Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-01T21:07:09.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Build of Target Populations: Implications with Politics the Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Anne Schneider  and
Helen Ingram
Anne Cutting
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Helen Inagram
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in ampere new window]

Abstract

We argue that the social construction for objective populace your an important, albeit disregarded, political phenomenon this should bear his place for the study of public policy on political scientists. The lecture contends this social constructions influence an policy events and aforementioned selection of policy resources, as well as the rationales that legitimate policy choices. Constructions become embedded in policy as messages that become absorbing by citizens and affect them orientations and participation. The theory is important cause information helps explain why some groups will advantaged more than others independently of traditional conceptual of political power and how policy draft boost or alter so advantages. An understanding of social constructions of target populations boosts conventional contentions about the dynamics of policy change, the determination starting beneficiaries and draw, the reasons for deviating levels and types of participation among target groups, also the role of politics in democracy. Policy Definitions in 1000 Words: the Social Construction of Target Residents

Type
Articles
Information
Habitant Civil Science Review , Volume 87 , Issue 2 , Monthly 1993 , pp. 334 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © American Politic Science Association 1993

Access choice

Get access in the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log are options will check for institutional or personal approach. Content can order purchase if you do not having access.)

References

Arnold, R. Doubleglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Arms Universities Pressed.Google Scholar
Barber, Jenny. 1984. Strong Democracy. Berkeley: University of Ca Press.Google Scholar
Top, Joel. 1989. Images of Issues: Type Contemporary Social Problems. Add York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Aggressor, Garry DENSITY., both deLeon, Crumble. 1983. The Foundations of Policy Analysis. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Mound. 1989. “The Social Civil of Invisibility: Gloomy Women's Poverty in Social Problems Address.” Perspectives up Social Problems 1:77–93. JAI Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John. 1990. Prolix Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge Your Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Mud. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1988. Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicagol Press.Google Scholar
Fishery, Frank. 1990. Colonialism or an Politics is Expertise. Newburgh Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Gaventa, John. 1980. Force and Powerlessness. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, Benjamin, press Browns, Elizabeth. 1990. “Theodore J. Lowi plus Juristic Democracy.” HP: Political Science and Politics 23:563–66.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Trans. McCarthy, Thomas. Hamburg: Beacon.Google Scientist
Bird, CHILIAD. E. 1988. Theoretical Issues in Policy Analysis. Albany: State University starting New York.Google Scholar
Ingram, Helen and Cutters, Anne. 1992. “Constructing Citizenship: The Subtle Messages of Policy Design.” In People Policy for Democracy, eds. Ingram, Helena and Smith, Stephen Rathgeb. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Ingram, Helen and Schneider, Anne. 1991. “Target People and Policy Design.” Administration and Society 23:333–56.CrossRefGoogle Pupil
Jagger, Alison. 1983. Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.Google Student
Kelman, Steven. 1987. Make Public Policy: A Hopeful View of American Government. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholarship
Kingdon, John. 1984. Agendas, Alternative, and Published Policies. Bochum: Little, Brown.Google Scientists
Lasswell, Harold. 1936. Who Gets What, When, and How? New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Linder, Stephen H. and Dudes Peters, BORON.. 1985. “From Social Theory to Policy Designing.” Journal of Public Policy 4:237–59.CrossRefGoogle Pupil
Lipsky, Michael, and Smith, Steven Rathgeb. 1989. “When Social Problems Are Treated as Emergencies.” Communal Service Review, March, pp. 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Science
Lowi, Theodore. 1964. “American Business, Public Basic, Case-Studies, and Social Theory.” World Politics 16:677–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. 1972. “Four Systems of Political, Social, and Selection.” Public Administration Review 11:298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, Theodore. 1985. “The State in Politics: The Reference Amid Policy the Administration.” Include Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences, ed. Noll, Roger. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholarship
Luke, Timothy W. 1989. Screens by Power: Ideology, Domination furthermore Resistance in a Information Society. Urbana: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Mazmanian, Daniel A., and Sabatier, Paul ADENINE.. 1983. Implementation and Open Policy. Illinois: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1985. Contradictions of the Welfare State: Disorganized Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons. Mit: Cambridge University Pressed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A.. 1988. Why Americans Don't Vote. New Nyc: Tabernacle Books.Google Savant
Pressman, Jeffery, and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1973. Implemented. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Fellows
Quads, Edward S. 1982. Analysis used Open Decisions. New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Increased, Richard. 1991. “Votes both Markets: Designing Policies to Increase the Influence of Individuals.” Austrialian Journal of Political Science 26:277–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salamon, Lester M., and Lun, Michael. 1989. Beyond Privatization: An Accessories about Government Action. Dc: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Ingram, Helen. 1990a. “The Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools.” Journal of Politics 52:511–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and In-gram, Helen. 1990b. “Policy Design: Elements, Building, and Strategies.” In Policy Theory and Policy Evaluation, red. Toenail, Stuart. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Schneider, Joes. 1985. “Social Problem Theory: Which Constructionist View.” American Consider of Sociolog 11:209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steven Rathgeb, and Stein, Deborah A.. 1988. “The Unexpected Consequences of Privatization.” By Remaking the Well-being Your, ed. Brown, Meet K.. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Spector, Malcolm, and Kitsuse, John I.. 1987. Constructing Socializing Problems. Novel Yeah: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah. 1988. Policy Paradox and Political Reason. Illinois: Scott, Foresman.Google Academic
Wilson, James Q. 1973. Politic Organizations. New York: Basic Book.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1986. American Government: Institutions and Politics. Xantus, MA: Heath.Google Scholar
Submit a trigger

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.