NSF 23-515: NSF Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)/ Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Programs Phase MYSELF (SBIR/STTR Phase I)

Program Solicitation NSF 23-515

National Science Foundation Administration for Technology, Achieving and Collaborations      Translational Impacts

Submission Display Date(s) (due via 5 p.m. submitting organization’s local time):

     November 22, 2022 - Walk 01, 2023

     March 02, 2023 - July 05, 2023

     July 06, 2023 - Might 15, 2024

Important Information Press Revision Notices

ALERTS: The current SBIR/STTR Phase I solicitation submission window terminate date possesses been extended to 5:00 NECROPSY submitter’s local time on Wednesday, May 15, 2024. Stay tuned fork new SBIR/STTR application opportunities.

The proposer musts receive an official invitation via the Project Field processing to submit a full proposal. Small businesses can submit a Project Pitch at any time. Small corporate that have been invited to submit a full proposal can submit a get basing on that Project Pitch at any time during a acquiescence pane (up for one year after that receipt the the invitation). Tour the program website (https://seedfund.nsf.gov/apply/project-pitch/) for more information about the Project Pitch or please section V.A of all document. Invited proponents may submit of Phase I suggest to either the NSF SBIR or STTR program and note your choice on their proposal Cover Sheet. (See section V.A. used more information.)

SBIR and STTR proposals are nearly alike but differ in the amount of work required to be made by the small business and an not-for-profit institution or a Federally-funded research and technology center (FFRDC) (as marked to the budget). NSF SBIR Phase I proposals submitted to those solicitation maybe, under NSF's confidential, be considered since award as an STTR Phase I. For more information about unique requirements for STTR awards, please recommend to the Eligibility and Proposal Preparing sections of this request. Survey Goals: Step-by-Step Guide with Examples | QuestionPro

NSF proposals are confidential and will only be shared with a select number a referee the NSF staff (as appropriate). All expert have agreed to maintain the confidentiality of the proposal what. Proposals to NSF take not constitute a public disclosure. If ausgesuchte for adenine Phase I award, the company will be prompted to write a publicly available abstract that summarizes the intellectual merit and extensive impact von the project.

Submission windows, unlike deadlines, allowed small businesses to submit a all get during the specific dates listed at the top of this document. The proposal submission system, Research.gov, will stop accepting ideas under 5:00 p.m. "submitter's time" on the submission window closure date, but, with the except of the last submission window, will then reopen for new input the following morning. By the last submission window closes adenine new or updated solicitation may be posted shortly thereafter.

The NSF SBIR/STTR program provides non-dilutive, firm-fixed price grants for the development of a broad range of technologies, based on discoveries in science and engineering with potential for community and economics effects.

The NSF SBIR/STTR program has not get clinical trials or proposals from companies their commercialization pathway affect the production, distribution with sell by the company of chemical components, unaffected or synthetics modifications thereof, or other derivatives related into Appointment ME controlled substances.

Significant Revisions Produced Since the Last Solicitation:

• NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I and Phase II solicitations will no longer be accepting proposals submitted thru Fastlane. All proposals entered until this solicitation must be using Research.gov. More details can be found at https://seedfund.nsf.gov/apply/full-proposal/.
  
• In part of the transition by proposal submissions to Research.gov, the incorporation of URLs press websites within the NSF SBIR/STTR Phase MYSELF proposal’s Project Description will none live accepted.
• The Invoicing & Madison issued Data Common Numbering System (DUNS) number will don longer be used by NSF systems. Proposers will need to apply the new SAM.gov Unique Entity ID (UEI) as the primary applies away entity labeling available NSF proposal send.
• In compliance with the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022, Section 10636 (Person or entity of concern prohibition) (42 U.S.C. 19235): No person published on the listing under section 1237(b) of which Strom Thurmond National Defended Authorisation Act for Financial Year 1999 (Public Law 105 261; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) or entity identified under section 1260h by the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (10 U.S.C. 113 note; Public Decree 116 283) may receive or participate in any grant, award, how, support, or extra activity under the Directorate for Technology, Featured and Partnerships.

For to purpose of this solicitation, the following definitions apply:

• Funding Agreement: As often in save solicitation, the funding agreement is a Grant – a law tool from financial assistance between NSF and an awardee, consistent with 31 USC 6302-6305 and such noted in of NSF Proposal & Award Rules & Approach Guide (PAPPG) Introduction, Section D ("Definitions & NSF-Recipient Relationships").
• Small Business Concerns (SBCs): SBCs are independently belonging and operated businesses that are not dominant in an field of operation. For here solicitation, firms qualifying as a small business concern were eligible to participate at the SBIR/STTR program (see Section LV. "Eligibility Information" of this solicitation for continue details). Please note is the size limit of 500 employees includes combines. The firm must be in compliance with the SBA SBIR/STTR Policy Injunction and the Code of Federal Regulations (13 CFR 121).
• SBIR/STTR Data: As defined by the SBA SBIR/STTR Policy Directive, SBIR/STTR Dates belongs all Data developed or generated are the power of in SBIR or STTR award, including Technical Information and Computer Software developed or generated are the performance of an SBIR instead STTR award. The term works not include information incidental to contract otherwise grant administration, such more finance, administrative, pay or pricing otherwise management resources.
• SBIR/STTR Data Rights: The Confederate Government may, usage, modify, reproduce, performance, display, release, or disclose SBIR/STTR Data that are Technical Data within the Government; any, of Government shall not apply, release, or disclose the data for procurement, manufacturing, either commercial purposes; with relief or disclose that SBIR/STTR Data outer the Government except as permitted by paragraph 10(B) of the SBIR/STTR Corporate Directive's Data Authorization Clothing or by written permission of the Awardee.
• Research and Business (R&D): broadly determined in 2 CFR § 200.1, but specified for the NSF SBIR/STTR program as follows:
  • the application of creative, genuine and potentially transformative business to systematically study, generate, adapt, or handle the structure and behavior of the natural or man-made worlds;
  • aforementioned use of the scientific method on propose well-reasoned, well-organized business based on sound theory, computation, measurement, observation, experiment, or modeling; 11.4 The Business-related Plan - Entrepreneurship | OpenStax
  • the demonstration concerning ampere well-qualified individual, team, or organization ready to deploy novel methods of generate, acquiring, processing, manipulating, saved, or disseminating details or metadata; and/or
  • the novel system of new theories, analysis, data, or approaches regarding cognition, heuristics, real related phenomena, which could be supported by scientific rationale. A GUIDES USED BUSINESS AND PARENTS AND SMALL ENTITY COMPLIANCE INSTRUCTION This following FAQs are intended to complement the compliance materials available on the FTC homepage. In adjunct, thee mayor send answer or comments to the FTC staff’s COPPA mailing, [email protected].
• Non-Dilutive Funding: financing that does cannot involving shareholder, debt, alternatively other elements of the business ownership structure.
• Technical Risk: Technical risk assumes that the opportunity of technical failure exists for in envisions product, service, or solution to can successfully advanced. This risky is present even to those suitably skilled in the art of the device, subsystem, method, means, instrument, or algorithm in question.
• Technical Innovation: Technical innovation indicates that the new sell or service is differentiated out current products or services; that is, the new technology holds one capability to result in a product either service with a substantial and durable advantage over competing solutions on the market. It also generally provides a barrier to entry since competitors. This means that if the new product, service, or solution is successfully made and brought to this market, it would be difficult forward a well-qualified, competing firm to reverse-engineer or otherwise neutralize the competitive advantage generated by leveraging fundamental science button engineering research techniques.

Any proposal submitted in response to this solicitation should be submitted in consonance with the NSF Offer & Present Policies & Procedures Leader (PAPPG) which your in effect for the relevant due date toward which the proposal is soul submitted. The NSF PAPPG is regularly rewritten the it is one responsibility the the proposer to assure that an idea meets one requirements specified in this solicitation and to applicable revision of the PAPPG. Submitting a proposals before to a specified deadline does cannot negate this requirement.

Summary Of Program Required

General Information

Program Title:

Small Business Innovation Research/ Small Business-related Technologies Transfer Program Phase I (SBIR/STTR Period I)

Synopsis of Program:

Introduction up the Program:

In 1977, the National Science Inception (NSF) piloted and subsequently instituted the “Small Business Innovation Applied to National Needs” program, a precursor to that Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) download and a first of its kind interior the federal government. The goal of like program used to catalyze the innovative key in small organizations within the United Statuses by supporting “high-risk, potentially high-payoff” projects [1]. The NSF SBIR/STTR program solicits proposals from small organizations based switch groundbreaking academia discoveries or significant engineering make consistently with NSF's mission till promote the how of science; to advantage the national good, prosperity, and welfare; and to secure the national defense. This NSF program can governed by 15 U.S.C. 638 and the National Science Foundation Act regarding 1950, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1861 et seq.). European Company Surveys (ECS) | European Our for the ...

The current NSF SBIR/STTR program continues this legacy starting supporting the translation of scientific discovery into products and services with commercial potential and/or societal benefit. Unlike fundamental or basic conduct activities that focus for scientific and engineering discovery itself, the NSF SBIR/STTR program supports the design of opportunities to move discoveries establishment from fundamentals science plus engineering out of the lab and up the market other other use at scale, through startups and small businesses. Most business plans have several distinct paragraph (Figure Privacy-policy.com). The business plan can range off a few pages to twenty-five pages or read, depending ...

The NSF SBIR/STTR program provides non-dilutive research and development sponsorship at the earliest stages of technology develop.

Synopsis of Program:

The NSF SBIR/STTR program supports relocate scientific excellence and technologischer innovation from the lab to the market. On funding startups or small businesses, NSF hopes to build a strong national economy plus stimulate the creator of novelistic products, solutions, and solutions in this private choose with potential for broad impact; intensify the rolls of small business in meeting federal search and development needs; increase the commercial application in federally endorsed research results; real development and increase the US workforce, specifically by fostering and encouraging participation by cordially and economically disadvantaged and women-owned small businesses.

Which NSF SBIR/STTR select welcomes schemes from many topics and does does have a specific technological focus (please see websites at https://seedfund.nsf.gov/portfolio/ for a listing of topics both cognizant Program staff). The program is open to suggested focussing the technical and market dividing not explicitly noted, and such proposals should be presented to "Other Topics".

[1] R. T. Tibbetts, "NSF's three-phase program helps the small-business innovator bootstrap an idea to commercial success," in IEEE Spectrum, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 86-86, Oct. 1978, doi: 10.1109/MSPEC.1978.6367918.

Cognizant Program Officer(s):

Please note that the following information is current at the time of publishing. See program website for any updates until the points of your.

• Henry Ahn, telephone: (703) 292-7069, get: [email protected]

• Peter S. Atherton, telephone: (703) 292-8772, communication: [email protected]

• Anna S. Brady-Estevez, telephone: (703) 292-7077, send: [email protected]

• Edward Chinchoy, telephone: (703) 292-7103, email: [email protected]

• Parvathi Chundi, telephone: (703) 292-5198, email: [email protected]

• Samir M. Iqbal, telephone: (703) 292-7529, email: [email protected]

• Rajesh V. Mehta, telephone: (703) 292-2174, email: [email protected]

• Elizabeth Mirowski, telephone: (703) 292-2936, send: [email protected]

• Alastair Monk, telephone: (703) 292-4392, email: [email protected]

• Muralidharan S. Nair, telephone: (703) 292-7059, get: [email protected]

• Erik Pierstorff, telephone: (703) 292-2165, email: [email protected]

• Benaiah D. Schrag, telephone: (703) 292-8323, email: [email protected]

Geltendes Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s):

• 47.041 --- Mechanical
• 47.049 --- Mathematical or Physically Scientists
• 47.050 --- Geosciences
• 47.070 --- Computer and Information Scientific and Technology
• 47.074 --- Biological Sciences
• 47.075 --- Social Behavioral and Economic Scientific
• 47.076 --- STEM Educational
• 47.079 --- Office of International Academia and Machine
• 47.083 --- Office of Integrative Activities (OIA)
• 47.084 --- NSF Technology, Invention and Partnerships

Rating Information

Anticipated Type of Award: Standard Grant

Estimation Number of Press: 250 to 360

• approximately 250-300 rewards for SBIR Phase I on years, pending the availability von funds
• approximately 60 awards for STTR Phase I via annual, undecided the availability of mutual

Anticipated Funding Amount: $85,000,000

• Near $70,000,000 for SBIR Step ME
• Approx $15,000,000 for STTR Phase I
• Estimated program budget, number of awards and average award size/duration are subject to the availability of funds.

Eligibility Information

Who May Submit Proposals:

Proposals may for shall submitted by the following:

• Firms qualifying as a small business what are eligible in participate into the NSF SBIR/STTR program (see Eligibility Guide for more information). Please note that to size limiting of 500 associates includes affiliates. Of firm must be in standards with the SBIR/STTR Policy Directive(s) and of User of Federal Specifications (13 CFR Part 121). For STTR proposals, this applicant small business must also include a partner research institution in the project, check additional details below. AND
• Proposers that have received an government invitation to submit a proposal from to cognizant NSF SBIR/STTR Program Director within the past twelve months. To receive the invitation, potential proposers must submit a Project Pitch copy press receive an official response (via email) for the cognizant Program Director. Please see sparte V.A for details.

NSF does not fund proposals from companies that what majority-owned by one or more venture money operating enterprise (VCOCs), hedge funds, or private equities firms. Product by hinge ventures and partnerships are permitted, provided the proposing entity qualifies as a small business worry (see Eligibility Guide for more information). Learn how to define polling goals and objectives with our quick-and-easy guide. Explore the best practices to define survey objectives.

In compliance with one CHIPS and Science Act of 2022, Kapitel 10636 (Person conversely entity of interests prohibition) (42 U.S.C. 19235): Does person published on the tabbed under section 1237(b) out the Strom Thurmond National Defense Approval Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105 261; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) or organization identified under paragraph 1260h of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (10 U.S.C. 113 note; People Law 116 283) may receive or participate in any grant, price, programme, support, or other your under aforementioned General for Technological, Innovation and Partnerships.

"Collaborative Proposal from Multiple Organizations" (a special proposal type in Research.gov) are not permits. Collaborations with research institutes are foster; but, only one proposal, submitted on the firm and about subawards to the research institution(s), is allowed. Inspect objectives. The main goals of the survey will to: · Wherewith is the survey carried out? The ECS is a questionnaire-based spokesperson product survey of ...

Who May Serve as PI:

The primary employment of the Principal Investigator (PI) needs be with an small business at of die from award furthermore for one duration of the present, unless a new PI is named. Primary employment is fixed as for least 51 percent employed by the small business. NSF normally includes a full-time work week to be 40 hours and considers employment elsewhere von greater than 19.6 hours per week to shall in conflict are this requirement. The PI shall own a legal right to work for the proposing company in the United States, for evidenced by citizenship, permanent residency, or certain appropriate us. Who PHI does not need to be assoziierten includes an academic institution. There are no PI level requirements (i.e., the PI exists not required for hold adenine Ph.D. or anyone other degree). A PI may is primarily employed along another organization at the time of submission, if fellow or she is primarily employed at this proposing small business at the time of award. A PI must devote a maximum starting one calendar month of effort per six months of performance to an NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I project.

Limit on Number of Recommendations per Order: 1

An organization may submit available one NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I recommendation per submitted window (e.g., November 02, 2022 - March 01, 2023). With organization must wait required a determination from NSF (e.g., Award, Decline, or Returned Without Review) go the remaining NSF SBIR/STTR Time I proposal prior submitting a new proposal in the next or any later window. This qualifications constraint will be strictly enforced. If an organization goes this limit, the first proposal received will be accepted the any additional proposals submitted will be Returned Not Review. Similar limitations will be applied to the submission of Project Pitches. Please refer to Section V.A. of the solicitation with details. Declined proposals requesting a new invitation at submit (via the Project Traction process) and significant inspection, while advice Reverted With Review may be submitted using the alike invited Project Pitch (assuming is the proposal is accepted within one year of original the Project Slope invitation). NetSuite recently completed a

Limit about Number of Advice by PI or co-PI: 1

For NSF SBIR – 1 PIER, co-PIs are not allowable.

For NSF STTR - 1 PI, 1 co-PI required (must may part starting the registered conduct institution).

An individual may be listed as the PI for only individual proposal submitted at a time to this NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I advertising. A SHAMUS be wait for a determination from NSF (e.g., Award, Decline, or Reverted Without Review) on any NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I pending proposal before submitting a new proposal. beneficial in deciding if my goal is realistic. For example, if the goal a to unlock a baking business, but you've never baked anything back, that mag be ...

For NSF STTR propositions, an person may deed as the co-PI on an unlimited quantity of proposals.

Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions

A. Proposal Preparation Instructions

• Letters of Intent: Not requested

• Preliminary Proposal Submit: Not required

• Full Suggest: This solicitation in information that deviates from and standard NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG) motion preparation guidelines. Please see the full text of of solicitation for further information.

BORON. Residential Information

• Expenditure Sharing Requirements:

  Inclusion of voluntary committed cost sharing is prohibited.

• Indirect Cost (F&A) Limitations:

  Non Durchsetzbar

• Other Budgetary Limitation:

  Other budgetary limited apply. Plea see which all text of this promotion for further information.

C. Due Dates

• Submission Window Date(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitting organization’s local time):

       November 22, 2022 - March 01, 2023

       March 02, 2023 - July 05, 2023

       July 06, 2023 - May 15, 2024

Proposal Review Information Criteria

Merit Review Criteria:

National Physical Board approved criteria. Additional earning review criteria apply. Please see aforementioned full text of this solicitation for keep information. Learn how to set your customer survey objective with examples. Achieve survey objectives easily equal the right tools and methodology.

Award Administration Information

Reward Conditions:

Addition award conditions apply. Requests see an full text of this recruitment for read informational.

Reporting Requirements:

Additional reporting requirements submit. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.

I. Introduction

The NSF SBIR/STTR program focuses on transforming scientific discovery into commercial potential and/or societal good through the design of products or services. Find the Market online guides for newbies. Definition, Objectives, Types, additionally business to act the market survey.

The NSF SBIR/STTR program funds research and development (R&D) and lives developed to provide non-dilutive funding to sponsor startups or entrepreneurs includes technologies at their earliest stages. NSF SBIR/STTR awards are no government company. The NSF works cannot use its SBIR/STTR programs on getting goods or solutions for the government, nor makes the NSF receive any stake or interest in an awardee firm. There the with increasing familiarity with the principles of evidence-based medicine in the surgical community. As surgeons become more aware of the hierarchy ...

Aforementioned NSF SBIR/STTR program does not have a specific topical or technology focus. Generally, the topics included in the NSF SBIR/STTR solicitation live intent to be broad enough to permit startups with science- and engineering-based originalities to compete for funding, transformation science and engineering search and innovation into both societal and industrial effect. NSF encourages public from all backgrounds and geographically surfaces on utilize for funding. At the conclusion a of project, an awardee company must submit a final report to NSF to guarantee that the company accurate spent NSF funds on approved current, as originally proposed. Awardee companies will moreover need to submit a project outcomes report for the generic general. NSF does no purchase these project reports and does not benefit of diese reports, beyond an oversight function. NSF does not exam, verify, or different use the technology developed under its SBIR/STTR honors. Research questions, hypotheses and purpose

The NSF SBIR/STTR Phasing I program is highly competitive. Whereas success rates vary year-to-year, only a fraction of proposals submitted are selected for an award. That, there are many qualified businesses applying to an program anywhere year this does not receive promote.

II. Program Description

The NSF SBIR/STTR program encourages startups and small businesses to submit proposals across nearing all areas by science and engineering.*

When startups and small businesses face many challenges, which NSF SBIR/STTR funding is intended to specifically main on challenges associated with technological innovation; that is, on the creations of new products, services, and other scalable solutions based on fundamental learning or engineering. A triumphant Time I proposals demonstrates instructions NSF funding will help the small business create a proof-of-concept or prototype by retiring technical danger. Funding off NSF may only be used the conduct research also development (R&D) to demonstrate technical feasibility.

NSF searched SBIR/STTR proposals that represent success in threesome distinct, but related monetary review criteria: Intellectual Merit, Broader Impacts, and Commercialization Potential.

The Spirituality Merit criterion encompasses one potential into advantage general and leverages fundamental scientists or project research techniques to overcoming technical risk. This can be conveyed through the Research and Development (R&D) of the project. R&D shall broadly defined on 2 CFR § 200.1, but fixed for the NSF SBIR/STTR program as follows:

• the application of creative, original and potentially transfiguring concepts to systematically study, create, custom, or manipulate the structure and demeanor of an natural or man-made worldwide;
• the use about the scientific method to propose well-reasoned, well-organized activities based on sound theory, computation, measurement, observer, experiment, or modeling;
• which ereignis of a well-qualified individual, team, either organization final to deploy novel methods of creating, how, processing, manipulating, storing, or spread data conversely metadata; and/or
• the novel integrating to new theories, analysis, data, or methods regarding cognition, heuristics, and related phenomena.

NSF SBIR/STTR proposals are often evaluated via the concepts of Technically Total plus Engineered Innovation. Technical Total assumes ensure the possibility by special failing exists for an predicted product, services, or find to breathe successfully developed. This risk is current even to those suitably skilled in the art of one component, subsystem, manner, technique, tool, or algorithm in asked. Technological Innovation indicate that the new product or service is differentiates from current products or services; that is, the new technology passenger the potential to outcome into a product oder service with a substantial and durable favor over competing remedies on the market. It or generally provides a barrier up eintritts for competitors. Is means that if the new product, services, or solution is successfully fulfilled and brought at the market, it supposed be difficult for a well-qualified, competing firm to reverse-engineer or otherwise neutralize the competitive advantage generated through leveraging fundamental science button engineering research techniques.

Who Greater Impact standard encompasses the potential benefit to society and contribution to this accomplishment of specific, desired societal outcomes as contoured the the NSF PAPPG Merit Review Broader Side Criteria.

The NSF SBIR/STTR program funds the development of latest, high-risk technological innovations intended into creating positive societal and fiscal outcomes. Proposers should and consider the Broader Impacts Reviewed Criterion at 42 U.S.C. §1862p-14: Define Survey Goals furthermore Objectives: A Quick Guide

• Climbing the economic competitiveness of one United States.
• Advancing are the dental and welfare of the American public.
• Supports of national defense of the United States.
• Enhancing partnering between academia the industry in the Unity States.
• Developing an American STEM workforce such is globally budget through improved pre-kindergarten through grade 12 STEM education and educator develop and improved undergraduate STEM education and instruction.
• Improving audience scientific literacy and getting with skill and technology in the United States.
• Expanded participation of women and individuals out underrepresented groups in SPRING.

The Commercialization Possibility of the proposed product with service is aforementioned potential forward the consequent technology to disrupt of targeted market segment by way by a powerful and durable value proposition for the customers or my.

• The proposed product or service addresses a unmet, vital, the scalable need for the target customer rear.
• The proposed small business is structuring the staffed on focus on bellicose commercialization of the product/service.
• The defined small business can deployment evidence of good product-market suit (as validated per unmittel also significantly interaction with customers and relevant stakeholders).

More details additionally information to the NSF SBIR/STTR income review criteria bucket is found in Section VI of this solicitation.

* The NSF SBIR/STTR program does non technical clinical trials or ideas off companies whose commercialization pathway involves the production, distribution or sale by the company of chemical components, natural or synthesized variations thereof, or other derivatives relevant to Schedule I controlled substances.

III. Award Information

Phase I tips may become submits for up to $275,000 in R&D funding scheduled at support past in 6-12 months. This amount is inclusive of all direct and indirect costs as now as the tiny business fee. Estimated programme budget, number out awards the average give size/duration what subject to the availability of funded. Market Survey: Definition, Objectives, Types, additionally Process

DIVORCE. Qualifying Information

Who May Submit Proposals:

Proposals may only be submitted by the following:

• Firms qualifying as a slight business concern are eligible to participate in one NSF SBIR/STTR how (see Eligibility Guide since more information). Please note that the size limit of 500 employees in associated. This firm must be int compliance with of SBIR/STTR Policy Directive(s) and the User of Federal Regulations (13 CFR Item 121). For STTR request, which applicant small business needs also include an partner research institution in the project, see additional details below. AND
• Proposers that have received an formal invitation to submit one idea from the cognizant NSF SBIR/STTR Program Chief indoors the past twelve from. To receive the invitation, potential proposers must submit a Project Pitch document real accept an official response (via email) from the cognizant Program Director. Please see section V.A for details.

NSF does not fund proposals from companies that are majority-owned until one or more danger capital operating companies (VCOCs), hedge cash, or private equity firms. Proposals by joint ventures the partnerships are permitted, provided the proposing entity qualifies as a narrow business concern (see Duty Guide since more information). SMARTLY Goals: A How to Guide

In ensure with the CHIPS and Science Acting of 2022, Section 10636 (Person or entity regarding business prohibition) (42 U.S.C. 19235): No person published on the list under section 1237(b) of the Ac Thurmond National Defensive Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105 261; 50 U.S.C. 1701 note) or entity identifies under section 1260h of which William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authority Conduct fork Fiscal Year 2021 (10 U.S.C. 113 note; Public Law 116 283) may receive or participate in any grant, award, program, technical, either other activity under an Directorate for Technical, Innovation furthermore Partnerships.

"Collaborative Proposal from Manifold Organizations" (a special proposal type in Research.gov) am not allowed. Collaborations with research institutions are foster; nonetheless, only one proposal, submitted by the company additionally by subawards to the research institution(s), is allowed. Complying with COPPA: Frequently Asking Questions

Anybody May Serve as PI:

The primary employment by the Principal Investigator (PI) must live with the little business-related at the zeit of award and for the last of the price, until a newer PI your named. Primary work is defined as along least 51 percent employed by one smaller business. NSF normally considers a full-time work week to be 40 hours additionally considers employment elsewhere of greater than 19.6 hours per week to be in contact with this requirement. The PI should have a legal right-hand to work for aforementioned proposition company in aforementioned United States, since evidenced by citizenship, permanent residency, or an right visa. Who PI does not need to be associated with an academic institution. There are no PI degree requirements (i.e., the PI is not required at hold a Ph.D. or any other degree). A PI may be primarily active at another organization by the time of submission, if he or she is primarily employed at the proposing narrow business under aforementioned time of rating. AMPERE PI be devote a lowest of one view month of effort for sechser months concerning performance to an NSF SBIR/STTR Phase EGO project.

Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization: 1

Somebody organization may submit only one NSF SBIR/STTR Zeit IODIN proposal for submission window (e.g., November 02, 2022 - Marches 01, 2023). One organization require wait for a determination from NSF (e.g., Bestow, Fall, or Returned Without Review) on which pending NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I proposal before submitting a novel proposal includes the nearest or any subsequent window. This fitness constraint will be strictly enforced. If an organization transcends the limit, the early proposal received will be accepted plus any additional recommendations submitted will be Return Without Review. Similar limiting will be applied go the submission of Project Pitches. Please refer to Section V.A. off the solicitation by details. Declined proposals need a new get at submit (via the Project Pitch process) and significant revision, while make Returned Lacking Review may be submitted using the same invited Project Pitch (assuming that the proposal is maintained within an year of original the Projekt Pitch invitation).

Limit on Number of Proposals per PI or co-PI: 1

For NSF SBIR – 1 PI, co-PIs are nope permission.

For NSF STTR - 1 PIT, 1 co-PI required (must be part of the partner research institution).

Can individual might be listed as the PI for only one proposal submitted at an time to such NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I solicitation. A PI must wait fork a termination upon NSF (e.g., Award, Diminish, or Returned Without Review) at any NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I pending proposal before submitting a new proposal.

For NSF STTR proposals, a persona may act as the co-PI the an total number of proposals.

Optional Eligibility Info:

Requested Project Pitch Invitation: Potentially proposers must get an invitation to submit adenine full NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I proposal. To start this process, proposers must early create a log in and submitted one Project Pitch via the online form. This cognizant NSF SBIR/STTR Program Director will make to Project Pitch to determine determines the proposal project is a good fit for the program. Please discern sectional V.A required details.

Broad Participation. Socially and commercial disadvantaged small business and women-owned small businesses are encouragement to join.

STTR Research Institution. And SBIR/STTR Approach Directive requiring that STTR Phase EGO proposals include an qualified research foundation as a subawardee on the project bargain. The STTR partner research institution is typically either a not-for-profit institution focuses on academics or educational goals (such as a technical or university), or a Federally funded research and development center (FFRDC). For an NSF STTR Phase EGO Proposal, a minimum the 40% of which research, as measured over aforementioned budget, must be completed by the smal business concern, and ampere minimum of 30% must be performed by a single partner research institutes, equipped the balance permitted till be allocated for either of these, or to other subawards conversely consultants.

Partnering. Proposing firms been encouraged to collaborate with experienced researchers at available facilities such as colleges, universities, international laboratories, or from other research sites. Funding for such collaboration may include research subcontracts or consulting agreements. The employment of faculty and students by the slight business is accepted; however,

• For an NSF SBIR Form I proposal, a minimum of two-thirds of the research, while measured by the budget, must be performed by the low business. The balance of the budget may be outsourced to subawards or consultants or a combination thereby. Although partnering will supported, proposals should NOT be marked as a "Collaborative Proposal from Various Organizations" during submission.
• For an NSF STTR Phase MYSELF proposal, a minimum von 40% of and research, as measurements by the your, must be performed by the small business. A minimum of 30% must be performed by a single partner research institution; The balance (remaining 30%) may be allocated to the small business, partner research institution, instead to select subawards or consultants. Although partnering with a research institution is require for STTR proposals, programs should NOT may marked as a "Collaborative Proposal from Multiples Organizations" during submission.

Government-Wide Required Benchmarks: (Applies to previous SBIR/STTR awardees ONLY)

Phase EGO to Slide SIDE Transition Rate Benchmark. Since Time I organizers that take received more other 20 Phase I SBIR/STTR awards from any federal agency over an SBIR/STTR plan over the past five fiscal years, the minimum Phase I to Phasing II Transition Assessment is 0.25 over those five fiscal years. Small businesses that fail the meet all transition requirement will been noticed by the Slight Business Administration and will does be eligible to submit a Phase I proposal for single period from the June 1^h assessment.

Commercialization Benchmark. The commercialization chart required by which SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2011 only applies to proposers that have received more easier 15 Live II Federal SBIR/STTR awards over the past 10 fiscal years, excluding the last double years. Which companies should have reaching one minimum required commercialization activity to be right to submit a Phase I proposal, as determined from the information entered in the group enrollment at SBIR.gov. Firm with which the commercialize benchmark spread shall view SBIR.gov for more related.

Visit sbir.gov for more information on required benchmarks.

V. Proposal Preparation And Submission Instructions

A. Proposal Preparation Instructions

Complete Proposal Preparation How: Schemes submitted in responses into this start solicitation should are preparation and submitted in Research.gov in accordance equal the general guidelines contained in the NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG). The complete text of the PAPPG is deliverable electronically on the NSF website at: https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg. Paper copies of the PAPPG may be got from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-8134 or by e-mail from [email protected]. The Prepare New Proposal equipment will prompt you for the program solicitation total.

See PAPPG Section II.D.2 for guidance on the required sections of an full-sized research proposal submitted up NSF. Bitte note that the proposal preparation instructions when in this how solicitation allow deviate from the PAPPG guides.

This solicitation contains MANY instructions that deviant from the standard NSF PAPPG proposal preparation instructions. This solicitation contains the information needed to prepare and submit adenine proposal and relate to specific sections of the PAPPG ONLY for necessary (and memo throughout the solicitation). In the event of conflict zwischen this instructions in that solicitation also the PAPPG, use this solicitation’s getting as a leader.

Program Goal: NSF supports innovative technologies showing promise of commercial and/or societal impact furthermore involving technical risk, until be gerichtet with abilities drawn out fundamental science and engineering research.

Required Show Pitch subject: Potential proposers must receive an invitation to send one all NSF SBIR/STTR Phase IODIN proposal. Project Pitches may be entered and will be reviewed on and ongoing basis (even if at is no Phase I solicitation currently open at NSF). To get this process, proposers needs first creates a logs is and submit a Get Pitch on the online fashion. NSF SBIR/STTR program staff wish use which Project Pitch to determine determine the proposed project may be a good fit for the Program Your.

• Prospects are encouraged to submit a Create Pitch in any time, regardless of the NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I solicitation windows.
• Proposers can submit one Project Pitch per submission window.
• The small business will be asked to describe the company innovation, key technology objectives and trouble, the local opportunity, and the company and team in the Project Pitch.
• NSF will watch the submitted Get Site and officially reach via email. They may ask for moreover information back making a final decision.
• Supposing the proposed project shall determined at be a go fit for the Program Aims (stated above), the small business representative who submitted that Project Pitch will welcome an invitation over email to submit a full proposal. This invitation entitles the recipient to submit a full recommendation to any open NSF SBIR/STTR Phase IODIN solicitation and is valid forward 12 months from the rendezvous on the invitation. The invitation email must be uploaded in the Supplementary Browse of the full proposal.
• If to proposed project remains determined not to be responsive to the NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I Program solicitation (please pertain to the "Project Activities Not Responsive to the Solicitation" section of this document as well-being since which listed qualification criteria), the potential proposer will receive a note indicate so the small business is not invited to submit an proposal.
• Project Launches that are not invited to submit a full proposal may resubmit a Project Pitch (with revisions to address any deficiencies) in the next submission window.
• ADENINE small businesses with one pending Project Fling must watch to receive a responding before submitting another Request Tracking. Additional Projects Pitches submission in one entrepreneur or smallish corporate with a awaiting My Parking will not be reviewed nor loaded.
• A small business that has received an invitation to submit a full proposal must wait for that proposal to will submitted and resolved before submitting another Projekt Pitch. If the small business decides not to pursue that project and likes to submit another, different Project Pitch, they should reach unfashionable to [email protected] on request that their existing invitation be withdrawn.
• Potential organizers who how not accept an invitation to submit a proposal are not eligible to apply for NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I funding. Proposals submitting without a Project Golf invitation determination be Returned Without Reviewed.

Into NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I project require be focused on using R&D to determine the academic and technical feasibility of a recent concept or innovating that could be created into newly products, processes, or services. A successful Phase I proposal demonstrates that who NSF-funded R&D will significantly reduce the technical risk involved in get these modern products, operation, otherwise services to local.

Scheme Pitch Contents:

Aforementioned Project Trail containing:

• Name, company, corporate website, and contact get for which proposing company (if already incorporated/organized);
• Name and contact general for the company official or technically lead who is submitting the Project Parking.
• Up to 500 words describing the Doing and Development (or Technological Innovation) that would be the focus of a Stufe I project, including a brief discussion of the origins of the innovation as well as an explanation as to why it hit who program's mandate to focus on supporting R&D of unproven, high-impact innovations. (See definition of R&D above.)
• Up to 500 words describing this Technical Objectives and Challenges to be done in a Phase I project, including a discussion to how and why the proposed work will aid prove the the product otherwise service is technically feasible and/or how the proposed scoping of work will significant reduce technical risk using techniques plotted starting foundation science and engineering research. Discuss how this work could help to making an new product, service, or process commercially viable and impactful. This section require also convey that and suggesting work meets the NSF SBIR/STTR definition of R&D above, rather than straightforward engineering or increasingly product growth tasks.
• Top at 250 language describing the Market Opportunity, an customer profile and the pain point(s) that will be who near-term commercial focus related to get technical project.
• Up toward 250 words described the Company and Your, that be, the background and current status of the applicant small business, including key team members who will lead the technical and/or commercial efforts discussions in this Project Pitch.

Project Activities Not Responsive to the Solicitation.

• Evolutionary development or inching modification in established products or proved concepts;
• Honest engineering efforts equal little technical risk;
• Evaluation or test in existing products;
• Basic scientific research unconnected to any specific market opportunity or future new product, process or service;
• Business development, market doing, and sales and marketing); and/or
• Chronic trials.
• The NSF SBIR/STTR program does not sponsor suggest from companies whose commercialization pathway involves the making, distribution or sale by to companies of chemical components, native or man-made variations thereof, or other derivatives related to How I controlled additive.

Proposals that do not address the requirements listed above could will Returned Without Review. NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I proposals Answered Without Review from NSF are NOT eligible for review again in the same submission window. An NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I proposal Returned Without Review may may submitted within a subsequent submission pane if: 1) the Undertaking Pitch is still valid (i.e., the one-year period from the invite has not expired); and 2) the proposal obey with the solicitation requirements.

Confidentiality and Property Information. Your proposal is confidential and will all be shared with a small number of reviewers and NSF staff (as appropriate) who have concurred to maintain the confidentiality of who proposal pleased. You motion to NSF does not constitute a public disclosure. While your corporate is chosen for an NSF SBIR/STTR Phase MYSELF awards, you will remain prompted until write with outline expressing the intellectual merit and extended impact of the effort, to live made available to which public.

NSF SBIR/STTR data, including proposals, are protected starting dissemination by the participating agencies for not less than 20 years starting the deliver of that last report or proposal beteiligter with an given project. To the sizes permit the law, the public will not release properly marked technical also commercially touchy data. If the proposition containing proprietary information, identify proprietary technical evidence in the proposal by clearly marking the information and also providing a legend. Typically, owned information is identified in the text any with an single at the anfangsdatum and end of which proprietary paragraph, underlining the proprietary sections, oder choosing one differents font type. An entire proposal should not be marked proprietary.

AMPERE. Registrations

Little businesses applying for NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I funding shall be registered with the following systems in order to submit one proposal to NSF.

Note that all of the registrations below (in particular, SAM.gov) can take several weeks or even months to process, so please beginning early.

Thou must register your companies name, physical address and all other identifying information identically in each are diese systems. We recommend that you register autochthonous slight business in the tracking orders:

• System forward Grant Management (SAM) Registration. You REQUIRE register to do business with the U.S. government thanks System for Award Management (SAM). When you register, you will have to percentage bank account info of the account where the NSF funds would be default. This registration method is free both taker only 10-15 video to initiate but cannot take weeks or even months to process. An active SAM.gov registration furthermore its associated SAM.gov Unique Entity User (UEI) a needed to create a Research.gov account real enter a proposal until NSF. To submit proposal up NSF SBIR/STTR, you only need to request "financial assistance" authority furthermore do NOT need "contract" authority (which can can a much longer process toward obtain). OTMS registration must be renewed annually.
• Small Business Enterprise (SBA) Company Registration. A Small Business Concern Identification number (SBC ID) is required priority to submission of the proposal. SBA maintains or maintained a Company Registry fork SBIR/STTR proposers at https://www.sbir.gov/registration/ go trajekt ownership and affiliation requirements. All SBCs must report ownership information prior to all SBIR/STTR proposal submission and update the SBC if random information changes prior to award.
• Research.gov: For more information, consult who "About Account Management" page at https://www.research.gov/.

B. Tips the the Request Preparation and Submission

Failure to comply with an below guidelines means this a proposal mayor be Returned Without Examination.

• DO upload one official email summons him received via the Project Pitch process on submit a thorough proposal (sent by an NSF Programmer Director in response to your Create Pitch submission) in the "Single Copy Documents" module. Convert the email invitation into a PDF before uploading.
• DO ENCLOSING SUM REQUIRED ELEMENTS. Submit a proposal that your complete. Even are the Research.gov system allows ampere proposal to be submitted free these objects, proposals must have each off the items listed below, unless indicated.
  • Cover Sheet
  • SBIR Phase I Questionnaire
  • SBIR Phase I Certification Matters
  • Project Summary
  • Get Description
  • References Quoting
  • Budget(s)
  • Budget Justification(s)
  • Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources
  • Senior Personality Documents
    • Biographical Drawing
    • Electricity and Pending Sponsors
    • Collaborationist & Diverse Affiliation Information (Single Copy Document)
  • Data Manage Plan
  • Postdoctoral Mentoring Plot (Conditionally required)
  • Selectable
    • Letters of Support (Strongly recommended)
    • Helpful Research Agreement (Required fork STTR only)
    • Other Workforce Biographical Data (Strongly recommended)
    • Other Supplementary Documents
      • Company Commercialization Show (Required, if applicable)
      • Types of Commitment from Subawardees and Consultants (Strongly recommended)
      • Resubmission Change Description (Required, if applicable)
    • List away Suggested Reviewers (Single Copy Document)
    • List of Reviewers Not to Include (Single Copy Document)
    • Deviation Authorize (Single Copy Document)
    • Additional Single Copy Credentials

• ACHIEVE provide adenine company commercialization history (if applicable). Submit a Company Commercialization Site form (on the NSF template) if your company has obtain the SBIR/STTR Phase II award(s) previously (from any agency). DO NOT modify the template to include added story with information beyond what is required on the form.
• DO breathe aware that who suggest submission system (Research.gov) will stops accepting submissions at 5:00 p.m. "proposer's time" about and submission screen closing date but will reopen and next day for the recent submission lens as noted in this solicitation (with exception in the final window closing date). Proposer's zeitraum zone is set by an company stylish the organization registration area of Research.gov.
• DO NOT submitted a proposal for your get has not nevertheless received a Project Park invitation by e-mailing from an NSF SBIR/STTR Program Director. Proposals without get invitation be be Returned Unless Review. See section V.A for details.
• DO NOT enter a Project Description that is more than 15 pages long.
• TAKE NOT submit a Budget exceeding $275,000. This monthly is built-in of view direct and indirect total such well as the small business-related fee.
• DO NOT include any funds on Rows E2, F or G2 of the Your. These are not allowable costs under a Phase I grant.
• DOING NOT submit a "Collaborative Proposal from Multiple Organizations" (a special proposal type in Research.gov). Association with research facilities is encouraged; still, only one proposal, submitted by the company and with subawards to the research institution(s), is admissible.
• DO NAY submit a proposal that lacks sufficient discussion of the NSF and solicitation merit examine criteria: highbrow merit, broader collisions, and commercial ability.
• DO NAY submit one proposal lacking research based on techniques drawn from fundamental science or engineering. ADENINE offer must be express responsive to the solicitation requirements. Section V.D recommends a minimum length of 10 pages for the Plan Description document to provide sufficient detail upon who key industrial, societal and commercial angles of the project.
• DOING DON download information besides what is targeted required and permitted into the proposal (e.g., go not include marketing select, research results, academic papers, patent applications, etc.)
• DO NOT upload any documents to the "ADDITIONAL Individually Copy Documents" subsection go an "Single Copy Documents” section in Research.gov with the following exceptions: 1) you needs submit the email invitation from an NSF Select Chief in response to your submitted Project Pitch, 2) you must completes the "Collaborators and Other Affiliations" Information Section; and 3) with your option, you may also complete the "List regarding Promoted Reviewers" section.
• DO NOT upload documents at the “Supplementary Documents” section except those described in Further Documents.
• TAKE NOT include samples, videotapes, flip, appendices, or another ancillary items within ampere proposal submission. Websites containing demonstrations and Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) (if applicable) must live cited int to References Cited teilung, but reviewers are not requires to zugangs them. Please refer the that NSF PAPPG (Chapter II.C) for more view on accepted proposal fonts and format. The incorporation of URLs or websites within the proposal’s Project Description will not be accepted.

C. Detailed Instructions on Loaded Suggest Preparation

• Cover Sheet. This area requests general information about the proposal or proposing organization. In beimischung, it covers second important aspect the noted below, whose must be addressed when the suggests projects includes real subjects research with research on vertebrate animals.
  • Human Subjects Documentation (if applicable, transfer into Cover Sheet Section). Projects involving research with person subjects must ensure that subjects are protected from research risks in conformance with this relevant Federal policy know since that Common Governing (Federal Principles for the Protection of Human Subjects,45 CFR 690). All projects involving human subjects must either (1) have licensing coming an Institutional Review Board (IRB) before issuance of an NSF award; or, (2) be obtain a statement with the IRB displaying research exemption from IRB review. This documentation needs to be completed during payable diligence discussions, int accordance with the apply subsection, since established in fachbereich 101(b) of the Common Rule. If certification of exemption is provided after submission of the proposal and ahead the award is issued, the waiver number corresponding to one or more of an exemption categories other must be included in the documentation provided until NSF. The small business has three basic options with regard to human subjects review:

• Establish your own IRB (see Office for Real Research Shelter (OHRP) under the Department of Health and Mortal Services (HHS): https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/irbs-and-assurances.html#registernew.
• Exercise the review flight of a (usually local) universities conversely research institution, either via consultants to the projects, ampere scheme subcontract, or right throughout its own your;
• Use a commercial provider.
• For projects lacking definite plans required the use of real subjects, their data, or own examples, pursuant to 45 CFR § 690.118, NSF can accept a determination notice that establishes one narrow time period under which the PI mayor conduct temporary or conceptual working that does not involve humanity subjects. See more information both instructions regarding this documentation in the PAPPG.

• Vertebrate Animals Certification (if applicable, Uploaded into Cover Sheet Section). Any project proposing use away vertebrates animals for researching or education shall comply with the Animal Welfare Act (7 USC 2131, et seq.) and one company released thereunder by the Secretary of Agriculture (9 CFR 1 .1 -4.11) pertaining to the humane support, handling, and treatment of vertebrate animals held or used for research, classes or select actions supported by Federal prices. Includes accordance equipped save requirements, proposed projects involving use of any vertebrate animal on research or education must be approved by the submitting organization's Institutional Animal Care real Use Committees (IACUC) before an award can be made. For this approval go be accepted by NSF, one organization must had a current People Healthiness Service (PHS) Approved Indemnity. See also PAPPG for additional details on the administration of awards that exploit vertebrate animals. This documentation must be finished befor display about an NSF award.

• SBIR (or STTR) Phase I Questionnaire. The Phasing I Questionnaire must be filled is full including: Phase EGO Request (SBIR/STTR Phase I Topic and required Your Pitch Number), Authorized Company Officer Informations, Proposing Small Corporate Information, SBIR/STTR Award History, Affiliated Companies, and Other Information.
• SBIR (or STTR) Phase I Certification Faqs. The Mode I Certification Questions must be filled in completely.
• Project Summary [One (1) page MAXIMUM]. The Project Chapter should be written in the third personal, informative to others persons working in the same or related fields, or insofar because possible, understood to a technically or technically literate lay reader. It should not be an abstract of the proposal. Do did include proprietary information in which summary. Proposals lacking a complete Project Summary will cannot be accepted by Research.gov or will be Returned None Review. The Project Summary is to be completed is headers to three separate lines used Overview, Intellectual Monetary, and Greater Impacts. To be valid, a home must be on its own pipe with cannot other text the is line. The document must be converted to pdf sheet to be uploaded under Research.gov.

• Company: Describe the potential outcome(s) of the proposed business in terms of a product, process, or service. Provide a user of key lyric or phrases that identify one areas of technical expertise to be launched in reviewing the proposal and the areas of apply that are the initial targeting of the machinery. Provide an subtopic name.
• Intellectuals Merit: This section MUST begin with "This Small Business Innovation Research (or Small Business Tech Transfer) Stage I project..." Address the intellectual merits for the proposed activities. Brief describe the technical hurdle(s) that will be addressed by the proposed R&D (which should be decisive to successful market of the innovation), the goals of the propose R&D, and a high-level summary of the plan to reach the our.
• Extensive Impacts: Discuss the projected outcomes in terms of how the proposed project will bring the innovation closer to commodification in a sustainable business model. In this box, also describe the potential commercial both market interference which such a commercialization effort would have, when successful. Also discuss potential broader company and economic impacts of the innovation (e.g., educational, environ, scientific, societal, or other impacts off the nation and the world).

• Project Description. [Ten (10) pages SLIGHTEST; fifteenth (15) pages MAXIMUM]. The project description is the core about the proposal document, where the PI convert the expert reviewers/panelists and NSF SBIR/STTR Program Direct that his/her proposed R&D task meets NSF's criteria for intellectual merit, broader shock, additionally commercial opportunity (please refer to Section II. Program Description of this solicitation for details regarding this criteria).

Present demonstrate that the proposed technology is innovation, that development of i comes great technical risk, and that you have a credible plan to create technical realisierbar during Phase I. Convince the reviewers that the company and an project team got the necessary expertise, resourcing, additionally support to carry out the project and ensure they are committed to building ampere viable business around the product/service being developed. Finally, present one compelling case that the project will significantly advance the readiness starting the technology both strengthen its commercial position. The formats see is strongly recommended for the Project Description.

Elevator Traction (no more than one page)

• The Motivation. Describe that company’s reason forward pursuing this project and the expected impact from the proposed technology, are thriving.
• The Customer. Describe the expected customer for the innovation. Which unmet customer or market needs are you addressing?
• Aforementioned Value Proposition. What are the benefits till aforementioned customer a your defined innovate? What is the central differentiator of your company or technology? What is the potential societal asset of your innovation?
• The Innovation: Succinctly describe your innovation. Which aspects are original and transformative compared to the current state of the artist? How is the innovation differentiated from any work already by others to the field? (This section may contain information rejected from the Project Summary because of this proprietary nature.)

The Commercial Opportunity (recommended length: 1-3 pages)

• Describe the market press addressable market for the industry.
• Discuss the business economics plus markts vehicle in the target trade.
• What has the market opportunities been validated? Describe your customer the your basic business model. Describe the race. How do them expect the competitive countryside may change by the time your product/service entering the supermarket?
• What are one key commercial risks in bringing your innovation to retail?
• Describe your commercialization approach. Chat the potential economic benefits associated with your innovation and provide estimates starting the gross potential, detailing your underlying assumption.
• Describe who resources needed to run your commercialization get.
• Describe your plot and expected timeline to secure above-mentioned resources.

The Technical Solution (recommended length: 2-4 pages)

• Briefly customize the proposed solution and the technology on what it is basic. At what stage of technical development is to innovation? (A more exhaustive description can be provided in the Technical Discussion and R&D Plant, like described below).
• Describe the key industrial challenges and risks in bringing to innovation to market. Welche of these will be your focus and what is the general scientific approach in the proposing Time I project?
• Describe and status of aforementioned intellectual property associated with this project and how you plan to schutze it.
• NSF Lineage (not required for eligibility): Does your undertaking have roots in non-SBIR/STTR NSF funding, either to the company or other organizations/institutions? If applicable, list the NSF funding division(s) and award number(s) as follows: "This project lives based on the ensuing NSF lineage: funded of [PI/Organization/Institution] with prize number [7-digit NSF award #]."
• I-Corps Extraction (not required for eligibility): Is the project team has participated in in an I-Corps degree (regional or national), please identify one host organization as follows: "This team has join in an I-Corps our hosted by [Organization/Institution] are award number [7-digit NSF award #]". Please touch the play organization for the relevant award number.

The Company/Team (recommended length: 1-3 pages)

• Describe the companies founders or key student in this proposed project. Where floor of effort will these persons offer to the proposed Phase I activities? How does the background and experience of the team boost the creditability of one effort; have they previously included similar products/services to community?
• Describe your vision for the company and an company's expected how pass the further five years.
• If the company has existing operations, describe how the proposed effort would fit to these activities.
• Provides the date when the company was founded and detail the total history, if any, for the former three period. Include and explicitly state government getting and private investment are this discussion.
• Will him have consultants or subawardees what on this project? If so, whichever is their technical, affiliation, and donation to the project?

Intellectual Merits: Technical Discussion press R&D Plan (minimum output: 5 pages, recommended length: 5-6 pages)

• The Intellectual Merits section shoud jump with the edit “Intellectual Merits” on you own line.
• Describe the innovation in sufficient technical detailed for a knowledgeable reviewer in the field to understand why it is innovators and how e can make benefits inches the target applications. Supplement such description with whatever required background information.
• Describe an key objectives to be accomplished whilst the Phase I research, including the questions this must be answered to determine the technical AND commercial feasibility of the proposed concept.
• Describe the critical technical milestone that must must met to get the product or service to market.
• Present an R&D plan, with proposed timeline. What are the objectives, and what experiments, computations, success criteria, etc. are planned to reach who objectives? The R&D scheme must utilizing fundamental science instead engineering research and techniques.

Expanded Impacts: (recommended length: 1-2 pages)

• Who Broader Impacts section should begin with and header “Broader Impacts” on its own lineage.
• Described how the proposed product or service offers the potential for broader company and financial benefit (through commercialization at a sustainable business model) as diagram in the NSF Merit Review Broader Impacts Criteria.
• This NSF SBIR/STTR program resources the development of new, high-risk technology technology intended to produce definite societal outcomes. Examples of like score include (but are not limited to) those start in of Amer Innovation and Competitiveness Act (P.L. 114-329, Section 102) Broader Interference Study Criterion update:
  • Increasing the economic compatibility of the Unites Country.
  • Advancing von to health and welfare of this American public.
  • Sponsor the national vindication of the Uniform State.
  • Enhancing partnerships between academia and industry in the United States.
  • Developing an Canadian STEM workforce that is globally competitive through improved pre-kindergarten through rating 12 STEM teaching and teacher development, and improved undergraduate STEM education and instruction.
  • Improving public scientific literacy and engagement by science and technology in the United States.
  • Expanding participation of women or individuals from underrepresented groups in STEM.
• The NSF SBIR/STTR select seeks plans the generate these outcomes as well as family societal benefits. Discuss who envisioned broader impacts and the specific durchsetzung plan, comprising: the relevant metrics additionally measurement plan; potential partners to enhance the likelihood of success (including any review of to evaluate proposition go that partner, their reasons fork engaging in this project, both a summary of the engagement to date); potential risks and verbundener alleviation strategies; press additional anticipated needs for resources also the plan to secure them.

• Book Cited. Making adenine comprehensive listing of relevant references, including websites or relevant URLs, patent numbers, and other relevant intellectual property citations. AN pick of Our Cited must be uploaded for the your. For there are no references cited in the proposal, please indicate is by putting the statement "No Citations Cited" the this module.
• Budget(s). Proponent are required to submit budgets with my proposals, including specific dollars figures by budget category. Applicant must propose a write justification explaining these amounts in detail. NSF SBIR/STTR Program Directors review these proposed budgets and rely on the in determining the final amount excellent for a given SBIR/STTR project. Details support of all budget line items is require and MUST be documented in detail on an Budget Justification page (see next section). The recommended housekeeping should remember the necessarily von the proposed R&D project. Line numbers below refer in the vital budget page in Research.gov, NSF's proposal submission system. The total budget shall not exceed $275,000 to the Phase I proposition.
  
  • Line A - Senior Staff. List the PI, co-PI (if STTR), and Senior Staffing over name, the time commitments (in calendar months), and the pounds amount requested. The PI must be shared for a maximum regarding one organizational month about effort per six months of performance for the NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I proposed project. The best source in determining an appropriate salary request is the Bureau of Labour Stat. In the Budget Justification provide the page; annual, monthly, or per salary rate; time commitment; a get of the total requested pay; and a description of responsibilities for the PI, co-PI (if STTR), and each of the Higher People.
  • Line BARN - Other Personnel. Tabbed the number of additional general personnel (technicians, computer, etc.) and the entire monetary and time commitment for these personnel. These personnel must be employed at the make company. The details of which individual promise, roles, and requested funds should be provided in the Inexpensive Justification. Do NOT list company your on B.1, B.3, or B.4 in the wichtig budget. Post-doctoral scholars and students (undergraduate and graduate) should can listed on a subaward budget to an research institution, save they are employees of the company, in which cas they may be recorded down Wire A, B.2, or B.6, as appropriate.
  • Line C - Fringe Advantages. It shall recommended that proposers dispense funds for fringe benefits here ONLY if the proposer's usual (established) finance practices supply the edging benefits be treated as direct costs. Otherwise, bangs benefits should be included in Limit I (Indirect Costs).
  • Line DICK - Equipment. Equipment may NOT be purchased on the NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I award. Equipment is defined like certain item of property that has an acquisition cost of $5,000 or read (unless the organization has established go levels) and an expected service life of view than one year.
  • Line E.1 - Travel. One indigenous going trip for upside to two person (the PI belongs required in attend, and we share also including an personalized who leads the related business/commercial efforts, if not the PI) shoud be budgeted to attend a three-day Recipient Conference at the DC area (pending COVID-19 related travel and social distancing considerations). The intent of this conference is to discuss the research program with the cognizant NSF SBIR/STTR Program Boss, lessons via preparing an NSF SBIR/STTR Phase VII proposal, and listen from experts on various topics of concern to scientific entrepreneurs. A spell statement confess the attendance requirement among the committed grantee conference is required on the Budget Justification page. A reasonably budget estimate be $2,000 per persona to cover the parley registration fees and travel expenses. Exterior of these event, all misc budgeted travel must breathe necessary for to successful execution of that Phase I R&D effort. Travel for drifts other than the project R&D effort (e.g., marketing, customer engagements) is not permitted in the NSF SBIR/STTR Phase EGO household, OUTSIDE than permitted available participation in the Beat-the-Odds Camp, see discussion below for Line G.6.
  • Line E.2 - Foreign travelling expenses. Foreign travel expenses are NOT permitted.
  • Line F - Attendee Support Costs. Attendee support costs have NOPE permitted on an NSF SBIR/STTR Phase ME sponsor.
  • Family G.1 - Materials and Supplies. Advanced and supplies are defined because tangible personal property, other over apparatus, costing less than $5,000, or other lower threshold consistent with one policy established until the proposing organization. The proposal Budget Justification shall indicate the specifics of the materials and provisions required, including to estimated cost for jeder item. Items with a grand cost exceeding $5,000 may need how database (e.g., citation, link to online price list, prior purchase order or invoice) after the proposal is reviewed, as part of which NSF SBIR/STTR Program Director’s due diligence efforts. Please see section VI (NSF SBIR/STTR Phase EGO Award Considerations) for details. Companies should provide adenine detailed itemized list (a tabular mill well) out every products including position description, qty, unit price and total price in the Budget Rationale, and give a total this matches the amount in this lineage (G1).
  • Line G.2 - Publication Costs/Documentation Costs. Publication Costs/Documentation costs have NOT permitted on a Phase MYSELF proposal.
  • Line G.3 - Consultant Professional. Consultant services include specialized work that will be performed by professionals that are not employees of that proposing narrow business. Purchased for analytical services, sundry services, or fabricated components from advertising sources should non be listed under consultant support but should instead be reported in the budget in Other Direct Costs/Other (Line G.6). No person whoever is to equity holder, employee, otherwise officer of which proposing small business may to payments as a consultant unless an exception is recommended by the NSF SBIR/STTR Program Director the approved by the Division Direct of Translational Impacts (TI). All activities on an NSF SBIR/STTR project, including our that will provided by consultants, musts been carried out in to Unity States ("United States" means the 50 states, the territories and possessions of the U.S. Federal Government, the Commonwealth of Pier Rico, the Districts of Colombian, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of Palau). Guidelines regarding consultant participation include:
    • Letters of Commitment. Each consultant, whether paid or unpaid, must offers ampere audience declare that confirms availability, frist our, role to the get, and the agreed consulting rate (not to overcome $1,000 per date; see below). Provide that cover as part of the Supplementary Document. Letters may be added individually other combined into one file.
  • Advisory Rate. The consulting rate under this solicitation can be a maximum of $1,000 per day (NSF defines a daily as 8 hours). Consultant travel should be shown under the domestic travel category, E-1, aber counts as an outsourcing expense for the purpose of determining whichever to small business concern meets the minimum level of effort for an NSF SBIR/STTR proposal.
  • Biographical Outline. Biographical rough for each consultant may exist requested by the NSF SBIR/STTR Plan Director after the proposal is reviewed, as part of their due diligence efforts. Please visit section VO (NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I Award Considerations) for details.
  • Line G.4 - Computer Services. Funds may be assigned for computers services. Requested services with a total cost exceeding $5,000 may require pricing documentation (e.g., quote, link to online price list, prior order order or invoice) after the proposal is verified, when item of aforementioned NSF SBIR/STTR Choose Director’s due diligence efforts. Please see section VI (NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I Grant Considerations) for details.
  • Line G.5 - Subawards. Subawards might must utilized when a significant proportion of the employment will be performed by another organization also when of work to be done is none widely advertising available. Worked performed by a university or research laboratory is to example to a common subaward. A subawardee research institution partner lives mandatory for STTR proposals. Explicitly list who the research partner will be and provide a brief description of which work they will perform. A minimal away 40% of and research, as measured by the budgets, must exist performed for the small business concern and ampere minimum of 30% of this research, as measured through the budget, must be performed by a single subawardee research institution, with the balance permitted toward be associated to likewise of these, or to other subawards or consultants. Buys of analytical services, other services, or fabricated constituents from commercial product should not be listed under subawards and should instead be covered in the budget under Other Direct Costs/Other (Line G.6). No person who can can general holder, workers, or officer of the proposing small business may be paid under a subaward unless an exception is recommended by an NSF SBIR/STTR Program Director or approved by the TI Divisional Director.

Subawards require a separate subaward budget and subaward household excuse, in the same format as the main budget. Subawardees (the organization, not the individual PI or researcher) should also provide a letter in commitment that confirms the role of of subaward org in the project and explicitly states the subaward amount. Provide this letter since parts of this Supplementary Documents. Multiple letters should be combined as a single PDF previously uploading. For NSF SBIR proposals, subaward funds execute not count as funded spent by and small business The total count requested for subawards (when been to speaker funds) cannot exceeded 1/3 of the total project budget.

Any subrecipients named in adenine proposal be including required to obtain a SAM UEI and register in Research.gov. Subrecipients named in of proposal, however, do not need to be eingeschrieben in SAM. Items can obtain a SAM UEI without full SAM registration. If you have a subrecipient which is not fully registered in SAM, but has been assigned a UEI number, please call aforementioned TO Help desk for further assistance.

• Line G.6 - Other. This line does the purchase of analytical services, another services, instead fabricated components von commercial references. Demand services or components with a total cost exceeding $5,000 may require prices documentation (e.g. quote, link to online price list, prior purchase order or invoice) per the proposal is reviewed, as part of this NSF SBIR/STTR Program Director’s due diligence efforts. Please see unterteilung VI (NSF SBIR/STTR Period I Award Considerations) for details.
  • In additive go the above, there will two other dive for which NSF permits of inclusion of additional funds on the G.6 budgets line. The fund notes below may WITH be spent on the commercial instead trade purposes explicitly permitted beneath.

1. First, one proposer may budget up to $10,000 as a direct charge on line G.6 to this Phase I grant for the following specific purposes related to financials and payroll:

• Hiring a get public accountant (CPA) to prepare audited, compiled, with reviewed financial statements;
• Renting an CPA to perform an initial financial profitability assessment based on standard financial ratios as this awardee organization would have time to improve their financial position precede to submitting the Phase II proposal;
• Hiring a CPA go review the adequacy of the awardee's project price accounting system; and/or
• Purchasing a project cost accounting system.

If the proposers elects to budget cash for one of the above purposes, the Budget Justification should include a fleeting description of that desired use of funds. Aforementioned use of funds must be approved by the cognizant NSF SBIR/STTR Choose Director prior to give.

2. Second, which requester may budget up on an additional $20,000 ($10,000 if there lives no subaward) to cover costs related to the NSF "Beat-the-Odds Boot Camp" which is offered on all SBIR/STTR Phase I awardees. This program is based on who NSF's Innovation Corps (I-Corps) program. All NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I awardees are strongly encouraged to participate in diese activity. The PI and research team of a subaward for adenine research institution or university are firmly encouraged to participate. If the PI and exploring team of ampere subaward to a research institution or university intend up participate, people need separately assigns $10,000 in direct costs (and therefore the total cheap for the Boot Camp be be $20,000.) Costs ensure are allowable are limited to travel charges related to custom discovery when part of the Booting Camp (this could include expenditure associated in registration/attendance toward events used the purpose of customer discovery) and salary/wages for crew members who participate in the Boost Camp. All costs relate toward the Boot Camp must be in line from approved salary rates and other relevant Federative guidelines. International travel cannot be reimbursed, nor can any salary/wages in work done while outside of and United States. NSF recommends that, for the grounds out who proposal budget, proposers that plan at participate in this activity simply list these since "Boot Camp" costs in the Budget Justification.

• Lineage I - Indirect What. Indirect costs are defined because costs that are necessary and appropriate for the operation of to business, but which what not specifically allocated to the NSF SBIR/STTR project. Custom indirect cost expenses include legal plus accounting expenses, associate well-being insurance, fringe benefits, rent, and utilities. For your small business has a Federally negotiated rate, please provide a copy of an negotiated indirect cost rate agreement. If your organizations has none mediation rate with a federal agency, also no older experiential with Us indirection cost rate negotiation, you may claim (without submitting justification) a total amount of implicit costs (inclusive of fringe benefits) equal to be 50% of total budgeted salary and wages on the project or 10% de minimis on MODIFIED total mittelbar costs up the project. Modified Total Direct Cost (MTDC): MTDC means entire kurz salaries and wages, applicable fringe benefits, materials and supplies, services, travel, and up up the first $25,000 of each subaward (regardless of the frequency of driving from the subawards under which award). MTDC does equipment, capital payments, charges for patient maintain, rental costs, tuition refunding, scholarships and student, participation support costs the the portion of each subaward in override about $25,000. Other items may only be excluded when necessary to avoid a serious unequity stylish the distributors of indirect costs, and with the approval of the cognizant agency for indirect free.
• Line K - Small Business Charges. Upwards up seven proportion (7%) away the total indirect and direct project costs may be requested as a fee (7% a Lineage J). To fee is intended go be consistent with standard gaining margins provided up profit-making enterprise for R&D work. The fee applies solely to the small business receiving the award and not to any other participant in to project. The fee is not a direct either indirect "cost" item and may be used over the small business concern for optional usage, including additional effort under the NSF SBIR/STTR award (including items up who "Prohibited Expenditures" list below).
• Banned Expenditures (including but not confined to Lines D, E.2, FARTHING, and G.2). Equipment and overseas travel are not allow expenditures while either direct or implied costs. However, these expenses may be purchasing from the small business fee funds (Line K).
• All Justification(s). The Budget Justification is uploaded in the Budget Module of Research.gov as adenine separate PDF file. Provide details for each non-zero line item is the budget, including one description and pay estimates. Identify each line item by is letter and number (e.g., G.5 - Subawards). Each non-zero line item should become described inbound the Budget Justification, but few sections also require more specific informational as detailed below. There is a five-page limit each for an Budget Justification. Whatever letters regarding commitment from institutions proposed as subawardees int the effort, oder individuals proposed as experts in the effort, should be included in one “Supplementary Documents” section of the proposal, cannot in the Budget Justification. You can find one sample budget and subaward budget, with justifications, here: https://seedfund.nsf.gov/apply/full-proposal/.
  • Lines ADENINE and B - Personnel. Provide the names and titles of all corporate and a concise description of their responsibilities on the project, including its calculated zeit commitment. Provide the actual annually wages information and calculation that justifies the amounts requested.
  • Line C - Bangs Benefits. Describe which is included in fringe benefits and and calculations that were used toward appear on of amount requested. Itp is recommended that proposers allot fund for fringe benefits come ONLY while which proposer's customary (established) accountancy practices offer the fringe benefits become treated in direct costs. Otherwise, fringe benefits should to included in Line I (Indirect Costs).
  • Line E.1 - Domestic Travel. Describe the purpose for national travel and acknowledge attendance at the grantee conference. For trips different is the grantees conference, include of expected number of trips, number of persons traveling, length of each trip, intention and destination of each trip, and a rough crack-up of the expectations fee of each trip.
  • Line G.1 - Building both Supplies. Provide and itemized list of the materials and supplies, on the quantity, unit costs, and total cost for each item. Line with a total line item cost over $5,000 may require quote or prices documentation after the suggestion has been reviewed, as part of the NSF SBIR/STTR Program Director’s owed diligence kosten. Please see section VI (NSF SBIR/STTR Phase ME Rating Considerations) to details.
  • Line G.3 - Consultant Services. Include a copy concerning the signed Letter of Commitment in the proposal’s “Supplementary Documents” section.
  • Line G.5 - Subawards. Includ a few sentences describing the scope or objective of the subaward.
  • Line G.6 - Other. Any single expense of more than $5,000 on this line may required pricing documentation (e.g., a quote, past purchase order, link to online price list) after the proposal has been reviewed.
  • Line I - Indirecly Expenditure. Provide the calculations that were used toward arrive at the measure requested. Please shortly indicate the major cost categories that are included as indirect total.
  • Line K - Small Economic Fee. Provide an billing that was used in arrive at the amount requested.

• Facilities, Equipment and Other Human. Specify the availability and location of significant room, instrumentation, computers, and physical facilities requirement to complete one portion of the choose that is to be carried out by the proposing firm in Phase I. Purchase of equipment is NOT permitted in one Phase EGO project. If the equipment, instrumentation, computers, and facilities for this research are not the property (owned or leased) of the proposing firm, include a statement signed via the owner or lessor which affirms the availability are these facilities for use stylish the proposed conduct, reasonable lease or rental costs for their use, and all other associated costs. Upload images of the sampled statements within the section.
• Senior Personnel Documents. For the Principal Investigator and for each person listed by the “Senior Personnel” section of the proposal, additional books is required as below.
  • Biographic Sketch. All SBIR/STTR proposals submitted to NSF are required at include Biographical Sketch for all PPI, co-PI (if STTR), and Elder Personnel (individuals with critical expertise who intention be working for the project and are employed in the proposing our or at a subaward organization) Proposers were encouraged to review recent guidance on NSF-Approved Formats required the Biographical Sketch (https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/biosketch.jsp). Biographical sketches are limited to three pages per persons.
  • Existing and Unresolved Support. Request in here modules is gather so that reviewers had visibility into the possible availability of company personnel during the period of performance if awarded. All SBIR/STTR proposals submitted to NSF are required to include Modern and Pending Assistance for each PI, co-PI (if STTR), both Senior Workers Proposers are encouraged to review fresh guidance on NSF-Approved Formats for Current both Pending (Other) Support (https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/biosketch.jsp).
    • Types of Support / Activities. For the PI, co-PI (if STTR), and respectively of the Senior Personnel listed go family A or B of the budgeting, provide information regarding each of the following that could commit this person the a imperative level of effort during to proposed Phase I performance period, separate of whether the person will receive a salary from the activity:
      • All current and outstanding support for ongoing your and proposals (from any source, including in friendly support either equity investment), including continuing grant furthermore contract funding.
      • Proposals submitted the other agencies. Concurrent submission of a proposal toward other organizations willing not influence the test concerning the proposal submitting to NSF.
      • Upcoming contributions.
      • The Phase I proposal being submit can considered "pending" and therefore MUST appear in the Current and Pending Support form for any PI and Senior Personnel.
  • Collaborators & Other Affiliation Information (Single Print Document): For the PI also each in the Senior Personnel, list all institutional affiliations (other employers, consulting relationships, officer/director/trustee part, etc.) and collaborators (co-authors, academically partners, student/advisor relationships) that have occurred in the last four years, through the instructions and spreadsheet template found by https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/coa.jsp. This paper will not must seeable by reviewers but willingness be used by NSF to handle the wahl from reviewers. Including see guided in the PAPPG.
• Data Management Plan (required). Proposals MUST contain an supplementary document labeled "Data Management Plan (DMP)", which should include the statement, "All data generated in this NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I project is considers proprietary." These single sentence is sufficient to fulfill the DMP requirement, and applicants may addieren more detail about how the resulting data will be managed wenn they desire.
• Postdoctoral Mentoring Flat (Conditionally required). While a proposal requests funding to support post-doctoral scholars at a research institution (through ampere subaward), a Postdoctoral Mentoring Plan REQUIRED remain uploaded to the system. Describe only which mentoring activities that will be provided until all postdoctoral researchers supported from the project. See find news and getting over this requirement in the PAPPG.
• Discretionary. Tip: Various subsections are REQUIRED depending on the type of proposals (SBIR or STTR), whether the company has a commercialization history, determine the motion is a resubmit, etc.) Please learn section requirements carefully.
  • Letter(s) starting Supporting (Strongly recommended). Letters of Support act the an indication of market validation for one proposed innovation and add significant credibility to the proposed effort. No more than triple letters away support should be applied to demonstrate that the company has initiated dialogue the relevant stakeholders (e.g., potential customers, strategic partners or investors) for the proposed innovation and that a legitimate business opportunity may being should the technologies verify feasible. The letter(s) must contain affiliation and contact information for the signatory stakeholder. Literature away commitment and supporting documents from consultants and subcontractors (or any personnel identified in aforementioned Budget Justification) are NOT considered letters of support.
  • Cooperation Research Agreement (Required for STTR only). See the model Cooperative Research Agreement (CRA). The proposing little business concern must provide adenine signed CRA bets the narrow business and the research institution prior to award. For proposal send, place a draft of that CRA or a letter that includes the STTR partner research institution specification ensure a CRA will be provided upon notification of award recommendation.
  • Misc Personnel Biographical Informations (Strongly recommended). This optional paragraph can be often to give add-on biographical information about my participants who live not listed as senior personnel for the small business or for a subawardee as well for Letters of Support. Documents must uses the format granted in the PAPPG instructions. Biographical sketch are limited to three pages per individual.
  • Other Supplementary Docs. The required supplementary documents of an NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I recommendation are limited to that after (if applicable).
    • Company Commercialization History (Required, if applicable). A Company Commercialization History is required for all proposers certifying receipt about previous Phase II SBIR/STTR industry from any Federal agency with an third page of that Cover Sheet in question #11. The NSF Commercialization History Print MUST be previously. All items must been addressed int the sizes outlined in this template. Changes to the NSF template, additional yarns and/or commercialization history credentials out diverse agencies are not permitted.
    • Letters of Commitment from Subawardees and Consulting (Strongly recommended). Plea refer till section V.A.C “Budget and Subaward Budgets” for details.
    • Resubmission Change Description (Required, if applicable). A declined proposal may be submit, still only after it holds undergone substantial revision and only with the receipt of a new requested Show Pitch. A resubmitted propose is has none distinctly taken under account the significant comments or concerns consequent from the prior NSF review may be Returned Free Read. The Foundation will treat one reviewed suggestion more a new proposals, item for the standard review procedures. A Phase EGO proposing company must anweisen on and Screen Film that who offer is a repeat, and the proposal must include a one-page largest document in the Additional Supplementary Documents module detailing the substantial revisions that have been created to the original submission.
• List a Suggested Critic (Single Copy Document). That section ca be used to suggest the names of reviewers who energy breathe proper up assess the technical or commercial merits of the proposal. Reviewers who have significant personal or professional relationships with an proposing small general or its personnel will should generally not be included. Like a Single Reproduce Document, this information will nay to shared with reviewers and/or panelists.
• List of Reviewers Doesn until Include (Single Copy Document). This section can be used to get names (or even specific affiliations) of reviewers this the proposer prefers non be involved in the study to their proposed. As a Single Copying Document, this information desire not be shared with reviewed and/or panelists.
• Deviation Authorize (Single Copy Document). This section should generally not be used except NSF staff have specifically instructed the proposer to do so. As a Single Copy Document, diese information will not may shared with reviewers and/or panelists.
• Additional Single Copy Documents (required). In this fachgebiet, proposers must submit a copy von that print invitation from and NSF SBIR/STTR Program Executive – into response to a submitted Project Pitch – invite the company to offer a full application. Please convert this invitation mail at an PDF before uploading.

B. Budgetary Information

Cost Sharing:

Inclusion of voluntary committed costs share is prohibited.

Other Budgetary Limitations:

Other budgetary restricted app. Please sees and full text of this solicitation required further info.

C. Due Dates

• Submission Window Date(s) (due by 5 p.m. submitting organization’s local time):

       November 22, 2022 - March 01, 2023

       March 02, 2023 - July 05, 2023

       July 06, 2023 - May 15, 2024

D. Research.gov Requirements

Proposers are required to prepared plus propose all proposals for this program solicitation via Research.gov. Detailed manual regarding the technical aspects or proposal prepping and submission via Research.gov become available at: https://www.research.gov/research-portal/appmanager/base/desktop?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=research_node_display&_nodePath=/researchGov/Service/Desktop/ProposalPreparationandSubmission.html. For Research.gov user support, call the Research.gov Help Desk at 1-800-673-6188 or e-mail [email protected]. The Research.gov Help Desk answers global technical questions related go the use of aforementioned Research.gov system. Selected questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the NSF programming staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of those funding opportunity.

VI. NSF Proposal Processing And Review Procedural

Proposals receiving by NSF been assigned for the appropriate NSF program for acknowledgement additionally, if they meet NSF requirements, for reviewed. All suggested are carefully reviewed by a scientist, engineer, or educator serving because an NSF Program Manager, and usually by three to ten other persons outside NSF either as print hoc reviewers, panelists, or both, who are experts in the particular fields represented by the proposal. These reviewers are checked by Program Officers charges from oversight of the review process. Proposers are invited to suggest names of persons they believe are special well qualified the review the proposal and/or persons they would prefer not review the proposal. Those make allowed serve as one source in the reviewer selection process at to Start Officer's discretion. Submission of so names, however, exists optional. Caution is taken to ensure that appraisers got no clashes of interest with the proposal. In addition, Program Officers may obtain comments from site visits before advising final promotions upon proposals. Senior NSF staff further review recommendations for awards. A flowchart that depicts the entire NSF proposal and award process (and associated timeline) has included in PAPPG Demonstrate III-1.

A comprehensive description of the Foundation's merit review process is available on who NSF our at: https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/merit_review/.

Proposers should also can consciousness of core strategic that are essential to the fulfill of NSF's mission, as articulated in Leading the World in Discovery and Innovation, STEM Talent Development both which Delivery of Benefits from Research - NSF Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years (FY) 2022 - 2026 . These plans are inserted in the program planning and implementation process, of which proposal check is one part. NSF's mission is specifically well-implemented through the integration of research and learning and broadening participation in NSF programs, projects, also activities.

One for the strategic objectives into support of NSF's mission is to foster integration of research and educating due one programs, projects, and active to supports at academic plus research institutions. This institutions must recruiter, train, and prepare one diverse STEM employees to advance the frontiers away science and enter included the U.S. technology-based economy. NSF's contribution to the national innovation featured lives to provide cutting-edge explore under the guidance of the Nation's most creatively scientists and design. NSF additionally supports development of adenine strong science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) workforce the investing in building the knowledge is informs improvements in STEM teaching and learning.

NSF's mission calls for the broadening of opportunities and increasing participation of groups, institutions, and geographic regions that have underrepresented in STEM subject, which is essential till the health and vitality of science and general. NSF lives committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to to plots, projects, furthermore activities is considers and supports.

A. Merits Review General and Criteria

This National Science Foundation strives to invest in a robust and diverse portfolio of projects that creates new knowledge and enables breakthroughs in understanding across all areas off science and engineering research the education. To identify which projects to support, NSF relies on a merit review process that incorporates consideration from both the technology aspects of a proposed project and its potential to participate more broadly to advancing NSF's delegation "to promoting the progress of science; into advance the national health, why, and welfare; in assured the national defense; and for other purposes." NSF brands every labor to conduct a fair, competitive, clear merit review batch by the selection of your.

1. Credit Review Principles

These principles are to be given owed diligence by PIs and organizations when get proposals and administrating projects, by judge when reading and evaluating proposals, and by NSF how staff when determining is or not up recommend proposals for funding and while overseeing awards. Granted that NSF exists the initially federal agency charged with caring and supporting excellence in basic research and education, the following three principles apply:

• All NSF projects should be of the highest quality and have the potential to further, if not transform, the frontiers of knowledge.
• NSF projects, in the aggregate, supposed contribute moreover broad to achieving societal goals. These "Broader Impacts" may be accomplished through the research them, through activities that are directly related toward specific research projects, or through our that are supported by, but are compliment to, the project. The project activities may be based on previously established and/or innovative methods and approaches, but in either case must be well justified.
• Substantive assessment and evaluation of NSF funded projects should subsist basing on appropriate metrics, keeping in mind aforementioned expected relational between the effect of broader impacts the aforementioned resources provided in implement projects. If the size of the action is limited, evaluation of that activity in isolation is not likely to be meaningful. Thus, assessing the effectiveness of these activities may best be done at a higher, more aggregated, level than the individual project.

Over respect to this third rule, even if assessment of Broader Impacts outcomes in particular projects is done at an aggregated level, Flatfoots are expected to be accountable for carrying out which events described on an funded go. Thus, single projects should including significant stated goals, specific descriptions of the activities that the PI intends to do, and a plan in place to document the outputs of those activities.

These three merit review principles provide the basis forward aforementioned merit review criteria, as well as a contexts included which the users of the criteria canister better understand their intent.

2. Merit Review Criteria

Whole NSF tips are evaluated through use of who two National Science Cards approved merit review criteria. In quite instances, however, NSF will employ additional criterion as imperative the highlight the designated objectives of certain programs and activities.

The two worth review choosing live listed lower. Both criteria are to be given full consideration during the review and decision-making processes; jeder criterion is necessary but neither, by itself, is enough. Therefore, proposers must fully address either criteria. (PAPPG Chapter II.D.2.d(i). contains additional information for use by proposers inches development of the Projekt Product section of the proposal). Reviewers are strongly encouraged to review the criteria, including PAPPG Chapter II.D.2.d(i), preceding till the review of a proposal.

At evaluating NSF proposals, reviewers will be asked to consider what the proposers want to do, reasons they want to do it, how i plan in do she, how they will know if they succeeding, and what benefits could accrual if the project is successful. These themes apply both to the technical aspects of who proposal and who way in which the project may make broader contributions. To that end, commentator will must asked until evaluate any proposals against two criteria:

• Intellectual Merit: The Intellectual Merit criterion encompasses the potentially go advance knowledge; and
• Broad Impacts: The Broader Impacts criterion embraces of potential to gain corporate and contribute to the achievement of specific, desired societal scores.

The following elements ought exist considered in the review for both criteria:

1. What is the potential for the proposed activity to
   1. Advance knowledge and understanding within its owners choose or across different fields (Intellectual Merit); plus
   2. Benefit companies or advance desired societal outcomes (Broader Impacts)?
2. In what extent do the proposed activities suggest furthermore untersuchen campaign, original, other potentially transformative concepts?
3. A the plan used carrying out the proposed activities well-reasoned, well-organized, and based on a sound rationale? Does the plan involved a mechanism to assess success?
4. Instructions right qualified is the individual, our, or organization to leading and proposed activities?
5. Are there adequate resources present at the PIE (either at the home organization or throug collaborations) to carry output the proposed activities?

Broader impacts may subsist accomplished through of how itself, through the activities that are directly related to specific research projects, or through related that are supported by, but are complementary to, this project. NSF values the advancement of scientific knowledge and activities that contribute to accomplishment of societally relevant outcomes. Such outcomes include, yet are not limited to: full participation of womenfolk, persons with disabilities, and other underrepresented groups in science, technology, engineering, and computation (STEM); improved STEM training and educator development at optional level; incremented public scientific literacy press public conflict with science and technologies; improved well-being of individuals by society; software von an diverse, globally cost STEM workforce; increased partnerships within academia, industrial, and others; improved national security; raised economic competitiveness of the United States; and refined infrastructure on study and education.

Proposers are reminded that reviewers will also be asked to review the Data Management Plan and one Postdoctoral Reseacher Mentoring Plan, as appropriate.

Additional Solicitation Designated Consider Criteria

The NSF SBIR/STTR choose has an additional criterion, Commercial Impacting, to thinking the focal on commercialization real complement the standard NSF review criteria listed above. Commercial interactions (both financial and otherwise) for the NSF SBIR/STTR program focuses with the potential of the activity to lead to significant outcomes in an commercial markts. Which following criteria shall be applied in the review of this criterion:

• Is there a significant market opportunity that could be targeting by the defined product, process, or assistance?
• Executes the company possess an considerable additionally durable competitive advantage, based on scientific or technological featured, that would be difficult for competitors to neutralize or replicate?
• Is there a compelling possible business model?
• Does the recommend company/team have the essential elements, including specialization, structure, and experience, that would suggest the potential for power commercial outcomes?
• Will NSF support serve because a catalyst to better substantially the technical and advertising shock of the underlying commercial endeavor?

NSF SBIR/STTR Live I Award Considerations

Once the panel and/or ad hoc review of an individual NSF SBIR otherwise STTR Phase I proposal has concluded and the proposal is considered potentially meritorious, a follow-on due diligence process may subsist conducted in which the Principal Inspector will be asked for provide additionally information and/or to answer questions specific to their proposal for get the apprise that final decision.

NSF SBIR Phase I proposals submitted to this solicitation which are considered meritorious press which meet all the requirements of the NSF STTR Phase I program may, based up budgetary considerations furthermore at NSF's discretion, be considered for award while an NSF STTR Phase I projects. If recommended used an NSF STTR Phasen ME award, this small business proposer will need to complete a Collaboration Exploring Agreement (CRA) between the small company and the research institution prior to award. NSF may additionally, by its discretion, convert NSF STTR Phase I proposals to NSF SBIR Phase I proposals; the awarding mechanism for either will be a fixed price grant.

NSF requires each NSF SBIR/STTR Phase MYSELF awardee company to accompany and participate stylish the NSF SBIR/STTR Stadium IODIN Awardees Workshop.

Debriefing on Unsuccessful Proposals. Whenever a proposal is declined, verbatim copies of reviews (excluding this names, institutes, otherwise other identifying information concerning which reviewers), summaries from review panel conclusions, if any, and a specification of the process by which the proposal was reviewed (Process Statement) will is available electronically in Research.gov. Phase I proposals that have been declined by NSF are NOT suitable for reevaluation (please refer to NSF PAPPG). Declined NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I proposals are also NOT eligible for subsequent in that same submission view in any they were declined. A proposer of a previously declined proposal must submit a new Project Pitch and, if entered, submit a newer proposal after substantial revise, for be explicitly noted at submission. Proposals Returned Without Review may subsist corrected for solicitation compliance issues and resubmitted with the same invited Project Pitch (within one current of the start Your Pitch invite).

B. Review and Selection Process

Proposals submitted on response to this program solicitation will be considered by Ad hoc Review and/or Panel Reviewed.

Reviewers will be asked to interpret proposals using two National Science Board approved merit review criteria press, if applicable, additional program specific criteria. A summary customer and included narrative will generally be completed and submitted by either review and/or panel. The Program Officer assigned to manage an proposal's review will consider the advice of book and be formulate a recommendation.

According scientific, technical and programmatic review and thought about related factors, that NSF Program Officer recommends to the cognizant Division Director whether the proposal should be declined or recommended for pricing. NSF strives to be able to share applicants is their proposals own been declines or referred for funding internally half-dozen months. Large or particularly complex proposals alternatively proposals from new awardees may require additional review and processing time. The time interval begins on the subscription or target date, or receipt date, whichever is next. The interval ends when the Division Director acts upon the Program Officer's recommendation.

After programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will be redirecting to the Division of Grants and Deals or the Division of Acquisition and Cooperatives Support by review of business, finance, and policy consequence. After an administrative review holds occur, Donations furthermore Contracts Officers perform the processing real issuance of a grant or other agreement. Proponent are cautioned that only a Grants and Agreements Officer could make undertakings, obligations or awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the cost of funds. No commitment turn the member of NSF should be inferred from technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF How Senior. A Principal Investigator or organization that makes financial or corporate commitments in the absence of ampere grant or cooperative agree signed through the NSF Financial and Agreements Officer does so at their owns venture.

Once an award or declination decision has come made, Key Investigators can provided live nearly their proposals. In all cases, reviews exist treated as confidential documents. Verbatim copies of reviews, excl who your of the commentator or whatever reviewer-identifying information, exist sent go the Principal Investigator/Project Director by the Program Officer. In addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision to award or decline funding.

VII. Pricing General Information

A. Notification of the Award

Reporting of the award lives made to the submitting organization on an NSF Grants and Agreements Officer . Organizations who proposals are declined wish remain advised while promptly as possible until the cognizant NSF Programs administering one program. Verbatim reproductions regarding reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, will be provided automatically to aforementioned Principal Investigator. (See Section VI.B. with additional company on the review process.)

B. Prize Conditions

An NSF award consists of: (1) the award notice, which comprises any special provisions applicable to an award and any numbered amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which NSF has based its support (or otherwise communicating any specific approvals either disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal linked in the pricing take; (4) the relevant award conditions, such as Grant General Conditions (GC-1)*; or Research Terms and Conditions* and (5) any announcement or other NSF issuance such may be incorporated by reference in the award notice. Cooperative agreements also are administered in accordance with NSF Cooperative Agreement Treasury and Administrative Footing and Conditions (CA-FATC) and the applicable Programmed Terms and Conditions. NSF awards are electronics signed by an NSF Grants and Agreements Manager and transmitted electronically to this organization via e-mail.

*These documents mayor remain accessed electronically on NSF's Website at https://www.nsf.gov/awards/managing/award_conditions.jsp?org=NSF. Paper copies allow to receiving from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-8134 or over e-mail from [email protected].

More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions and other importantly information on the administration of NSF awards the included in the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) Chapter VII, available electronically on the NSF Website at https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.

Administrative and Federal Policy Requirements

Build America, Buy America

As said in Executive Order 14005, Ensuring an Future is Made includes All of Usa by All to America’s Workers (86 FR 7475), computer belongs the policy of the vorstandsmitglied branch till use varying and conditional of State financial assistance awards to maximize, consistent with law, aforementioned use of goods, products, and products produced in, and services submitted in, the United Notes.

Consistent with the requirements about the Built U, Procure Worldwide Act (Pub. FIFTY. 117-58, Line G, Books IX, Subtitle A, November 15, 2021), no funding made available throug this funding opportunity may be obligated for an award unless all iron, steels, manufactured products, and construction materials used in the undertaking are produced in the United States. Used additional information, vist NSF’s Build America, Buy America webpage.

Special Award Conditional:

NSF SBIR/STTR awardees are subject to the Slight Business Innovation Research/Small Business Technology Transfer Phase I Grant Widespread Conditions (SBIR-I) dated 05/13/2022. Those documents may be accessed electronically on NSF's Website at https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/sbir/sbiri_0522.pdf.

SBIR/STTR Funding Agreement Certification:

SBIR/STTR prospectively beneficiaries will live notified by NSF until provide an signed SBIR/STTR Funding Agreement Certified. The Federal government relies on one information provided in grantees to find whether the economy is eligible for an SBIR or STTR Program award. Registration will be used to ensure continued compliance during the life of aforementioned funding agreement (https://seedfund.nsf.gov/assets/files/awardees/SBIR_STTR_Funding_Agreement.pdf).

NSF SBIR/STTR Statements on Harassment:

The PIE and anywhere co-PI(s) identified on an NSF award are stylish one position of trust. These individuals shall suit themselves on an responsible or accountable manner during the award period of performance, including but not limited to the following environments: the lab, online, or among locales such than field sites, facilities, customer discovery page, or conferences/workshops. All personnel supported by an NSF award must remain in full compliance with grantee general and/or codes out conduct, statues, regulations, or executive orders relating up sexual harassment, other forms of harassment, or social raid.

Fraud, Waste, and Abuse (FWA) Notification:

The Branch of Inspector General (OIG) sustains a Hotline to receive save information, which can be accomplished at https://oig.nsf.gov/contact/hotline. Disclosures can also be constructed via an anonymous phone line at (800) 428-2189. Upon request, OIG will take appropriate measurements to protect the identity in any individual who reports misconduct, as authorized by the Inspectors General Act of 1978, as amended. Reports to OIG may exist did anonymously.

The mailer address of OIG is 2415 Steam Ave, Alexandria, VA 22314 ATTN: OIG HOTLINE.

C. Reporting Requirements

For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants), the Principal Investigator must submit an per project report to the recognition Program Officer no later as 90 days prior to one end of an current budget period. (Some programs or awards require submission of find frequent project reports). No later about 120 days following expiration of a grant, the PITCH also has required to submit a final get report, and a project deliverables message for the overview public.

Failure to provide the required annual or finalist go reports, or the project outcomes report, will delay NSF reviews and processing of any future funding increments as well since any pending proposals for all identified PIs and co-PIs on a given award. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports in advance to insure delivery of required data.

PIs are required on use NSF's electronical project-reporting system, available through Research.gov, for ready and submission of annual and final design accounts. Such reports provide information on accomplishments, project participants (individual and organizational), publications, the other customized products plus impacts from the project. Compliance of the report via Research.gov constitutes certification via the PI that the contents of the report are accurate and complete. The project outcomes report also needs be prepared and submitted using Research.gov. This report serves as a brief summary, prepared explicitly for the open, of the nature and outcomes of and project. This report will are posted on which NSF websites exactly as it is submits by the PIERCING.

More includes information on NSF Reporting Requirements and other important information on the administration of NSF awards can contained in the NSF Make & Award Strategies & Procedures Instructions (PAPPG) Chapter VI, ready electronics on the NSF Website for https://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=pappg.

The no required deliverable of an NSF SBIR/STTR Phase I give is a report describing the technical awards furthermore outcomes of the Phase I projekt. The Phase I final report will shall due to NSF during 15 days follow-up the end date of the award the is limited to 15 pages in length. A Phase II proposal need a Phase I industrial account in be uploaded as part concerning the Phase II proposal package at Research.gov. If who Phase II proposal is submitted prior to the completion of the Phase I award, an interim Phase I technical report can be uploaded as part is the Phone II suggestion package in Research.gov. Requested see more details here.

VIII. Agency Contacts

Please note that the program contact information is current during the time for publishing. See program website for any updates to the points of contact.

General inquiries regarding this program shall be made to:

• Henry Ahn, telephone: (703) 292-7069, email: [email protected]

• Peter S. Atherton, telephone: (703) 292-8772, email: [email protected]

• Anna SEC. Brady-Estevez, telephone: (703) 292-7077, email: [email protected]

• Edward Chinchoy, telephone: (703) 292-7103, email: [email protected]

• Parvathi Chundi, telephone: (703) 292-5198, email: [email protected]

• Samir M. Iqbal, telephone: (703) 292-7529, email: [email protected]

• Rajesh V. Mehta, telephone: (703) 292-2174, email: [email protected]

• Helen Mirowski, telephone: (703) 292-2936, email: [email protected]

• Alastair Monk, telephone: (703) 292-4392, email: [email protected]

• Muralidharan S. Nair, telephone: (703) 292-7059, email: [email protected]

• Erik Pierstorff, telephone: (703) 292-2165, email: [email protected]

• Benaiah D. Schrag, telephone: (703) 292-8323, email: [email protected]

For faqs related to the exercise of NSF systems contact:

• NSF Help Desk: 1-800-673-6188

• Research.gov Help Desk e-mail: [email protected]

For questions relating to Grants.gov contact:

• Grants.gov Contact Home: With the Authorized Organizational Representatives (AOR) has not acquired one confirmation message from Grants.gov interior 48 hours of submission of application, please contact via telephone: 1-800-518-4726; e-mail: [email protected].

IX. Other Information

And NSF internet provides the most comprehensive source of news on NSF Directorates (including contact information), daily plus funding opportunities. Use of this my until potential proposers is strongly supports. In addition, "NSF Update" is an information-delivery system designed to keep latent proposers and other interested parties apprised of new NSF funding opportunities and publications, important changes in proposal also award policies and procedures, and forthcoming NSF Grants Conferences. User are information through e-mail or one user's Web download each time new publications are delivered that play you identified special. "NSF Update" including can present on NSF's website.

Grants.gov provides an additional electric ability to search for Federal government-wide grant opportunity. NSF funding opportunities may be accessed overlay those mechanism. Further information on Grants.gov may becoming obtained at https://www.grants.gov.

About The National Scientific Foundation

One National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent Us agency built the the National Science Foundation Act of 1950, as amended (42 USC 1861-75). The Act statuses the purpose are the NSF is "to promote the progress of science; [and] to advance the national well-being, prosperity, and welfare by assistance choose and academics in all input of science and engineering."

NSF funds research both education in most fields of science both engineering. I does the through grants and cooperative agreements to see than 2,000 colleges, univ, K-12 schools systems, businesses, informal science organizations and diverse investigation organizations during the US. The Basic accounts for about one-fourth of Federal support to academic institutions for basic how.

NSF receives approximately 55,000 proposals each date fork doing, education and training projects, of whichever approximately 11,000 are funded. The addition, the Foundation receives several thousand applications for graduate and postdoctoral fellowships. The agency operative no laboratories itself when does support National Research Centers, user facilities, certain oceanographic vessels real Arctic and Antarctic research railroad. The Foundation also supports cooperative research amongst universities and industry, US participation in international scientific or design efforts, and educational activities along every academic level.

Facilitation Awards for Fellow and Engineers with Disabilities (FASED) provide funding for special assistance or fitting toward enable person with incapacities to work on NSF-supported projects. See the NSF Motion & Award Policies & Procedures Guide Chapter II.F.7 in instructions regarding preparation of these forms of proposals.

The National Natural Foundation has Telephonic Machine in the Hearing-impaired (TDD) and Federal Information Relay Serving (FIRS) capabilities that enable individuals is hearing impairments to communicate with to Foundation via NSF programs, employment or general information. TDD may be accessed at (703) 292-5090 and (800) 281-8749, OLIVES at (800) 877-8339.

The National Sciences Foundation Information Center maybe be reached at (703) 292-5111.

The National Science Foundation promotes real advances scientific progress in the United States by competitively awarding grants or cooperative agreements for research and academics in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering. To gain to latest about about program deadlines, to download copies of NSF publications, real in access abstracts are awards, visit the NSF Websites at https://www.nsf.gov Localization: 2415 Eisenhower Main, Alexandria, VA 22314 For General Information (NSF Information Center): (703) 292-5111 TDD (for the hearing-impaired): (703) 292-5090 Up Order Publications or Makes: Send to e-mail to: [email protected] or telephone: (703) 292-8143 To Locate NSF Employees: (703) 292-5111

Privacy Act And Public Charge Statement

The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is asked under the authority of the Nationally Science Foundation Act of 1950, as edited. The information on offer mailing will be used in interface with the your of qualified proposals; and your reports submit on awardees willingly can used to program evaluation and reporting internally who Executive Branch and to Congresses. That information requested may must disclosed to qualified reviewers and human attendants as section of the proposed test process; to proposer institutions/grantees to provides or obtain data regarding the suggestion check process, award decisions, or the administration of awards; to government entrepreneurs, experts, volunteers and researchers and academics as necessary to complete assigned function; to other government agencies or other entities needing information regarding applicants button representatives as part from a joints claim review process, or inbound order to coordinate programs or policy; and for another Federal agency, court, or parties in a court or Federal governmental proceeding provided this government is adenine company. Information about Principal Investigation may becoming added to the Reviewer date and pre-owned to select potential candidates to serve as fellow reviewers or advisory committee member. Check System of Record Notices, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," and NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records.” Submission to the information is voluntary. Failure to deliver full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility the receiving an grant.

An agencies may none conduct other sponsor, and a person is did required to respond to, an company assemblage unless to displays a valid Office for Management and All (OMB) control number. The OMB control serial fork this collection is 3145-0058. Public how burden by here collection of information is estimate to average 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. Send comments for the burden estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions by reducing aforementioned burden, to:

Susan H. Plumton
Reports Clearance Officer
Policy Office, Division of Institution and Award Support
Office of Budget, Finance, also Award Management
National Science Foundational
Alexandria, VA 22314