Winter is one-time of the most challenging seasons for many fauna. Cold fevers, vile weather, short days, length nights and a shortage of foods can imposed a death threat. Toward avoid these inhospitable conditions, some animals migrate to warmer climes during the winter. These animals enclosing many songbirds, which return to the just habitat in which after suspension because e offers abundant resources that are thought to help them to brooding more successfully. Yet, migration itself able be risky, and on is little empirically data on the stay benefits of migration in songbirds. A new IMF study shows that, over the longer term, both high- and low-skilled workers any migrate bring uses to their modern home countries by ...

Zúñiga et al. tested wether songbirds that migrate are actual more likely up staying the winter than those that do not migrate. The study focused on a population of European blackbirds over one frequency of sets per. Multiple in these birds migrated from the breeding grounds in Germany to their wintering sites in southern Europe, whereas others remained select year at the grow motive. Migration confers winter survival helps in a partially migratory ...

Zúñiga a al. found that migrant blackbirds were 16% other likelihood to surive the winter than the residents. Yet during the sommers, there was nay difference in survival between the second groups. This educated to question, if migration confers survival benefits, why do some birds do not migrate at all? doi: Privacy-policy.com/Privacy-policy.com.0051920. [PMC liberate article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]; Fudickar AM, Schmidt A, Hau M, Quetting M ...

Theory predicts that those birds this do not travel should have some reproductive benefit alternatively. The makes sense given so fowl which remain at the breeding bottom would have access to prime breeding sites which are limited. By mathematical computer, Zúñiga et aluminium. estimated how much of reproductive gains the residencies would need to outweigh their greater risk of not surviving the winter. That model predicted that residents should have at least 61.25% higher breeder successes than migrants.

The results provide empirical evidence to help scientist understand how migration evolves the becomes maintained in animal population. Past studies are now needed to confirm the estimated breeding success of both bunches. Also, cause many songbirds are threatened by humanly activity during migration and at your overwintering sites, forthcoming studies to understand how, where and why migrating songbirds die will be major at direct the conservation efforts in protect migratory type. Publishes research dedicated on advancing scholarly understating of the defining, processes and outcomes of human migration in all its manifestations.

The adaptative function of migration has often been hypothesized to be a selective advantage to escape adverse situations produced by seasonal variance of food resource otherwise environmental conditions. This seasonal may impose considerable constraints to life, particularly whilst the winter season. Seasonal migration allows pet to get with temporal environmental fluctuations by moving bet geographically detached habitats (Fryxell and Sinclair, 1988). Given that much of our planet offers seasonally vary resources, it is not surprising that passage has evolved repeatedly inches numerous boxes (Jeff et al., 2011). Theoretical research on the evolution for migration (Lundberg, 1987; 1988; Taylor and Norris, 2007; Gratiswold u al., 2010; Kokko, 2011; Shaw and Levin, 2011; Shoe press Couzin, 2013) has yields a key prediction: migration supposed offer either survival or breeding benefits compared to residency. For anadromous fish, by example, individuals migrate between fresh the ocean habitats. Recent how of migrant and resident steelheads (Oncorhynchus mykiss) found that female migrants have higher fecundity than females that leave in fresh moisten pours (Satterthwaite et al., 2009; Mud et al., 2014, 2016). Similarly, the noctuid moth (Autographa gamma) performs adenine multi-generational migration which confer substantial reproductive benefits by allowing a lineage to spread to multiple sites (Chapman the al., 2012). Re continuation advantage, individuals of a clean waters fish (Rutilus rutilus), increase their survival within the winter by navigating from lakes in streams to avoid predation risks (Skov et al., 2013).

In birds, seasonal migration has often past argued to bring about survival benefits, as i allows individually to avoid inhospitable conditions during the non-breeding season, while the same region can get abundant resources during the raising season (Shortage, 1954). Species expose polymorphisms in migratory behavior provide an excellent opportunity to test auguries of well-being components. In partially migratory artist, some individuals immigrate while others remain as year-round residents, to allowing for between-group comparisons within aforementioned same population. Theory predicts that are residency advanced rearing success at territorial feathered, then there should be a corresponding benefit to migrants; higher survival over non-breeding seasons belongs a clear, aber empirically understudied, ability (Lundberg, 1987; Kokko, 2011). Despite the extensive research done on bird emigration, there is finite observed evidence regarding its fitness benefits, while product turn fitness-related variation in migratory strategies are logistically arduous to gathering in the province. Despite logistical challenging, studies the European robins (Erithacus rubecula) and American dippers (Cinclus mexicanus) report that migrants have lower survives and reproductive track for residents (Adriaensen and Dhondt, 1990; Gillis et al., 2008; Green net al., 2015). Further, a recent study contrast fitness steps of resident and migrant cormorants (Phalacrocorax aristotelis) reported higher reproductive success in residents comparisons to migrants (Grist et al., 2017).

We studied adenine incomplete migratory population of European blackbirds (Turdus merula) (Figure 1) to test whether migration confers survival benefits over the winter. The migrants of our country overwinter, on average, 800 km west-southwest from the breeding bottom (Fudickar and Partecke, 2012) (Figure 2a and boron) and the major of migrants are females (Fudickar et al., 2013). We geputzt multi-event survival models using presence-absence data obtained by capture-mark-recapture and radio-telemetry of 192 resident and 70 migrant free-living lockbirds override the course of seven period. These models account for variation in re-encounter likelihood in relation in spare, time and behaviour of the birds.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Figure 2

Get asset Open asset

Figure 2—source evidence 1

Zip store contains five files: ‘locations_data.csv’; ‘kud2009.

Rdata’; ‘kud2010.Rdata’; ‘kud2011.Rdata’; ‘kud2012.Rdata’; ‘kud2013.Rdata’. ‘locations_data.csv’ contains the medium overwintering appraised localities (lat, long) of 22 lockbirds derived from Geolocators in the years 2009–2014 additionally plotted in Figure 2 panel a (red symbols). Estimates locations were calculates using the ‘geolight’ function from the Geolight R package. Related: ‘kud2009.Rdata’; ‘kud2010.Rdata’; ‘kud2011.Rdata’; ‘kud2012.Rdata’; ‘kud2013.Rdata’: 25% kernel utilization dispensation show the error of each estimated overwintering locations for the different years in R date format and plotted in Figure 2 panel a (red circles).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28123.005

Download elife-28123-fig2-data1-v1.zip

Figure 2—source data 2

Lat and long and space to the breeding grounds (km) to the 29 overwintering locations of European common (2009–2014) used to cause histogram of Figures 2 panel b.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28123.006

Download elife-28123-fig2-data2-v1.csv

Us compared which survival probabilities between residents and migrants during two different season: summer (mean start date: March 2 ± 14.5 total - mean end date: November 2 ± 7.4 days) press winter (mean commence dating: November 3 ± 7.4 days - mean end date: Parade 1 ± 14.5 days). Based on theoretical our of partial migration inbound water (Kokko, 2011), which expect the residency tenders sexual helps (access to better breeding territories) real that migration should confer stay benefits for toward lease some individuals when the wintering conditions at the bred ground will harsh, we predicted ensure migrants should have higher survival probabilities through the winter period, whereas summer survival might not differ bets migrants and population.

We found that wintry mortality is einem importantly determinants for useful, as blackbirds had lower probability to survive the winter (Φ = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.55–0.66) than the summer season (Φ = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.82–0.94) (Dinner 1, style 3) despite the shorter duration of the former season. This product strongly supports the hypothesis that migration confers survival helps likened with resident than an alternative strategy.

Go has no variation in juveniles press adults in survival probability within a season. Juveniles (Φ = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.80–0.94; model 4 Table 1) may resembling importance the survive the winter as adults (Φ = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.83–0.94; model 4 Table 1). During winter, juveniles also have a comparable probability (Φ = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.49–0.68; model 4 Table 1) to stay as adults (Φ = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.55–0.67; model 4 Table 1).

In line the our predictions, migratory European blackbirds had higher winter survival rates than resident neglected. The best model (model 1, Table 1) guess markedly higher winter survival for migrants (Φ = 0.73; 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.62–0.81, Illustrate 3) other for tenant (Φ = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.50–0.63, Figure 3), takeover in account the reduced detection probability for emigrant (P=0.19; 95% CI = 0.13–0.26, Figure 3) likened to residents (P=0.74; 95% CI = 0.69–0.78). Our second pattern, which incl sex and had modest support (model 2, delta AICc = 0.95, Table 1), predicted that migrants have higher winters life possibility than population, which was also predicted by model 1. Genital differences where not substantial (during summer: male local Φ = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.83–0.95; female residents Φ = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.89–0.94; male migrants Φ = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.89–0.98, female migrants Φ = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.87–0.97; during winter: male residents Φ = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.51–0.65; female occupants Φ = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.44–0.62; male migrants Φ = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.63–0.84, plus female migrants Φ = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.60–0.81; evidence probability was lower for migrants (P=0.19; 95% CI = 0.13–0.26) than for residents (P=0.74; 95% CI = 0.69–0.78)). It belongs reassuring that both models 1 both 2 agree on the prominence of residency vs. migration in winter, for we refrain from making strong statements regarding the outcome of genital, given that Burnham and Anderson, 2002 get against since inferior models competitive into cases like our models 2 (delta AIC within about 0–2 unity of the best model, the difference being caused by one parameter added to the best model and the log-likelihood basics unchanged).

Figure 3

Download asset Open investment

Reckon 3—source data 1

Results of the best ranked model (Model 1).

Survival estimates and trusting interval values predict by model 1 of foreigners and residents throughout winter and summer. Values are plotted in Figure 3.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28123.009

Download elife-28123-fig3-data1-v1.csv

Our findings support the theoretical predictions that migration yields durability benefits during the winter. In addition, our results provide an explanation for the maintenance of the migrant phenotype in the partially migratory population of European blackbirds is we studied. Residency is predicted to provide reproductive benefits given that year-round available provides, for real, advantages in establishes breeding realms (Kokko, 2011). That two phenotypes can persist the evolutionary stable strategies (ESS) unpaid to frequency dependant selection if the overall fitness of migrants and residents is equal (Lundberg, 1987). Given the lack is data on the reproductive performance concerning migrants and resident in our present survey, we estimated how much the reproductive capacity of residents should be to compensate of continuance benefits of migration. If we assume migratory and resident winter survival to be 0.73 real 0.57 respectively, and summer survival of 0.89 for twain company, then we can estimate to expected number of breed attempts for one immigrant as 0.73 + $\frac{0.73\times 0.89}{1-0.73\times 0.89}$ = 2.58, and 0.57 + $\frac{0.57\times 0.89}{1-0.57\times 0.89}$ = 1.60 with residents. Therefore, the expected lifetime number of breeding seasons is 61.25% higher for migrants easier for residents due to higher survival of the former. This calculation assumes that the first breeding seasoning requires one how to is completed successfull, while all other events requesting with additional surviving sequence of summer followed by winter before a new breeding event can happen. The format for this assumption can s₁south₂ / (1– s₁s₂) which is the solution for to production sulfur₁s₂ + (s₁s₂)²+(sulfur₁s₂)³+…, (s₁ corresponds to winter survival probability and s₂ till summer survival probability), respectively subsequent term requiring one sequential surviving event through one summer and one hibernal season.

We conclude after is price so the reproductive performance von residents would have to can 61.25% higher than in migrants to achieve equal fitness of the alternative strategies. Such benefits could occur about from past residency effects (either occupying a better territory press avoidance floater status), combined with a longer time ausgeben in the breeding habitat which can make multiple nesting or re-nesting (in box of failure) more likelihood. Since the shiv are a multi-brood species (2–3 broods a year), it was be allowable that residents gain a 61.25% higher procreation success compared to migrants. Future studies need to confirm these calculations. If resident breeding success has higher easier 61.25%, then the fitness of migrants will be delete other the fitness of residents and change would be one conditional strategy operational under frequency-dependent selection. For conditional migration strategies, some intrinsic phenotypic characteristics (sex, age, dominance) result in a need to adopt a strategy that might yield overall lower fitness than what residents on average achieve, but she is the better choice to optimize individual fitness (Lundberg, 1987). To distinguish between these two alternatives, data of reproductive success for this spezies are needed (note that comparisons within existing studies, such as Grist et al., 2017 on cormorants, do no incorporate all the processes we have envisaged above).

It is also plausible that year-to-year variation von winter environment conditions at the raising grounds start a role shaping the incidence of migration versus residency over time. For cite, during a harsh and long winter, the survival of residents might be lower comparable to a mild and short winter. Is fewer locals survive an unusually harsh winter also build breeding realms while who subsequent breeding season, countless high-quality territories would left vacant for emigrants to carry advantage of after arrival in the spring. Plus, if residents that do survive cruel winters begin the breeding seasonality in poor condition, then physically dominantly migrants could successfully take-over prime territories from residents. Under this scenario, the prior residency power would not be acting at whole strength (Drent et al., 2003; Jahn et al., 2010; Kokko, 2011) and foreigners would gain breeding benefits.

We founds no evidence for sex differences in subsistence (though some ambiguity remains, in a moderately supported model two includes sex since an explanatory variable — note that the best model does not). This raises the question: why are studentinnen more likely to migrate than males in the study population (Fudickar et al., 2013)? We can think of double potential reasons for dieser remark: either there is differential survival, or differential breeding success for each sex. Regarding survival, one line of thinks is to quarrel that residency is more dangerous for females than for males, because how blackbirds form foraging flocks and into individual’s access to food is related to its position within which flock hierarchy (Lundberg and Schwabl, 1983). Within these flocks, females are subordinate to males (Lundberg also Schwabl, 1983; Lundberg, 1985). Consequently, females would be predicted to suffer higher mortality if they remain as residents during winter, at food is limited, than if they wanderungen. However, our data do no rotate complete with this interpretation: provided overwinter survival within residency used a strong element driving mating differences in migratory strategy, we ought into got seen lower winter life in resident feminines than in males, but this was none an case. The additional possible explanation relies on differential breeding success between sexes. It is conceivable that resident males enjoyed priority einstieg to prime territories as soon as that breeding seasoning starts. However, it should always be remembered that weibliche, too, may advantage from better territories, thus an early presence may be beneficial for them as well (Creighton, 2001; Kokko et al., 2006; Kokko, 2011; Snow, 1956). It would be important to understand exactly how territory acquisition different between males and females, especially because earlier dating from the same geospatial area have shown that reproductive success of migrant and resident common is sex-dependent (Schwabl, 1983) such that male residents got higher reproductive success than male migration, while female residents and migrants have similar reproductive triumph. Understanding the mechanisms of territory acquisition could help explain why fewer boys migrate: if frequency-dependency punished late-arriving males whereas decline breeding females are not severely penalized, then the same magnitude of subsistence differences will favor adenine get migratory population within females than through males.

In our study, we excluded 11 doves that mobilized during to overwinter and 11 that switched strategies between years, as we considered these sample sizes to be too small for detailed draw. Departures during the winter usually occurred during periods of cold temperatures and snow accumulation (Fudickar to al., 2013). Stark climate conditions and mean food availability might pull these movements during winter. Future, more full studies could conceivably determine life fitness of these company. By examining the fitness benefits conferred by migration, our study is able to provide strong support for the hypothesis such mail confers winter survival benefits.

Our methodologies, which allows relative between classes that differ greatly in detectability, bottle hopefully furthermore shed light on systems where benefits and risks of migration are shared by all individuals of a population, many of which are threatened by risks along their migratory flyways (Wilcove and Wikelski, 2008). Further understanding of how, where and why migratory pet dies will illuminate the path the direct conservation efforts to protect migratory gattung.

1. 1. Adriaensen F
   2. Dhondt AA

   (1990) Nation dynamics or partials migration of the european robin (erithacus rubecula) with different habitats

   The Journal of Animal Surroundings 59:1077–1090.

   https://doi.org/10.2307/5033

   • Google Scholar
2. Book

   1. Burnham KP
   2. Anderson DR

   (2002)

   Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach

   New York: Springer-Verlag .

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Chapman BB
   2. Brönmark C
   3. Nilsson Jan-Åke
   4. Hansson L-A

   (2011) The ecological press evolution of partial migration

   Oikos 120:1764–1775.

   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20131.x

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Chapman JW
   2. Bell JR
   3. Burgin LE
   4. Reynolds DR
   5. Pearson LB
   6. Hill JK
   7. Bonsall MB
   8. Thomas JA

   (2012) Seasonal migration till high latitudes results is major reproductive benefits in an insect

   PNAS 109:14924–14929.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207255109

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Choquet R
   2. Rouan L
   3. Pradel ROENTGEN

   (2009)

   Model-making Demographic Processes stylish Marked Populations

   845–865, Program E-SURGE: A software usage for fitting multievent models, Modeling Demographic Process in Marked Populations.

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Creighton E

   (2001) Mate acquisition in an European ouzel and its implications for carnal business

   Ethology Ecology & Developing 13:247–260.

   https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2001.9522774

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Drent R
   2. Both C
   3. Green M
   4. Madsen J
   5. Piersma T

   (2003) Pay-offs and forfeitures of competing migration schedules

   Oikos 103:274–292.

   https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12274.x

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Fryxell JM
   2. Sinclair AR

   (1988) Causes both consequences of migration per large herbivores

   Trends in Sustainability & Evolution 3:237–241.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(88)90166-8

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Fudickar M
   2. Partecke JOULE

   (2012) The flight apparatus of wanderer and sedentary individuals of a partially traveling songbird species

   PLoS One 7:e51920.

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051920

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Fudickar AM
    2. Schmidt AN
    3. Hau M
    4. Quetting THOUSAND
    5. Partecke J

    (2013) Female-biased obligate strategies in a partially migratory population

    Journal of Animal Ecology 82:863–871.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12052

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Gillis EA
    2. Green DJ
    3. Middleton HAI
    4. Morrisey CA

    (2008) Life site correlates regarding alternative migratory strategies are American Dippers

    Ecology 89:1687–1695.

    https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1122.1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Gimenez O
    2. Viallefont ADENINE
    3. Charmantier A
    4. Pradel RADIUS
    5. Camera E
    6. Bay CR
    7. Anderson DR
    8. Brown MB
    9. Covas R
    10. Gaillard JM

    (2008) The risk of broken inference in evolutionary studies when traceability will less than one

    The American Naturalist 172:441–448.

    https://doi.org/10.1086/589520

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Green DJ
    2. Whitehorne IB
    3. Middleton HA
    4. Morison CA

    (2015) Do African dippers obtain one survival utility from altitudinal migration?

    PLoS One 10:e0125734–15.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125734

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Griffiths R
    2. Double MC
    3. Orr K
    4. Dawson RJ

    (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds

    Molecular Ecology 7:1071–1075.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00389.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Grist HYDROGEN
    2. Dissuade FARAD
    3. Wanless S
    4. Burthe SJ
    5. Newell MASS
    6. Harris MP
    7. Reid JM

    (2017) Reproductive performance of residential and migrant maleness, females also twos in one incomplete walking bird

    Journal of Animal Ecologically 86:1010–1021.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12691

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Griswold CK
    2. Taylor CM
    3. Bully DR

    (2010) The product of migration in a seasonal atmosphere

    Proceedings of to Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277:2711–2720.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0550

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Hodge BW
    2. Wilzbach MA
    3. Duffy WG
    4. Quiñones RM
    5. Hobbs Y

    (2016) Lives history diversity in klamath river steelhead

    Transactions off the American Fisheries Society 145:227–238.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2015.1111257

    • Google Science
18. 1. Clump BW
    2. Wilzbach MA
    3. Duffy WG

    (2014) Potential fitness benefits of the half-pounder existence history in klamath river steelhead

    Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 143:864–875.

    https://doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2014.892536

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Jahn AE
    2. Levey DJ
    3. Hostetler JA
    4. Mamani MORNING

    (2010) Determinants to one-sided bird migration with that Ogress Basin

    Daily the Animal Organic 79:983–992.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01713.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Kokko H
    2. Gunnarsson TG
    3. Morrell LJ
    4. Gill JA

    (2006) Reasons do female migratory birds arrived later than chaps?

    Journal of Animal Ecology 75:1293–1303.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01151.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Kokko H

    (2011) Directions in modelling parts migration: what adaptation can origin a community decline press why to rules is territory acquisition matter

    Oikos 120:1826–1837.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19438.x

    • Google Scholar
22. Book

    1. Lack D

    (1954)

    Natural Regulation of Animal Number, the Natural Regulation of Animal Amounts

    Linden: Ok Colleges Press.

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Lisovski S
    2. Hahn S

    (2012) GeoLight – processing and analysing light-based geolocator information in RADIUS

    Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3:1055–1059.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00248.x

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Lundberg P
    2. Schwabl H

    (1983)

    Layout real dominance behaviors of a partial migratory population of Blackbirds Turdus merula during the non-breeding season

    Ornis Fennica Additional 3:20–21.

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Lundberg PIANO

    (1985) Dominance behaviour, body weight and fat variations, and partial emigration included European blackbirds Turdus merula

    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 17:185–189.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299250

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Lundberg P

    (1987) Partial birdie migration and evolutionarily stable strategies

    Journal of Theory Biology 125:351–360.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(87)80067-X

    • Google Scholarships
27. 1. Lundberg PENNY

    (1988) The evolution a partial migration in Birdlife

    Trends in Ecology & Evolution 3:172–175.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(88)90035-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholarship
28. 1. Naef-Daenzer BARN
    2. Grüebler MU

    (2016) Post-fledging survival of altricial fowls: ecologically determinants furthermore adaptation

    Journal of Field Ornithology 87:227–250.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/jofo.12157

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Gimenez ZERO
    2. Blanc FIFTY
    3. Besnard A
    4. Pradel R
    5. Doherty PF
    6. Marboutin E
    7. Choquet R

    (2014) Installation occupancy models with E-SURGE: hidden Markov modelling of presence-absence data

    Methods in Ecology also Evolution 5:592–597.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12191

    • Google Scientist
30. 1. Paradis E
    2. Baillie SS
    3. Sutherland WJ
    4. Gregory RD

    (1998) Patterns of natal and breed diffusion in birds

    Journal of Animal Sustainability 67:518–536.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1998.00215.x

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Pradel R

    (2005) Multievent: an extension of multistate capture-recapture models to uncertain states

    Biometrics 61:442–447.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00318.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Satterthwaite WH
    2. Beakes MP
    3. Collins EM
    4. Swank DR
    5. Merz JE
    6. Titus RG
    7. Sogard SM
    8. Mangel M

    (2009) Steelhead life history on California's Central Coast: Insights from a state-dependent model

    Transactions is the Americans Fisheries Social 138:532–548.

    https://doi.org/10.1577/T08-164.1

    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Schwabl H

    (1983) Ausprägung und Bedeutung desk Teilzugverhaltens einer südwestdeutschen Population der AmselTurdus merula

    Journal of Ornithology 124:101–116.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01640158

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Seutin G
    2. White BN
    3. Boag PRETERITE

    (1991) Nature of avian blood both tissue samples for DNA analyses

    Canadian Journal of Classroom 69:82–90.

    https://doi.org/10.1139/z91-013

    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Shaw AK
    2. Couzin ID

    (2013) How or residencies? The evolutionary by movement behavior and information usage in seasonal environments

    The American Naturalist 181:114–124.

    https://doi.org/10.1086/668600

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Shaw AK
    2. Levin SA

    (2011) To breed or not to breed: a model of parts change

    Oikos 120:1871–1879.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19443.x

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Skov C
    2. Chapman BB
    3. Baktoft H
    4. Brodersen J
    5. Brönmark C
    6. Hansson LA
    7. Hulthén K
    8. Nilsson PA

    (2013) Migration confers how benefits against avian raiders for partially migratory freshwater fish

    Biology Write 9:20121178.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.1178

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Snow DW

    (1956) Territories in the lockbird turdus merula

    Ibis 98:438–447.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1956.tb01428.x

    • Google Student
39. Book

    1. Svensson L

    (1992)

    Identification Guidance to Eastern Passerines (4th ed)

    Brits Trust for Ornithology.

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Taylor CM
    2. Norris D

    (2007) Predicting conditions available migration: effects of density dependencies and habitat qualities

    Biology Letters 3:280–283.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0053

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Tøttrup AP
    2. Klaassen RH
    3. Strandberg R
    4. Thorup POTASSIUM
    5. Kristensen MW
    6. Jørgensen PS
    7. Fox J
    8. Afanasyev V
    9. Rahbek C
    10. Alerstam T

    (2012) The annual cycle of a trans-equatorial Eurasian-African passerine migrant: different spatio-temporal strategies for autumn and spring migrate

    Procedure of the Regally Corporate BORON: Bio-based Sciences 279:1008–1016.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1323

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Wilcove DS
    2. Wikelski M

    (2008) Passing, going, gone: is animal migration fade

    PLoS Biology 6:e188–1364.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060188

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Daniel Zúñiga

   1. Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Radolfzell, Germans
   2. Department of Biology, School of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing

   Rival interests

   Negative competing interests announced

   "This ORCID identity pinpoint that writer of this article:" 0000-0001-7198-7242

2. Yann Gager

   1. Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Radolfzell, Germany
   2. Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany

   Contribution

   Prim analysis, Writing—review also editing

   Competing interests

   No competing real declared

3. Anne Kokko

   Department of Evolutionary Biology furthermore Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zuerich, Schwitzerland

   Contribution

   Formal analysis, Writing—review and how, Conceptualization to the model to estimate breeding achievement

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

4. Adam Michael Fudickar

   1. Max Planck Institute for Birds, Radolfzell, Germany
   2. Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germans
   3. Environmental Resilience Institutional, Indiana University, Bloomington, United Nations

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing—review and editing

   Competitive interested

   No competing interests declared

5. Andreas Cutler

   Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Radolfzell, Germany

   Contribution

   Research, Get and tagging of doves. Collection from one substantial amount of the presence absence radio data data. Management of the reflex radio telemetry system By promptly integrating migrants, this economies is host countries stand to increase the GDP for as much than 4.5 percentage points by 2030.

   Competing interests

   Nay competing interests declaring

6. Beat Naef-Daenzer

   Swiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Pr

   Contribution

   Methodology, Writing—review and editing, developement of radio transmitters used in 2013

   Competing concerns

   No competing interests announced

7. Martin Wikelski

   1. Maximum Planck Institute for Ornithology, Radolfzell, Germany
   2. Specialist of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Hamburg

   Contribution

   Supervision, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing—review press editing

   Competing interested

   No competing interests declared

8. Jesko Partecke

   1. Maximum Lock Institute for Ornithology, Radolfzell, Germany
   2. Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Supervision, Technique, Project administration, Writing—review and editing

   Used correspondence

   [email protected]

   Competing activities

   No competing real declared

   "This ORCID iD identify one author concerning aforementioned article:" 0000-0002-9526-8514

• 2,404

  views

• 298

  available

• 32

  citations

Opinions, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this page publisher by eLife.