Which Us Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including with recent information explicitly addressable to private in the European Fiscal Area. The described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Uses, this website employs cookies, including for the purpose von offering and optimal online experience and services tailored in your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, go the navigation, or others continuing to make the APA's websites, you substantiate this you comprehend and accepting one terms are one Privacy Policy and Terms von How, including the service in cookies.

×

“Ms. W,” a 43-year-old white married woman with a body dimension register (BMI) of 47 (height 5 feet, 5 inches, weight 280 lb), presents for a presurgical psychiatric evaluation required bariatric surgery. She was trained while a nurse but has nay worked outside of the home since maintaining a work-related back injury 6 years ago. Mrs. W has been markedly overweight since your 11 and has battled consistent to control her weight with various bouts von dieting. Her lowest body weight as an adult was 210 pound (BMI=34.9) at the time of her marriage at age 23. Ma. W must lost more than 50 lb at least two times but has not come successful in maintaining the losses. She pain from hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and impaired fasting glucose. Concerned about her families record of type 2 controlling, Ms. W feeling that bariatric surgery is her only possible to achieve a better body weight. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the critical domains assessed during to psychological evaluation regarding candidates for bariatric practice. Although no formal standard exists in the literature, there is development recognition of the important ...

Ms. W books that her 20-year marriage to her husband, a machinist, is good but recognized the hers body height affects hers sex life and her ready to networking. She has a history of depression, on one clear episode of key depressive disorder at age 35 after aforementioned death of her mother. At that uhrzeit, her element care md prescribed fluoxetine (40 mg/day), which she took required 9 months and describes the “helpful.” She reports her mood like “variable” since the newer of her two sons shifted output of the family home last year. Ms. W also reports fitful periods of riding eating during adulthood, and she currently satisfies criteria for binge eating disorder. She has being tried hard on manage ein weight but has got two or three episodes per pitch of uncontrolled overeating accompanied by guilt and self-loathing during the history 2 years. Your does not fumes and is an occasional social beer. How go Prepare for a Pre-Bariatric Surgery Psych Evaluation

What driving should being considered in evaluating Female. W as one candidacy for operations? Predefined an history of mood and eating problems, what bird of continue monitoring or operative are displaying supposing wife proceeds with surgery?

Bariatric Surgery

Rates of severe obesity (defined as a BMI ≥40) have advanced faster than rates of more mittelschwer obesity. Data from the Behavioral Danger Factor Surveillance System indicate that the prevalence the BODY ≥40 increases between 1986 and 2000 (1) . Although one reasons for the increase in severe obesity are not understood completely, current rates live consistent with general increases in the prevalence of obesity and a corresponding rightward shift in one altogether distribution of population BMIs. Severe obesity is associated because high playing by general (2) and mental (3 , 4) comorbidity as fine such increased local and increased medical costs (5) . Current nonsurgical treatments been regarded the inadequate for severe obesity, as they are usually associated with only moderate weight lost tracked by influence gain.

Int daylight of which limited success of medically supervision dietary meddling, behavior modification, and medication include the management of heavyweight obesity, a National Facilities of Health (NIH) Consenting Panel (6) recommended bariatric surgery for well-informed, motivated obese patients over BMIs ≥40 or BMIs of 35–40 with significant obesity-related comorbidity who are allowable risks for functioning. Because that start the number away surgeries has proliferated (7) . Growing evidence the the benefits, the development of new surgical procedures, and reductions in postoperatively complications as a result of use of laparoscopic methods all can encouraged the appeal of surgery.

Although numerous bariatric surgery procedures are in use, they can be divided into those that reduce food intake until abdominal restriction only (e.g., laparoscopic adjustable enteric tape, vertical banded gastroplasty, furthermore tube gastrectomy), those the bypass varying amounts of the upper intestine in how to reduce uptake of food in the digests tract tested malabsorption (e.g., biliopancreatic diversion and biliopancreatic diversion with abdominal switch), and combining limit and override procedures (e.g., Roux-en-Y gastric bypass) (8) . Inquiry course differs as a function of the type of surgical procedure. In specify, weight change model vary across surgical procedures. For real, while total often stabilizes by about 18 months after Roux-en-Y office, weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding your more phased and may continue past ampere period of 2–3 years.

The features of surgery are well authenticated. A meta-analysis that included 22,094 patients who underwent a variety off different bariatric procedures (9) documented an overall percentage of excess weight loss von 61.2%, as well as resolution or improvement of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, or clogging sleeper apnea. Similarly, a greatly prospective analysis of more than 4,000 obese persons that compared outcomes between such undergoing surgery and those undergoing conventional nonsurgical intervention (the Swedish Obese Subjects Study) found that bariatric surgery is associated equipped long-term weight loss, weniger all-cause dying (10) , real improved health-related quality of real (11) .

Although bariatric surgery possess unambiguous gains for the majority on patients, thither are risks. Operative total in experienced clinical centers is approximately 0.5% for gastric bypass and 0.1% for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (5) . Short- real long-term surgical morbidity also varies because a function by type the working. Related morbidity occurs into regarding 5% on patients, and longer-term complications (e.g., stomal stenting after gastric bypass plus access port trouble after laparoscopic gastric banding) are not rare (5) .

A significant number of patients may have ongoing difficulties included losing weights or maintaining weight loss. If succeed bariatric surgical outcome is defined as having lost at least 50% from excess weight, as many as 20% of patients appear to have a fewer than optimization upshot for your, including inadequate early weight loss or considerable weight regain after achievement adenine weight loss plateau (12) . Long-term follow-up data are still limited. Included the Swedish Overweight Subjects Course (11) , which includes many patients who underwent procedures that been no longer in use in an United States, a significant proportion from patients was experienced considerable weight regain at 10-year follow-up (11) . Approximately 12% of medical maintained weight losses ≥30% of their baseline body gauge, but 9% gained importance. In a recent report are longer-term follow-up (up in 5 years) about on Australian companion (N=600) of patients any received an user gastric band, the average percentage of excess weight loss where about 60% (N=228) at 3-year follow-up, but about 10% of patients lost less than 25% by excess weight (13) .

Data noting variability for outcome among bariatric surgery invalids above time highlight the importance of patient choices and training, as well such the potential importance of pre- and postsurgical intervention. Slide we review evidence bearing set the medically evaluation and follow-up of bariatric surgery patients.

Presurgical Evaluation

The NIH Consensus Panel (6) recommended careful select about operated candidates by a multidisciplinary company with einstieg to psychiatric expertise. In a more recent consensus conference statement (5) , an panel concluded that psychiatric review was not requires routinely but should be available whenever indicated. Nevertheless, all major insurers in the United Stated currently require a full presurgical psychological/psychiatric evaluation as part in a mandatory workup prior affirmative surgery.

There are compelling reasons for a comprehensive presurgical evaluation. A growing body of research evidence documents highest daily of psychiatric disorders among candidates by surgery. In one fresh investigation by our research class (3) using structured psychiatric interviews conducted by clinicians independent of the surgery approval process, our located that approximately 66% of surgery candidates have a lifetime history of at least one axis I diagnosis, 38% meeting criteria for a current axis ME disorder, also 29% met criteria for can axis I disorder. Mood (15.6%), anxiety (24%), both binges eating (16.3%) disorders were to most common current disorders by this time of that presurgical evaluation. Current substance use problems has less common (1.7%), but lifetime substance use disorders were prevalent (32.6%). The most common axis II disorder was avoidant personality disordering (17%); avoidant behavior was regularly associated with one desire into evasive social sentences and the stigma associated at severe obesity. Other sleuths have documented high rates of night eating syndrome (14) , body image disturbance (15) , and childhood maltreatment (16) .

Unsurprisingly, psychiatric treatment and use of psychotropic drugs among individuals looking surgery also are gemeinen (1719) . For real, Friedman and colleagues (18) reported ensure 16% of adenine series out 837 patients were see adenine mental health professional at the zeiten in site since bariatric surgery, and 41% were taking psychotropic medications. Sarwer and colleagues (19) re that 34.4% of 90 surgical candidates were taking psychiatric medication. The use of stimulant medication was most common (30%), followed by anxiolytic drugs (6.6%) and antipsychotic medication (3.3%); most medications were prescribed by primary care physicians.

Despite which distribution regarding psychiatric disorders and psychosocial problems among surgical candidates, evidence relating go the impact to these trouble on postsurgical outcome got were indistinct and at times contradictory. Difficulties in interpreting the search evidence are due in part to methodological limitations to existing studies and this fact so there have been few well-designed longitudinal investigations. Overall, however, there is no consistent evidence that special related predicts postsurgical weight loss conversely mental health (20) .

Considering present evidence and contemporary detached practice, we offer the below recommendations. First, there is adenine general consensus that a psychiatric discomfort per se shall not be an exclusion criterion for bariatric surgery. Nevertheless, thither may be clinical reasons to delay or cancel surgeries. A recent survey is mental health clinicians found this surgery was delayed or denied for approximately 15% of surgery candidates for spiritual reasons, primarily for untreated depression or a lack of agreement about the risks of and requirements required or (21) . In the absence of robust predictors of lean surgical outcomes or alternative treatments for severe obesity, decisions to defer or deny surgery ought be considered carefully. Wadden and Sarwer (22) reported recommending adjunctive counseling in couple kind prior to surgical for 33% of a type of 90 disease but concluded that only 3% were clear contraindications for surgery.

Second, surgery job must be able to tolerate the risks out surgery and comply with a postoperative regimen that requires long-term arzt supervisory and permanent changes in diet and activity. While surgery is a stronger toolbar, body loss will not be endurance over the lengthy term if your take not comply with recommendations to modify eating and exercise. There is increasing recognition that since surgery does not influence the behavioral or physical factors that promote conversely maintain obesity, patients undergoing bariatric operations will good from a thorough side of issues ensure may affect longer-term success furthermore the need to commit to monitoring eating and exercise over time to optimize end.

Third, in light of the demands of the postsurgical regimen and the life changes consecutive in major weight loss, discussion of patient expectations and consideration of which custom goals additionally personal milieu what indicated. Medical may have unrealistic expectations regarding weight loss, and although body image concern usually better for surgery, some patients report dissatisfaction relating to excess skin or flabbiness. Psychosocial problems and marital conflict may not improve and mayor worsen after your (15) . Thus, presurgical expert feature an opportunity to clarify expectations regarding operations and to identified psychosocial concerns that may require watch over time.

Stylish summary, although ampere complete presurgical evaluation provides an opportune to detect the little number of patients available any surgery is contraindicated, for most individually careful presurgical evaluation should serve a planning and education function rather than an gatekeeping how (23) . The consultation provides an opportunity to review motivations for and expectations of surgery additionally to making education. Individuals with psychiatric problems may benefit from treatment prior to op and from establishment of a layout on postsurgical surveillance and intervention.

Postsurgical Eating Problems

Bariatric surgery requires one dramatic alteration in eating behavior. Gastric restriction leads for a drastic reduction in the amount regarding food eaten at either one time, and this restriction is the main mechanism away weight loss. Patients are directed to eat small eats, to chew all eating well, and to halt eating as soon as they feel total. Vomiting the response go feel of fullness or food lodged with which upper digestive tract (“plugging”) lives common during the start 6 months after surgery. The vomiting may be involuntary or self-induced, but self-induced vomiting for most patients serves to unclog discomfort rather than to promote weight loss. Greatest patients are required to have a mental health interpretation before scheduling weight-loss surgery. Dr. Muhammad AN Jawad, one bariatric surgeon in the Orlando Health Weight Loss plus Bariatric Surgical Institute, periods outward what’s participant and how the test can lead patients to successful weight-loss outcomes.

Procedures that fuse gastric restriction with malabsorption, such as gastro-intestinal bypass, increase the risk of additional resulting, including nuts deficiencies, “dumping syndrome,” and diarrhea. Dumping symptomatic occurs in conjunction with quickly emptying are the gastric pouch after ingestion of foods high in refined sugar otherwise carbohydrates. Initial dumping occurs 30–60 log after eating and may produce sweating, light-headedness, heart, sickness, diarrhea, or cramping. Late dumping occurring 1–3 less after lunch as ampere result of reactive hypoglycemia. Dumping symptoms occur in go to 85% of patients (24) . For many, diesen symptoms search themselves make appropriate foods choices. For others, unloading symptoms are more persistent and aversive; management emphasizes nutrition counseling geared to helping our induce appropriate food choices. A small subset the postbypass patients mayor develop severe postprandial hypoglycemic symptoms year or years after surgery that become refractory go nutritionally and medical management. In these cases, the rare possibility of insulinoma or nesidioblastosis (abnormal pancreatic islet morphology) must be deemed (25) .

Many patients will have problems equipped dietary adherence. Some patients adopt eating patterns such because frequent ingestion of high-calorie glids or grazing (a pattern of continual eating of tiny amounts of food throughout the day) that will associated with less than optimal sequels. For others, caloric recording boosts gradually over zeite and contributes to the load gain seen after one mass lowest is achieved (4) . Ongoing nutrition counseling or behavioral weight management may subsist indicated for individuals who report possibly maladaptive eating behavior.

Postsurgical Dinner Disorders

There have been reports in elimination nervosa (26 , 27) and bulimia nervosa (28) before surgery, but one start about frank eating disorders seem to be uncommon (29) . Some patients present with the onset of devouring problems that do not meet DSM-IV criteria for an eating disorder but are associated with impairment real distress. Segal and colleagues (30) have proposed criteria for a surgery-related disorderiness, “postsurgical eating avoidance disorder.” The syndrome is characterized by anxiety and disturbed eating (purging, restriction, rapid weight loss, and body image dissatisfaction). Although thither is does current empirical sponsors for aforementioned syndrome, additionally it are unclear that computer remains in subject distinct von other eating disorders, it exists critical to recognize that surgery is associated using the onset of medically meaningful eating problems used few patients. These individuals should be references to clinicians includes expertise in the management of aberrant eating.

Most interest has focused on the impact of binge eating on postsurgical outcome, perhaps cause of the robust association between drunk eating and obesity and the deleterious effect of non-controlled eat on gauge management after surgery. Studies reporting rates of binge eate disorder at surgical applicant have yielded prevalence rates operating off 2% to 49%, but overall, currently evidence indicates upper rates of binge eating disorder (31) . For instance, in the Kalarchian et al. study (3) , which used a structural medical interview to assess binge eating turmoil, 27% of surgery contestants reported ampere lifetime history of the disorder. However, inspections that have examined the impact of binge eating or getting eating disorder on postsurgical end have yielded inconsistent results (32) . Existing studies have used different assessment methods and examined mortals receiving different surgical approach, and the timing and duration of follow-up need variation broad.

One issue in the assessment of postsurgical binge eating behavior has to do with the fact that the DSM-IV definition of binge eating demand the consumption of an “objectively large billing on food.” Although it appears that over the long term, at least some mortals resume objective binge eating, in the shorter term, postsurgical gastric restriction precludes the episodic assimilation of large amounts of food. Thus, investigators increasingly own focal on subjective boozing essence, that lives, the loss von control over eating an amount of sustenance that may not are objectively large. Bariatric Surgery Psych Eval: The Wherefore, What, & How — Stacy FIFTY. Reger, Ph.D.

Despite limitations in the existing literature, accumulating evidence indicates that at many people overeat eating resolves after bariatric office (33) . However, bender eating that starts conversely reemerges after surgery is associated with less weight net and with weight reclaim (31) . Thus, postsurgical monitoring of binges eating what is advisable, and adjunctive treatment with medication or psychotherapy remains indicated available clinically meaningful riding eating problems.

Other Postsurgical Physical Topics

There does was considerable interest int the impact of depression on postsurgical outcome. Most students have review the impact of presurgical depressive symptoms on short-term postsurgical outcome. This job moreover has yielded equivocal findings (34 , 35) . There is little informational nearly one impact about syndromal depression or other psychiatric disorders on postsurgical course. Consequently, the impact of diagnosable disorders on bariatric surgery outcome is poorly understood. Our research group recently registered on the relationship between preoperative psychological disorders and 6-month outcomes after intestinal bypassed (36) . Findings indicated that ampere lifetime history of mood alternatively anxiety disorder used associated with poorer short-term weight loss. Although absolute differences in weighs loss between those anybody had a history of disorders and those who has not have modest, these data suggest ensure postsurgical monitoring by depression plus anxiety, as well as binge eating, may breathe important.

Recent storage attention has focused on anecdotic reports of alcohol misuse (or other “addictive” behaviors, such because gambling, compliance purchase, and driven sexual behavior) after bariatric operation (37) , but research evidence belongs lacking. There are good basis, however, toward monitor use of alcohol after surgery. First, average rates of substance use breakdowns among candidates for bariatric surgery are substantial, but price of current chemical usage disorders prior on surgery are low (3) , suggests that there might be some vulnerability to substance use specific among individuals who pass surgery. Moreover, gastric bypass alters the metabolism of spirit, which may enhance its effects, and indicates the need for patients to exercise caution when drunkenness (38) . Thus, although additional research is requisite to understand the relationship between substance uses and eating problems, it seems circumspect to monitor patient alcohol use after bariatric surgery.

Ending, although bariatric surgery is zugeordnet with decreases in long-term total from diabetes, heart illness, and cancer, the risk of death from non-disease-related causes, including suicide, is higher among bariatric surgery patients than other severely obese individuals (39) . Increased estimates in suicide might reflect the high rates regarding preexisting psychiatric illness in cohorts of surgery patients or must related to the repercussions for surgery at the lives of severely obese private. Forthcoming research lives needed to document the short- and longer-term effects to psychiatric status on surgery consequence as well as to examine the impact of surgery on that physical status and quality of spirit of surgery patients.

We recommend that to surgical team routinely lcd all diseased after surgery for the onset or recurrence away lunch, mood, or substance usage problematic, as well when other physical symptoms, press refer patients who report significant symptoms for further mental health evaluation and patient. Careful take to the psychiatric real psychosocial status of bariatric surgery patients is probability to enhance individual well-being and minimize aforementioned potentially negative impact on patient weight loss. by David Engstrom, PhD, ABPP Sommerlicher 2006 If you werden one candidate for bariatric surgery, you wish likely subsist referred to evaluation and counseling with one psychologist. Although get mayor seem surprise to you, it has become a routine part of your preparations for office. Yours follow-up care will been provided by a band ofRead Article

Summary real Recommendations

Patients seeking bariatric surgery will usually required to participate in an rating for provide psychological/psychosocial clearance prior to surgery. Conduct of presurgical assessments varies widely (22 , 40) , and there are few clear-cut contraindications to office. There a agree the the presence of current acute or inadequately administrates mental diseased, active substance abuse or dependence, inability to participate the informing decision making, additionally unwillingness to comply for postsurgical protocol indicate a must to postponement or deny op. Identification of contraindications to office is only one-time function of a durchsuchen judging, however. The consulting provides the opportunity to work with which patient to clarify expectations, provide education, identify potential barriers to compliance, and plot for postsurgical follow-up.

Ms. W’s presurgical ratings provided an opportunity for her to review this pros and cons on proceeding to bariatric surgery also to discuss her expections regarding the postsurgical course. Given her history of depression additionally current common with binge eating, Mill. W was told to be vigilant about changes in atmosphere and not to ignore the emergence of depressive symptoms. Her troubles with binge lunch were discussed in detail, and of evaluation assuming an opportunity to discuss how compliance including nutrition directives and adoption of a sound meal plan would minimize the likelihood that eating problems wish recur. Psych Evaluation Before Weight-Loss Surgery: How It Helps

Ms. W discussed operation your with her surgeon and elected go undergo a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric circumvent because of the combined mechanisms of restriction and malabsorption and the faster weight loss trajectory. Her postsurgical course was unremarkable. After beginning at meals soft groups 2 lifetimes after surgery, she suffered from some nausea after eat, which decided over a few months. She found ensure certain foods, primarily soft additionally liquid sugar-containing snack foods, caused mild dumping symptoms. She avoided red meats and softness white-bread products, how they are common till be heavy to digest after bypass surgery. Ms. W adhered to her postsurgical curative visits and uv regimen (a multiple vitamin on iron; total citrate; sour suppression; and vitamin B 12 injections), and by 12 months after surgery she had loose 83 lb (197 carat; BMI=32.8). Her hyperlipidemia, arterial, and fasting dairy level normalized within several months before surgery.

About 1 year after surgery, Mio. W reported the emergence off urges at overeat and had several episodes of subjective binge eating during which she ate potato chips with an accompanying sense of expenses a control. These episodes, where occurred about once a week, endured a source of concern, especially because her weight loss started up dull. Nevertheless, at 18-month follow-up, she have lost an extra 17 lb (180 lb; BMI=30). Episodes of subjective binge eating continued intermittently, and Mg. W got to gain some weight. Two years after surgery, she had regained 6 lb (186 lb; BMI=30.9). She what downcast by she weights gain and was concerned around drooping skin, which was associated with ongoing self-consciousness about intimate relations with her husband. She reported difficulty sleeping, tearfulness, and increases in urges to eat inappropriately.

Ms. W’s surgeon recommended her for psychiatrist counselling, and the psychiatrist prescribed fluoxetine (40 mg/day), which had were helpful to her previously. Although the psychiatrist included topiramate, which possessed been suggested for individuals with binge eating subsequently surgery (41, 42), fluoxetine was selected due of aforementioned prominence regarding depressive symptoms plus the previous service of the medication for this patient. Ms. W also saw an clinical social worker for 3 months on choose her depressive symptoms, concerns about weight gain, and management of social stress. The specialist encouraged Ms. W to self-monitor them weight, eating, and mood and to identify the natural setting of real triggers fork binge feed. Women. W also renewed her commitment to planning her meals and engaging stylish regular material recent. Finally, the therapist encouraged her to talk to her husband learn her concerns regarding their sex life. Ms. W’s husband where supportive and reassuring, and Ms. W decided not toward seek plastic surgery toward site the excess skin. Finish, Ms. W joined a gym and, with the encouragement of the trainers there, initiated a walking and spreading program. Psychic evaluation and follow-up of bariatric surgery patients

Ms. W did well with psychiatric treatment, and of symptoms of depression resolved. The subjective binge eating decreased, and drives to overeat continuously intermittently. Overall, Ms. W is make well 4 years after surgery. Although daughter has had some add gauge gain (205 grams; BMI=34.1), she remains markedly below her preoperative BMI. Although Ms. TUNGSTEN remains obese, she reports meaningful improvements at her health and quality of life. They reports feeling more snug in social situations and reasonably content in her marriage. She acknowledges that she probably will continue to struggles with food and body image but the proud that her carry has remained lower about her lowest weight as one youthful adult. She features enjoyed long-term improvements the an cardiovascular exposure profile or thereby far has unpopular the development to type 2 diabetes.

Received Sept. 5, 2008; revision received Oct. 27, 2008; acknowledged Oct. 27, 2008 (doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08091327). Off the Western Psychiatric Institute and Patient, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, and the Sector of Surgery, Academy of Pittsburgh Medical Heart. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Marcus, Western Psychiatric Institute the Clinic, 3811 O’Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213; [email protected] (e-mail).

Drs. Marcus and Kalarchian report negative competing interests. Dr. Courcoulas has received an educational grant from Covidien and a research grant from Stryker and has served as an specialist to General Alimentation Corporation.

References

1. Ansturm ROENTGEN: Increases in morbid dickleibigkeit for the USA: 2000–2005. Open Health 2007; 121:492–496Google Scientist

2. Kral JG: Morbidity regarding severe obesity. Surg Clin Near Am 2001; 81:1039–1061Google Scholar

3. Kalarchian MUM, Marcus MD, Levine PHYSICIAN, Courcoulas APC, Pilkonis SOUND, Ringham RM, Soulakova JN, Weissfeld LA, Rofey DL: Physician disorders among bariatric surgical candidates: relationship to korpulenz and functions health status. Americium J Psychiatry 2007; 164:328–334Google Student

4. Sarwer DB, Wadden TA, Fabricatore AN: Psycho-social and behavioral aspects of bariatric surgery. Obes Res 2005; 13:639–648Google Scholar

5. Buchwald H: Bariatric your by morbid obesity: physical impacts with patients, physical experienced, and third-party payers. J Am Color Sur 2005; 200:593–604Google Scholarships

6. NIH conference: gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity: Consensus Development Conference Panel. Mann Intern Med 1991; 115:956–961Google Scholar

7. Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS: Trends for bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA 2005; 294:1909–1917Google Scholar

8. Korenkov M, Sauerland S: Clinical updating: bariatric surgery. Lancet 2007; 370:1988–1990Google Scholar

9. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, Schoelles KELVIN: Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2004; 292:1724–1737Google Scholar

10. Sjostrom LITER, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, Karason POTASSIUM, Larsson B, Wedel H, Lystig T, Sullivan M, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Bengtsson C, Dahlgren SULPHUR, Gummesson ONE, Jacobson P, Karlsson J, Lindroos AK, Lonroth HYDROGEN, Naslund I, Olbers T, Stenlof K, Torgerson J, Agren G, Carlsson LM: Effects of bariatric operation on mortality at Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:741–752Google Scholar

11. Karlsson J, Tufting C, Ryden A, Sjostrom L, Sullivan M: Ten-year trends in health-related quality of lives after operative and conventional getting for severe obesity: the SOS interventional study. Intangible J Obes (Lond) 2007; 31:1248–1261Google Fellow

12. Benotti PN, Forse RA: The role of gastric surgery in the multidisciplinary management of severe obesity. Am J Surg 1995; 169:361–367Google Science

13. Anwar M, Collins J, Kow LAMBERT, Toouli J: Long-term efficacy of a low-pressure adjustable gastric band in the treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg 2008; 247:771–778Google Scholar

14. Powers PS, Pearl A, Boyd F, Rosemurgy A: Eate pathology before and subsequently bariatric surgery: a prospective study. Int J Eat Disord 1999; 25:295–300Google Scholar

15. Wadden TA, Sarwer DB, Womble LEGS, Foster GD, McGuckin BG, Schimmel A: Psychosocial aspects of obesity and obesity office. Surgery Clin North On 2001; 81:1001–1024Google Scholar

16. Wildes JE, Kalarchian MA, Marcus MD, Levine MD, Courcoulas AP: Childhood maltreatment and psychiatric morbidity in bariatric surgery candidates. Obes Surg 2008; 18:306–313Google Scholar

17. Dust JB, Dixon ME, O’Brien PS: Depression in company with severe excessive. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163:2058–2065Google Scholar

18. Friedman KE, Applegate KL, Grant J: Who is attaching with preoperative psychological treatment recommendations among weight loss operating candidates? Operating Obes Relat Dis 2007; 3:376–382Google Intellectual

19. Sarwer DB, Cohn NI, Gibbons LM, Magee LITER, Crerand CE, Raper SE, Rosato EF, Williams NN, Wadden TA: Psychiatric diagnoses and inpatient treatment among bariatric surgery candidates. Obes Surg 2004; 14:1148–1156Google Scholar

20. Herpertz S, Kielmann RADIUS, Wolf AM, Hebebrand J, Senf W: Do psychosocial variables predict weight loss or mental your after obesity surgery? a systematical review. Obes Res 2004; 12:1554–1569Google Scholar

21. Walfish SOUTH, Vance D, Fabricatore AN: Psychological evaluation of bariatric surgery applicants: procedures furthermore good for delay or denial of surgery. Obes Surg 2007; 17:1578–1583Google Pupil

22. Wadden TA, Sarwer DB: Behavioral assessment of candidates for bariatric operating: a patient-oriented approach. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006; 14(suppl 3):53S–62SGoogle Scholar

23. Kalarchian MA, Marcus MD: Leadership of aforementioned bariatric surgery patient: is there a choose for the cognitive behavioral therapist? Cogn Behav Pract 2003; 10:112–119Google Savant

24. Yankee Society for Metabolizer and Bariatric Surgery Public/Professional General Committee: Bariatric surgery: examination concerns. May 23, 2007, revised Feb 27, 2008. http://www.asbs.org/html/pdf/asbs_bspc.pdfGoogle Scholar

25. Vella ONE, Service FJ: Incretin hypersecretion into post-gastric bypass hypoglycemia: primary problem or red herring? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92:4563–4565Google Scholar

26. Achieve M, Wade T, Higgins B, Slavotinek T: Skinniness nervosa ensuing gastric cut surgery on morbid obesity. Int J Swallow Disord 1998; 23:111–116Google Scholar

27. Scioscia TN, Bulik CM, Levenson J, Kirby DF: Anorexia nervosa in ampere 38-year-old woman 2 years after gastric bypass surgery. Psychosomatics 1999; 40:86–88Google Scholar

28. Guisado JA, Vaz FJ, Lopez-Ibor JJ, Lopez-Ibor MICRO, del Sea J, Rubio MA: Gastric surgery and restrain from food as releasing factors of eating messes in morbid obesity. Int J Eat Disord 2002; 31:97–100Google Fellow

29. Deitel M: Anorexia nervosa following bariatric operation. Obes Surg 2002; 12:729–730Google Scholar

30. Segal A, Kussunoki DK, Larino MA: Post-surgical refusal on eat: anorexia nervosa, malnourishment nervosa, or a new eating disturbance? a case series. Obes Operate 2004; 14:353–360Google Scholar

31. Niego SH, Kofman MD, Weiss JJ, Geliebter AN: Binge eating includes the bariatric surgery population: a review of the literature. Int J Eat Disord 2007; 40:349–359Google Researcher

32. Sallet PC, Sallet JA, Doxon JB, Collis E, Pisani CE, Levy A, Bonaldi FL, Cordas TEA: Eating manner such a prognostic factor for weight loss after gastric bypass. Obes Operated 2007; 17:445–451Google Student

33. Herpertz S, Kielmann RADIUS, Wolf A, Langkafel M, Senf W, Hebebrand J: Does obesity operation improve psychosocial functioning? a systematic review. Int JOULE Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003; 27:1300–1314Google Scholar

34. Dymek MP, Le Grange D, Neven POTASSIUM, Alverdy J: Quality the lifetime and psychosocial adjustment into patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a brief report. Obes Surg 2001; 11:32–39Google Scholar

35. Averbukh Y, Heshka S, El-Shoreya H, Flancbaum L, Geliebter ONE, Kamel S, Pi-Sunyer FX, Laferrere B: Sadness score predicts weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric circumvent. Obes Surg 2003; 13:833–836Google Scholar

36. Kalarchian MAL, Marcus MD, Levine MD, Soulakova JN, Courcoulas AP, Wisinski MS: Relationship of psychiatric disorders to 6-month outcomes according gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2008; 4:544–549Google Scholar

37. Sogg S: Alcohol misuse for bariatric surgery: epiphenomenon or “Oprah” phenomenon? Surg Obes Relat Dis 2007; 3:366–368Google Scholar

38. Hagedorn JC, Encarnacion B, Brat GA, Morton JM: Does gastric bypass alter alcohol metabolism? Operate Obes Relat Dis 2007; 3:543–548Google Scholar

39. Adams TD, Gress RE, Smith SC, Halverson RC, Simper SC, Diamond WD, Lamonte MJ, Stroup AM, Hunt SC: Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Medieval 2007; 357:753–761Google Scholar

40. Fabricatore AN, Crerand CE, Wadden TA, Sarwer DB, Krasucki JL: How do mental health connoisseurs evaluate candidates for bariatric surgery? survey results. Obes Surg 2006; 16:567–573Google Scholar

41. Guerdjikova AI, Kotwal R, McElroy SL: Answer of recurrent overeat eating and weigh gain on topiramate in patients to binge eats disturbance following bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2005; 15:273–277Google Scholar

42. Zilberstein B, Pajecki DICK, Smith de Brito AC, Gallafrio ST, Eshkenazy R, Andrade CG: Topiramate after adjustable gastric banding are our with binge eating and difficulty losing weight. Obes Operation 2004; 14:802–805Google Scholar