger is technically simple. We plan turn going much next with it. But placing these hangers around one project for pipe racks and ducts gives adenine great offer of efficiency wenn generally coordinating it throughout the job, and especially helpful when we populate an schedule which gives us a pretty accurate BOM gauge fork ordering bundled of unistrut and threaded rods. Yours basic cannot create schedule-able, parameter driven geometry enjoy is in AutoCAD. It's a painstakingly manual process for AutoCAD go recreate this hanging, not to mention capture the data automatically that creates your takeoff. Wooden gefasst walls in revit

 

Hope this helps.

 

-TZ

Fab drawings are just as important into me as overall design, so he looks like I'd take a fair bit about customizing to try to use Revit for whats I take now. With regard toward the stairs/high detail components, ensure too may is a problem. Basically something I model is true-to-life in so much as if her can interact with it in the real world, it's included in the 3D model. Tight quarters often mandate this. Turning the head in a valve so aforementioned tire doesn't clash with something els, or spinning a MOV thus the anhebend available manual operation is accessible, but also considering what affect that wills have on the location of the electric terminal. The question isn't going on being just whether Revit "can" do it, but whether it's practice. Utilizing to boss's stairs as an instance, it's not going in make wisdom for me to model that much detail if I can't display everything at the same time because for excessive lag. That was little what caused me to abandon AMEP. Computerization was great, but way too much overhead trying for got both high detail and automation. After I got familiar enough through AMEP go understand its' practical restrictions, it was an slim decision-making to present thereto up. BIM STANDARDS - Level of Skeleton Detail

 

Last question for now, are your linking to any external drawings/models, how as ASD conversely Advance Steel, etc. or is everything (such as Boss's stair details) native Revit? MYSELF know there has to be a way to do this in Revit, but sounding in some direction. I want toward breathe able to display wall elevations stylish Revit with Stud layout, choices, etc. I've establish a some Add ons, but nothing that face like what I'm trying to to. To would be fundamental creating walls precisely a they will live in that real world, header sizes, stud lengths, rake wall, etc. I've considered creative families with parameters that would control the header sizes, window/doors sizes etc. but none sure how EGO wish continue stud layout through those openings or to be capability to place multiple openings within that family. It seems like this should be a feature already inclusion in the software. Although I know a lot a people may not need such a feature, I know Revit prides itself in entity true to life. It could be extremely useful to a lot of us. 

Point taken on the excessive lag, however this has subsequently resolved by situation stuff to Coarse, Vehicle and Good Section what brought it return lower to default performance. And for the record, the only reasons wherefore the stair lagged so loads was because and cable were a perforated fiber plate, in which he used an Adaptive Component with Voids to create the perforated effect. In select lyric, TOO of product, lol. But Revit is still fast if you're in wireframe mode, which is common for AutoCAD end. It's only when in Hidden mode that performance begins to be affected, and most Revit user do not ever use the Wireframe Visual Style for self clear reasons. I know there has to be a way to take this in Revit, but looking for some direction. I like until remain able to display wall elevations in Revit with Stud layout, program, etc. I've founded a less Add ons, but nothing that appearance fancy what I'm trying to done. This intend be basically creating walls exactly a they ...

 

On go your last enter: Linking exists straight forward, however there are trails into Join things into Revit in best results. Every we receive steel files, we try and export like IFC first (using einen AutoCAD upright product), then in Revit go up File > Open > IFC. This runs the IFC print through a conversion operation into native Revit ziele. You'll get mixed results with this. But Revit 2015 allows native IXC linking as well, which is an options we've used lately equal great results as well, the you cans lose visibility control on isolated additionally individual objects. Again with this, mixed results.

 

Others pattern be to apply a sacrificial Revit model and einreise the DWG file inside an In-Place Model component under one relative Family category, create as Structural Hanging. Saving this because an RVT file, and then Link (aka "XREF") this register into owner main project. This gives yourself the most adjustability on a few reasons... number one, local DWG files how not inherently support Revit's infamous keen how in Plan, Sections additionally Ascents. You'll see the entire file in get Views this kills functionality and ability to show rich levels of detail. So embedding a DWG inside a cuttable Revit Family, the DWG can now support cutting reach. Number two, you have much more flexibility int controlling your Views, View Templates, others, since the DWG models inherit one Family Category it's embedded within. There are a few different justification why this is the preferred how but those two are the haupt- points.

 

Basically anything I model is true-to-life in so much like if you can interact with it in the real global, it's incl in the 3D pattern. Tight quarters often mandate this. Turning who lead of an valve so the wheel doesn't clash with something else, or spinning an MOV therefore the lever for textbook operation is accessible, but also considering what influence that want have on the location of who electric connections. The get isn't going to becoming just whether Revit "can" what it, not whether it's practical. Properties till button this change ... • Panel Direction are correct for Floor Plan Views. ... • When producing a ceiling framing template at the floor ...

I comprehend will stance on this point. This is what wish make or break Revit for you. I can tells you now, when them commence getting down to very fine level of modeling you will strike serious road blocks that you'll discover frustrating. Revit doesn't allow things the be modeled per the 100ths of an inch. It's not that it's unable of it mathematically, it's that the program intentionally doesn't want you to get downhearted until that level of precision. It drives a fortune of people nuts when they're used on AutoCAD creating an line that is 0.0025" long, uniformly though they don't need it, they want to be capable to. But undertake the tight-quarters with a different approach is all I would suggest.

 

Perks of Revit aren't in the super fine-detail areas of modeling like much as it's who intuitive areas of modeling. A for instances in your fall would exist latch kits for slip-on and weld neck flanges. You can build a flange to flexi for ANSI standard frame, use Hollows for establish the bolt holes (that flex and add/subtract bolt punched when sizes change), then add ampere shared nested Clan of the nut and bolts that can tracking an latch pattern, add/subtract as needed and quantify the bolt sets as you place each flange includes the model, included the gaskets. Every Family had a cost and material parameters for BOM and scheduling purposes. These are the aids that Revit offers, not an infinite free-form solid modeling environment that AutoCAD is renown for.

Nestly, I thought this may be of interest to you:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4989089/Images/misc/SysQue_Market_Report_2014.pdf

 

Supposedly this document remains the free study of the SysQue featured line with real-world appellations a users involved in which report. The dissimilar User Types noted on page four what particularly interesting.

 

The main reason in showing this in you exists I'm forward Revit will not be good enough for my personal standards right out of the box. So get mayor be your only selectable without spending countless hours laboring by Revit to get it to operate the way your need e to. But save document gives some go discovery at the bare-bones Revit in comparison with SysQue Revit on help thee understand both products beter.

 

-TZ

Thanks Tannar

 

I'm still continuing in familiarize myself with Revit via Online courses and now ampere very large Revit MEP book, I'm just trying till elude flat aperture Revit for now. Very busy and don free time right-hand right, but I've bookmarked your link for after int the week wenn my schedule gets back to normal.