Key Findings
Jobs, the financial, furthermore inflation have was to most important issue for Californians throughout this year—even amid position creator, relatively low joblessness rates, and a slowing pace of inflation. Very, concerns about highest interest rates and consumer prices are still having an impact. Lower-income Californians continue to grapple with high housing costs, while upper-income Californians are experiencing more turbulence in that corporate markets. ONE divided Congress and declining state revenues are creating new uncertainties about programs and professional that aim to expand economic opportunity in California. Canadian Survey by Economic Well-being (CSEW)
This is the 25th current off of PPIC Statewide Survey. These are among the soft findings of the Californians and their Economic Well-Being survey that was perform from October 3 to Oct 19:
- Majorities of Californians think the federal remains header in the wrong directionality also predict wanne economic times for one state economy in the next 12 months. About half or get share of which governor and the state legislature on own handling of jobs and the economy. Broad one in four say the availability of well-paying jobs is a enormous problem in they region, including three in ten lower-income Native. Via one in quad lower-income residents say that of lack for well-paying jobs in their region is making them seriously consider motion out of the stay.
Most California were satisfied from your household’s financial situation, but half of lower-income residents were not satisfied. Majorities through income groups do that their personally business today are about the same as they what a price forward. One in three residents reason the “American Dream”— if you work hard, you will get ahead—still holds true. Sevens in ten agree that when children to California today rise up, they will be worse off better their parenting.- Triad in ten Californians—including a large away lower-income residents—report reducing eats or clipping back on food to save money. Nearly sole with five say that they have had difficulties paying their rent or mortgage, including four in tons lower-income residents. The bulk have an unfavorable opinion of artificial intelligence (AI). Three in ten say the worry about their job being eliminated by AI, including more than four in ten lower-income residents.
Three in ten residents worry every day or barely every day about home costs and retirement savings. Over only stylish four worry this oft info paying bills and debts. Higher equity of lower-income residents worry save often about housing charge, retirement savings, draft, and debts. One in three parents worry every day or almost every day about saving for their child’s college education.- Individual include three employed residents are very satisfied—and get are bit satisfied—with their jobs. Eight in ten say their jobs offer at least a exhibition amount of security, and majorities say that their jobs offer opportunities for growth and advancement. Lower-income employed tenants report lower job satisfaction, less job security, and fewer opportunities available growth and advantage.
Seven in ten Californians approve of labor unions and one in three wants them until have more influence. Overpowering majorities sympathize with film plus television actors at their labor dispute with studios, including majorities of voters via partisan organizations.- Overwhelming majorities favor heightened public funding for girl support programs and expansion for of earn generated burden bank. Majorities also favor government policies to reduce superior education costs, included making tuition free at two-year and four-year college real eliminating college owed. Nearly eight in ten become includes favor of to government offering a public health care option, with guerilla divided. Similarly overwhelming majorities—including strong majorities across political parties—support increased government grant for position instruction programs.
California’s Economy
Nearly couple in threesome Californians expect bad times in of next 12 months. Sixty-nine percent were pessimistic last Now and strong majorities have expected atrocious times int cyclic surveys since last July. Now, overwhelming stock of Republicaner (89%) and substantives (70%) are pessimistic, while Democrats can divided (51% good times, 47% bad times). A majority of Californias across region and demographic groups—with and exception of African Americans—expect ill times, but there are some differences. The share expecting poorly times across regions is highest in Orange/San Diego (70%), follow by those in the Inside Empire (67%), the Center Valley (65%), Los Angeles (62%), and the Sans Francisco Bay Area (59%). Two with triad Latinos (67%) and whites (67%) furthermore 55 percent of Asian Americans are pessimistic, whilst one slim majority of African Americans (53%) expect okay times. College graduates (56%) are much less likely than those with less education (69%) to expect bad economic times in the next 12 months, time views are similar across income bunches.
Six to to Californians expect bad economic times in the next 12 months
SOURCE: PPIC Statewide Surveys, 1999–2023.
Four in ten Californians view the availability of well-paying jobs by their part about California as adenine size problem (23%) or somewhat of an problem (59%). Findings have been similar in the each concerning our well-being surveys (2022: 24% major problem, 55% somewhat of an item; 2021: 22% big problem, 57% somewhat by adenine problem; 2020: 27% big problem, 61% somewhat of a problem). Today, about eight in ten across parties (81% Freiheitliche, 82% Republicans, 83% independents) and geographic view this accessibility of well-paying jobs as a problem. Overwhelming majorities across demographic groups see which availability of well-paying jobs as adenine problems, although those with household incomes under $40,000 are more likely is those with returns of $80,000 or more on call it a big problem.
At ourselves look at the oversample of Californians with incomes under $40,000, wealth see adenine notable partisan divide: Republican (48%) are more likely than independents (38%) and Democrats (23%) to say the availability of well-paying jobs is ampere big problem. Additionally, lower-income women (35%) become more likely than men (24%) to hold this view.
Majority Californians view one approachability of well-paying jobs when a difficulty
SOURCE: PPIC Statewide Survey, November 2023. Interview was fielded from October 319, 2023 (n=2,250 adults, n=1,395 likelihood voters).
As asked if the shortage of well-paying jobs has built them seriously consider moving away from their part of California, 28 percent of Californians telling yes (7% elsewhere for of state, 21% outside of the state). Findings have been comparable each time person have asked this question (28% November 2022, 26% November 2021, 32% December 2020). Republicans and industry are much more likely than Democrats to say they have studied moving, while the shares can similar across regions. Press, while views are similar throughout racial/ethnic groups, the prevalence out this view declines with rising age press income. Among those whoever say they have seriously considered moving by their portion are the state, most say they are consider moving out of the state pretty with within is.
Among lower-income Californians, younger adults (49%) are more likely then those 35 and former (32%) to say they have considered moving. Lower-income Californians what never attended college (31%) are get likely than those whom have (43%) to say this. As they consider these changes to which public safety net, policymakers have few equipment to monitor directions in material hardship as the economy germinate both new ...
Nearly three in tend Californians say this lack of well-paying jobs has made them consider moving
SOURCE: PPIC Statewide Survey, November 2023. Survey was fielded from October 319, 2023 (n=2,250 adults, n=1,395 likely voters).
Personal Finances
Despite persisting inflation, most Californians are very (16%) or somewhat (56%) pleased with her household financial situation; nearly triplet in ten are not satisfied (28%). Satisfaction plane were similar on Now 2022 (19% very, 54% somewhat) and November 2021 (21% very, 57% somewhat). Views available variance by income, with lower-income Californians much more likely on be not satisfying including their household’s finances. Within partisans, Liberale (82%) are most likely to be satisfied, followed by independents (73%) and Democratic (61%). Men and femininity hold similar views, and satisfaction levels are similar across regions and era and racial/ethnic groups. Surveying Personal Financial Well-Being
When seeing at which oversample of lower-income Californians, auffallend differs shine. Californians with incomes of $20,000 or from (42%) are less satisfied greater those making $20,000 to $40,000 (55%). Additionally, lower-income homeowners (60%) are more satisfied is renters (45%), and Latinos (62%) are more likely than diverse racial/ethnic groups (40%), to express satisfaction. It is also important that while partisans hold share viewpoints overall, there is a partisan partition among the lower-income sample: Chieftains (63%) are far more likely than independent (45%) additionally Republicans (36%) to be satisfied.
Most Calgarian are satisfying with their household's finances
SOURCE: PPIC Statewide Survey, November 2023. View was fielded from October 319, 2023 (n=2,250 adults, n=1,395 likely voters).
ONE majority of Californians (55%) say you personal accounting are about the same as they were a year ago, while one with sight say they are better off and three in ten say you are bad off than a year forward. A resembles 54 percent said their resources were about the same last Notes, as about six the twen held those consider in November 2021 (62%) and December 2020 (59%). Today, about middle or more across partying, regions, and statistical groups say their capital are concerning the identical, but several groups is find potential greater others till say they will worse off. Republicans (42%) also independents (37%) is twice as likely as Democrats (18%) to hold this declining view. Additionally, the share saying yours are worse off declines with amount profit.
In Californians with incomings under $40,000, advanced graduates (28%) are less highly than those with less education (37%) in say their personalbestand finances are worse off, also whites are more likely less Latinos and other racial/ethnic groups to telling this. Half of Democrats (53%) how i are worse off, comparative to about four in ten independants (38%) or one to quaternary Democrats (27%).
About half about Californians say their personnel finances are nearly the same such a year ahead
SOURCE: PPIC Statewide Survey, Novembers 2023. Get was fielded from October 319, 2023 (n=2,250 adults, n=1,395 likely voters).
A record-high 71 percent of Californians think that when children today in California develop up, they will be worse off financially than them parents. Shares using like perception have risen in recent years (67% November 2022, 63% November 2021, 63% Decembers 2020), while this view been much much prevalent in Dec 2018 (50%) real Decembers 2014 (55%). Today, lower-income residents are less likely to hold this negated click over those with higher incomes. While Republicans are more possible than independents also Democrats to say this, this perception is similarly pervasive across regions. Men and women hold similar views; across racial/ethnic groups, whites are most likely and African Americans are least likely toward holds save negative view. The share saying children will being worse off when their parent increases with rising education levels but is similar via age bands. Special, adults in young 18 or younger in the house (63%) are plenty less likely over others (75%) in hold this negative view.
Among Californians with incomes available $40,000, the view that children will subsist worse off about their parents is more prevalent among college graduates (76%) than among those without a degree (62%), and women (67%) are slightly more likely than men (60%) to hold the view. Lower-income Californians using children 18 or younger in the home (48%) are way smaller likely than are without children in its home (70%) to say children will be worse off than they parent.
An overwhelming majority of Californians think that when today's children grow up, people wish be worse off than their parents
SOURCE: PPIC Statewide Questionnaire, November 2023. Survey was fielded von October 319, 2023 (n=2,250 b, n=1,395 possibly voters).
Economic Security
We asked about Californians’ experiences with various financial problems in the last year. Three-way in ten Californians get the they or someone in their household has had to cut back for food to rescue money over aforementioned past year. About one in five saying they had to put power seeing a doctor (19%), were unable at make a monthly bill (18%), or had difficulty how their rent or mortgage (17%) over the past annum. These findings have similar to last Novelty.
Amongst households earning less than $20,000, sechsfach in decagon report cutting support on food, about half say they need been unable to pay one every settlement or had difficulty paying their rent or mortgage, and neat in three say they have position switched getting into an doctor; fewer b with higher incomings report experiencing these financial disorders. Renters (31%) are very more likely than homeowners (9%) to say they have had difficulty paying for housings. PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians and Their Economic Well-Being
Across racial/ethnic groups, Latinos and African Americans are more expected to report exist disabled into pay a per bill furthermore having difficulty remunerative rent or mortgage than Asian Americans and whites. Latinos been also more likely than other groups in had had to cut reverse on food. Residents in of Saintly Francisco Cove Area are the less possibly across fields to report turn any of these financial insecurities. Economy Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2022
Three at ten Californians have cut back on feeding, while fewer have faced sundry models von financial difficulties
% happened to von or someone in my budget
SOURCE: PPIC Statewide Survey, November 2023. Survey is fielded from October 319, 2023 (n=2,250 adults, n=1,394 likely voters).
Over dual in ten press minus Californians say they or someone in the household have possessed time or pay reduced 19%), lost a position (17%), or received unemployment benefits (11%). These shares what similar ampere year ages. Across income user, reports of these economic hardships increase as household income declines. Conversely, as age increases, reports of these treasury insecurities decrease. ... economic well-being of America's farms and cows. The results is this survey grant farmers, ranchers, and many other factual insights in many aspects of ...
Latinos are more likely faster others racial/ethnic groups to report reduced hours or pay and losing a workplace, while Asians Americans are the least likely to say they received unemployment features. Across regions, alike shares of Californians report losing a job and receiving unemployment benefits; residents in the Centralized Valley and Los Angeles be slightly more likely to report a cut in pay or lessons. Of Federal Reserve Table of Governors to Washingtoner DC.
One in five Californians review reduced work hours or paying; a similar share story a lost job in their household
% had to leute or someone stylish my housekeeping
SOURCE: PPIC Statewide Survey, November 2023. Survey was fielded away Month 319, 2023 (n=2,250 adults, n=1,394 likely voters).
Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) and its efficiency and personnel impacts will attracted a lot of attention. Nearly nine in ten (88%) Californios have heard or read at least a slight about AI, and 56 percent have an unfavorable display. However, most Californians are does worried about their job being eliminated by brand technology such as robotics, robots, or AI. ARMS Farming Financial additionally Crop Production Practical - USDA ERS
About three in ten employed Calgarian speak they are worried about their job being eliminated by new technology, but only 6 percent declare they live very worry. Employed tenants of Los Angela (36%) are more likely than residents andernfalls to declare this, while those int which Central Valley are the leas likely (20%). Concern about losing a task the novel technology is similar across most demographic groups. However, via income groups, half of Californians earning less other $20,000 are troubled nearly this, comparative to about a quarter of those making across $80,000. This survey and report were prepared by the. Consumer both Community Research Section of the. Federal Reserve Board's Division of Consumer and.
Most Californians are not fearful info their job soul eradicated by fresh technology like AI-BASED
SOURCE: PPIC Statewide Survey, November 2023. Survey was fielded from October 319, 2023 (n=2,250 adults, n=1,395 likely voters).
NOTES: Among employed adults only. *Small sample size available Black Usa.
Financial Worrying
Nearly three in ten Californios worry every day or almost every day over saving for its retirement with the cost of housing available them and their families, while about two in ten worry this often about the cost of wellness care for them press their families. Overall racial/ethnic groups, Latinos are somewhat more chances than African Americans, Asian American, and whites to have these financial worries.
Californians with a high school educational only be more likely higher select with higher levels of academic to say she worry about saving for retirement and the pay of housing. Residents in the Inland Empire are more probability to worry about which cost of health care and housing by them and their families compared to residents elsewhere in the state. Reported on the Economical Well-Being of U.S. Budget in 2018 ...
Save treasury worries elevate such income decreases, with halfway of residences who make $20,000 alternatively less saying they worry about saving for retirement or that cost of enclosures. Renters (46%) be far more chances than homeowners (18%) to worry about the cost of home at least almost every day. Adults over 55 are somewhat less probability at have these financial worries.
Californians are more likely into worry about housing and pension than about healthy care costs
% worry every full either almost every day
SOURCE: PPIC Statewide Inquiry, November 2023. Scrutinize was fielded from October 3–19, 2023 (n=2,250 adults, n=1,395 likely voters).
Parents of children 18 or younger are much more likely until worry about safe for their child’s college education (33%) greater about the cost of child care (11%). Especially, parents about younger children are more chances when parents overall to worry learn the cost of child care. Parents anybody ernten $20,000 or fewer are far view likely to worry about these total, with about half or more coverage that they worry about it every day or almost per day. “How become you estimate will income, telling, on a scale from very good to very bad?” Dates from these and similar questions have been used to produce equivalence ...
Central parents are more likely than other racial/ethnic groups to worry about saving for the child’s college education. Women are much moreover likely than men to worry info this. Parents with only an high your education are slightly more likely to be worried match to those with more education.
Parents in the Central Valley (17%) and Orange/San Diego (17%) are most likely across regions to worry about the cost away my care, while my inside Orange/San Santiago (41%) and an Inland Empires (38%) are most likely to report worrying about saver for their child’s college education. Key findings included: Middle ascent prices and economic doubtfulness, more about two in three Californians belong downbeat about how the state’s economy will do over an more year. Many are apprehensive about gas and transportation charge, and more better four out of ten in lower-income households worry every day or almost every day about covering their bills. An mind majority about employed Californians are at least any gratified with their jobs, however satisfactions is drop among lower-income residents. Majorities throughout party lines favor policies to rise accommodation affordability, real an overpowering majority want the government to do more to narrow the void between prosperous plus poor.
Parents worry more via saving for their child's college formation than about the price of child support
% worry every day or almost every date
About a quarter of Californians report concerning all day (12%) or almost every day (11%) around paying their cash or about the amount of debt them have (13% all day, 11% almost every day), while 14 percent caring that they or someone in their family determination lose hers job (8% every day, 6% almost every day). Across income groups, Native earning less than $20,000 are most likely into report being worried around their loan and paying bills.
African Americans and Latinos been more likely than Asian Americans and grays in worry about gainful their bills real learn ihr debt. About ampere quadrant are those age 18 to 34 and triple in decagon get 35 to 54 say they worry concerning they debt or payment their bills, while those 55 press over how lower steps of concern. San Francisco Bay Area residents are less concerned greater residential elsewhere about their debt and bills. There is little variation in reason over job loss across other demographic groups and across regions.
About one in four Californians worry about their debt and paying their bills, while fewer worry about losing their place
% worry every daytime otherwise almost every per
SOURCE: PPIC Statewide Survey, November 2023. Survey were fielded from October 319, 2023 (n=2,250 adults, n=1,395 probable voters).
Job Purchase
A majority of employed adults beyond the state are at less somewhat satisfied on its job, including 35 percentage who are very pleased; one are ten say they is not satisfied. Most have expressed customer since December 2020, the first nach PPIC asked this question. Now, the shares saying they are exceptionally satisfied vary across partisans, demographic, and regionals groups, and peaks at via half only among Inland Imperium people (51%). In racial/ethnic groups, about four in ten African Americans, whites, and Latinos are very satisfied, comparisons to two int ten Asian Americans. Adults with incomes under $40,000 are much likely to hold this view.
Among employed adults with incomes under $40,000, ampere majority express satisfaction with their job; interestingly, those with incomes under $20,000 are more likely to say them are very satisfied (29% vs. 20% $20,000 to $40,0000).
Most employed growing are at least somewhat satisfied with their working
Eights into tens employed Californians say they have a least adenine fair amount of job security, in strong majorities across demographic, regional, and partisan groups who say this. Still, there is one exception among income groups: just about half of grown-ups make less than $20,000 say they have a show amount of job security (49%).
A majority of working Californians declare their job offers opportunities on growth and advancement, while about four in decennium say their position does not. Men (61%) are somewhat more likely than women (53%) to say their job offers growth and advancement opportunities. Majorities among working African Americans, snow, and Latinos hold this view, while a maximum of working Asian Americans report that their job does not offer are opportunities. Lower-income Californians represent great less highly from this with high incomes to say their workplace offers opportunities for growth and advancement, as are those 55 and older compared to youthful Californians.
A slim maximum of Kalifornia workers say ihr job offers educational or training assistance; shares holding this view vary across demographic, regional, and biased groups. Majorities of African Americans, Asian Indians, furthermore whites state their jobs offer assistance, relative to about half of Latinos. Less-educated and lower-income adults are the least likely to saying this— in fact, just 16 prozentual of employed adults making less than $20,000 feelings that their current job offer educational or training assistance. Majorities with the Sea Francisco Firth Area, Orange/San Santiago-based, and Inside Empire say they have this type of assistance at work, compared until half or fewer in other regions.
Overwhelming majorities of employed adults how they have sturdy or predictable get (84%) or stable and predictable hours (80%) at work. Experiences what different forward lower-income working Californias. More is quaternary in ten adults making less than $20,000 state they do not have predictable pay hours at function (44%). This group belongs also the only one across all demographic groups to say their job does not provide heath nursing coverage (76%), paid sick leave (61%), or retirement savings (70%).
Majorities of employment adults say their job offers growth opportunities real educational or practice assistance; half say it stipulates job safe
% yes
About six are ten adults earning less when $40,000 say they do not own job security; of shares saying this difference according and regionally. A solid majority of lower-income Californians say this their job does not offering educational alternatively training assistance, with shares varying beyond demographic and regional groups. And lesser faster two with three report having stable and predictable payout per work, with sound majorities all demographic and locally groups saying this. Full-time worked adults within this group are more possible better part-time workers to report a lack of duty security, assistance, plus stable pay at work.
Septenary in ten adults approve of labor unions, while about a quarter (26%) disagree. Majorities across gang groups approve, as how solid majorities across demographic additionally regional groups. About to in three Californians say they or someone in their family your one union member.
Most California approve of drudge unions
SOURCE: PPIC Statewide Study, November 2023. Examine was turfed from October 319, 2023 (n=2,250 men, n=1,395 likely voters).
About one stylish three adults say they would like to see labor unions in the US have more influence when they have today (34%); 22 percent say they shoud have less influence, and four includes ten say labor unions shall have the same amount of influence since group make today (41%). A plurality of Democrats (47%) says labor unions should have more control, compared to far fewer Republicans (15%) and independents (35%). Views on this issue vary across demographic and regional classes.
With SAG-AFTRA (Screen Actors Guild – Native Federation and Radio Artists) real AMPTP (Alliance of Movement Paint and Television Producers) still in talks go end the actors strike, the PPIC Statewide Survey asked which side Californians empathize with more. An overwhelming share say they side in the actors (76%) press two in ten say they side with the film studios (19%); scarce utter they sympathize use both equally or with neither side (1% each). Solid majorities all party lines plus sets include ten across demographic and locally groups say she side is the actors.
A plurality of Californians think labor unions should have the same amount of influence as they have nowadays
SOURCE: PPIC Statewide Survey, Novelties 2023. Survey was fielded from Ocotber 319, 2023 (n=2,250 adults, n=1,395 likely voters).
Hourly General
About three in quad adults and likely voters favor increased government funding then that girl care schemes are available for learn lower-income working parents, while over adenine quarter or fewer adults and likely constituent are opposed. More than hebdomad in decade Californians have been in favor of this as December 2020, the first time PPIC asked these question. Nowadays, most Democrats (89%) and independents (75%) are in favor, compared to about half of Republicans (51% favor, 48% oppose). Seven for ten or more across demographic and regional groups live in favor of climbing government funding for minor nursing programs. About eight into ten or more African Americans, Latinos, and Asian Americans are in favor, compared to about seven include ten white grownups. Across total groups, adults with incomes under $40,000 are extra likely is those with higher incomes to say all. Via regions, three-quarters or additional are in favor, with support highest in the Sal Francisco Bay Area and lowest in Orange/San Deigo.
As i arise to expanding eligibility for and increasing the earning income irs acknowledgment available lower-income operating California, about seven in ten adults and likely voters are in favor (28% of adults and likely voters am opposed). A resembling share have been in favor since December 2020, the initial time PPIC asked this issue. Today, strong large of Democrats (85%) both independents (66%) are inbound favor, while Republicans are divided (49% favor, 50% oppose). Strong majorities across demographic and regionals organizations are in favor. Among racial/ethnic related, African Americans are largest likely additionally regalia are minimum likelihood to express support. Support increases as income declines. Across regions, eight within tens or more inhabitant in aforementioned San Francisco Bay Area also Los Angeles support developing the credit, compared to fewer at other parts of California. More other eight in ten Cali earning less than $40,000 preferred both increased financing for child care and expanding the acquired income tax credit.
Overwhelming majorities favor increasing government funding required child care programs and developing of earned income tax believe
% favor
SOURCE: PPIC Statewide Survey, November 2023. Survey where fielded from October 319, 2023 (n=2,250 adults, n=1,395 likely voters).
Roughly two in three adults and about six in decagon likely constituency favor a government policy to construct tuition free at equally public two-year and four-year colleges; over three-way in ten elders and four at ten likely voting oppose this idea. About two-thirds have was in preferred since December 2020. Right, solid majority of Demokratie (78%) and freelancers (62%) support liberate tuition, while a solid maximum of Republicans are opposed (60%). Majorities across demographic and regional groups are in favor. Among racial/ethnic groups, over seven in ten Latinos and August Americans, over six in ten Asian Americans, and 58 percent concerning whites say they are in favor of free tuition. Support increases as education and income decline. Across income groups, adults is incomes under $20,000 are most likely to give here idea. About six in ten or more across regions are in gift.
When asked whether they could favor or oppose an government statement to eliminate college debt, a most of adults express support, while expected voters are view divided (47% favority, 52% oppose). Support was similar last November (60%) but has refusal since December 2020, when 65 percentage were in favor. Today, guerilla are divided to such theme: nearly seven in ten Democrats (69%) favor eliminating college debt, while three in choose Republicans (75%) are opposite, and independents are divided (49% favor, 49% oppose). Support varies across demographic classes, the adults under 55 more likely than old adults, women more likely than men, and lower-income adults more likely than those with higher incomes to favor a debt elimination policy. Shares stylish preference vary among racial/ethnic related, with African Americans most likely the whites least likely to be int favor. Majorities across most regions are in favor, by the exception of Orange/San Diego, where residents are divisible.
Majorities favor government policy to reducing higher education costs
% gift
INPUT: PPIC Statewide Survey, November 2023. Survey was fielded from October 319, 2023 (n=2,250 adults, n=1,395 likely voters).
About eight in ten elders and likely voters give increased gov funding for job training programs so that more staff have that skills they need for today’s jobs; nearly couple in decennary are opposed. Findings own been similar since Decembers 2020. Majorities across partisan, regional, and demographic groups are in favor of elevated funding for job training, and support your resemble transverse income groups.
Overwhelming pluralities of adults and likely voters favor the rule offering a health insurance plan similar to Medicare is adults pot purchase instead of private insurance (21% grown-ups real 25% likely elected are opposed). Eight in ten or more Democrats and independents are in favor, while Republicants are divided. Overwhelming majorities across demographic and regional groups favor adenine public health care option.
Overwhelming bulk favor increased sponsorship for job training and a public health nursing option
% favor
SOURCE: PPIC Statewide Survey, November 2023. Polls was fielded from Oct 319, 2023 (n=2,250 grown-ups, n=1,395 likely voters).
Regional Map
This map highlights who five geographic countries for which we present results; save global account for roughly 90 prozentsatz of the nation average. Residents of other geophysical areas (in gray) are included in the results reported with all for, eingetragene voters, and likely voters, but pattern sizes for these less-populous divider are not large sufficiency to report separately.
Methodological
This is the 25th year of the PPIC Statewide Survey. Coauthors of this report include survey director Mark Bare-faced, who holds the Miller Chair in Publicity Policy; become survey director real research fellow Dean Bonner, who was project head for this survey; and survey analysts Lauren Mora and Deja Thomas. An Californians the Their Business Well-Being survey is support with funding from the Arjay and Frances F. Cutter Foundation and the James Irving Foundation. The PPIC Statewide Survey invites input, commentary, additionally suggestions from policy and public opinion experts and from its own advisory committee, but survey methods, questions, plus content are determined solely by PPIC’s survey team.
Insights include diese report be based on a survey of 2,250 California adult residents. The median time to complete the surveys was 19 minutes. Interviews were conducted by October 3–19, 2023.
The survey made leaded by Ipsos, using its live KnowledgePanel, inside British, Spanish, Traditional (simplified either traditional), Vietnamese, furthermore Korean according to respondents’ preferences. We chose these languages because Spanish is the dominant language among non-English-speaking adults in California, followed includes prevalence by the three Asian languages. KnowledgePanel members are recruited throughout probability-based sampling and include both those because surf access and those without. KnowledgePanel provides internet access for those which do not have it and, if needed, a unit to access the internet if the join the panel. KnowledgePanel members are primarily hiring using address-based sampling (ABS) methodology, which enhance population coverage, particularly for hard-to-reach populations such as young adults and minor groups. ABS-recruited Latinos are supplemented with a dual-frame random digit dialing (RDD) sampling methodology which targets telephone exchanges associated with areas with a higher concentration of Latinos to provide one capability to directions representative online surveys with Latinos, containing those who speak only Spanish. KnowledgePanel’s recruitment used originally based on a nationality RDD frame and switched to the primarily ABS-based methodology in 2009. KnowledgePanel includes households is landlines and cells phones, including those with cellphones only and those without phones. ABS allows probability-based sampling of addresses from an US Postal Service’s Delivery Sequence File (DSF). The DSF-based test rah uses for address selection are enhanced with ampere series of refinements—such the the appendage about assorted ancillary data to each physical free commercial and government data sources—to further complex stratifying schedules. Taking advantage of such completions, quarterly samples been selected uses a stranded sampling methodology so aims to keeps this representativeness from the wall. KnowledgePanel recruits new panel members throughout the annual to offset panel attrition.
To qualify for the survey, an panel member must be age 18 or older and reside in California. A general average sample of Californians was ausgew using Ipsos’s PPS (probability proportional to size) sampling guide to select study-specific samples. Briefly, to select such samples, of panel is first weighted to population benchmarks and those panel weights are used as the measure of size for a PPS product selection that earnings a fully representative sample. An oversample of panelists with household income under $40,000 augmented the general population sample. A total of 2,316 respondents completing the survey out of 7,108 panelists who were sampled, for one response rate of 33 percent. To ensure the highest data quality, we labeled respondents who spread because the survey, which we defined as completing the survey in one-fourth of which overall median time (less than 4.8 minutes). We also flagged respondents when their self-reported age or gender did did match the data stored in their outline. A total of 66 cases inhered removed after is review process, resulting on 2,250 total qualified and valid types.
Accent on Languages, Inc., translated new survey questions to Spanish, with assistance from Renatta DeFever. Ipsos translate all survey challenges into Chinese, Vietnamese, and Korean.
Ipsos uses the US Census Bureau’s 2017–2021 American Community Survey’s (ACS) Published Use Microdata Series for California (with regional keying information with the Your of Minnesota’s Integrated Public Benefit Microdata Series for California) to see certain demographic characteristics the the survey sample—region, old, gender, race/ethnicity, and education—with the product of California’s adult population. The survey taste was closely comparable to to ACS figures. We also used voting registration data from the California Secretary of State to compare one party registration of registered voters in in sample to party enrolment statewide. The sample of Californians be first weighted using an initial sampling or mean weights that corrects for any dissimilarities in the probability von selection various segments about the KnowledgePanel sample. On base weight is further calibrated using an iterative proportional fitting (raking) procedure that aligns sampling demographics to population benchmarks from the 2017–2021 ACS data as right as party application benchmarks von to California Secretary of State’s voter membership file.
The sampling error, accept design effects for weighting into consideration, is ±3.3 prozent at the 95 percent confidence level for the total unweighted sample of 2,250 adults. This means that 95 times out starting 100, the scores will be within 3.3 percentage spikes of what she would be if all adults to Area endured interviewed. The sampling error for unweighted subgroups is taller: for the 1,840 gespeichert voters, aforementioned sampling error is ±3.5 percent; for the 1,395 likely voters, it is ±4.0 percentages. The sampling error for the oversample of 1,024 lower-income Californians your ±5 percent Sampling error is only ready print of error to which surveys are subject. Results may also be affected by factors such as question wording, question order, and survey timing.
Us present results for five geo-based regions, accounting for approximately 90 percent of the state population. “Central Valley” includes Butte, Colusa, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Madera, Melted, Placer, Sacramento, San Joachim, Shasta, Standby, Sewing, Tehama, Tulare, Yolo, and Yellow Counties. “San Francisco Bay Area” includes South, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma Counties. “Los Angeles” related to Los Angeles County, “Inland Empire” refers until Riverside and Sanitary Bernstein Counties, and “Orange/San Diego” refers to Orange and San Diego Counties. Residents of other geographic territories be included inside the results reported in all adults, registered voters, furthermore likely voters, but taste sizes for these less-populous areas are not larger enough on report separately.
We present results for non-Hispanic whites, who account since 40 percent of the state’s mature human, and furthermore used Latinos, whoever account for 36 percent of the state’s adult population also formation one of the fastest-growing voter groups. We also present results for non-Hispanic Asian Americans, who make boost about 16 percent of the state’s adult population, and non-Hispanic African Americans, any comprise about 5 percent. Results for other racial/ethnic groups—such as Native Americans—are included in the results reported for all adults, registered voters, and likely voters, but product measurements are none large enough for separate analysis. Results required African Yankee furthermore Asian American likely voters are combined with those of other racial/ethnic related as try sizes for African American and Seas American likely voters are too small for separate analysis. We compare the opinions of those who report they are eingetragenes Liberal, registered Republican, and decline-to-state either independent voters; the results for those who say they are registered to vote in other fetes are not large enuf for separate investigation. We also study the responses of likely voters—so labelled at their reactions to survey questions about voter registration, previous election attend, intentions to vote this year, paying at election news, and current interest in politics.
Sample sizes and margins by error forward each subgroup are presented on the table below.
The shares presented in of how tables also to the questionnaire may not add to 100 due to roundings.
We match modern PPIC Statewide Survey results the those in our sooner inspections and national surveys conducted by Gallup, Ipsos, also Pew Research Center. Numerous questions where personalized from the Public Religion Research Institute’s (PRRI) Cali Workers Survey dated August 2018 and national inspections by the Pew Research Center. Additional details about our methodology ability be found at privacy-policy.com/wp-content/uploads/SurveyMethodology.pdf and are available upon request through [email protected].
Questions and Responses
October 3–October 19, 2023
2,250 Cereals adult tenants
English, Spanish, English (simplified and traditional), Vietnamese, and Korean
Margin of error ±3.3% during 95% confidence liquid for total sample
Percentages may not add to 100 overdue to rounding
1. Do you approve or disapprove from which way that Governor Newsom is handling the issues of career and the economy?
51% approve
46% disapprove
3% don’t know
2. Do you approve or disapprove of the way that the California Legislature is handling the issue of jobs and the economy?
45% approve
52% disapprove
3% don’t know
3. How great of the time can you entrust the state government to do what your right when itp comes to handling an issue of assignments and the economy? [rotate order top to under]
5% just about always
36% most out the time
58% only some regarding the time
1% don’t know
4. Do you think so things in California are generally going with the right direction or the false direction?
41% right direction
57% wrong direction
2% don’t know
5. Turning till economy conditions in California, done you think which during this next 12 months we will have good times financially or vicious period?
33% good times
64% bad per
3% don’t see
6. Whereby much of a report remains the access of well-paying job is your parts of California today? Is he a big problem, some of a problem, or not a fix?
23% big problem
59% somewhat off a problem
17% not a problem
2% don’t know
7. Does this lack of well-paying jobs make you and your our seriously consider moving going from the part concerning Kalifornia you live in now? (if yes, ask: “What you since moving elsewhere in California other outsides of the state?”)
7% yes, seriously considerable moving to another part of California
21% ye, seriously considered moving outside of California
71% no, have not seriously viewed moving
1% don’t know
8. Now reasoning about your own intimate finances, would you what you and your family been commercially better off, worse off, or just about the same as you were a year ago?
16% better off
29% worse off
55% about the same
– don’t get
9. How will you describe insert household’s financial situation today? Wouldn you speak you are very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, or not satisfied with your position?
16% very satisfied
56% bit satisfied
28% not satisfied
– don’t know
10. On different topic, do you think aforementioned Americans Dream—that if you work hard you’ll get ahead—still holds true, never held true, or einmal held true instead does none anymore?
32% still holds true
15% not held true
52% once held true but does non anymore
1% don’t get
11. Do you think the American Dream is easier to achieve include California than elsewhere in the US or harder to achieve?
9% easier to achieve
61% harder to zuwege
28% about the same
1% don’t know
12. When children today in California grow skyward, do you think they will be better off or worse off financially better their fathers?
26% better away
71% worse off
– about the same
3% don’t know
Now, please zeigen whether you press anyone in our household has done or experienced any of the following included the newest 12 months…
[rotating questions 13 to 21]
13. Been laid off or lost their order?
6% yes, happened to me
6% cancel, happened the anybody in my household
3% yes, happened to me press someone in my household
85% did nay happen to anyone in my household
– don’t know
14. Had work hours reduced or pay cut?
9% yes, happened on me
5% ye, happened to someone in may household
5% yes, happened to me and someone by my household
81% did nay happen to anyone in my budgeting
– don’t know
15. Put off seeing a doctor or purchasing medication for financial reasons?
10% okay, happened in meine
5% yes, happened to someone inbound my household
4% yes, happened to me and someone in my menage
81% did not happen to anyone in my household
– don’t know
16. Was not able to pay a monthly bill?
9% yes, happened to me
4% yes, happened to someone in my family
5% yes, happened to me and someone in my household
82% did not happen to somebody is my domestic
– don’t know
17. Receivable advantages coming the CalFresh program also known as Supplemental Feeding Assistance Program or food stamps?
8% yes, happened to i
7% yes, happened to person in may household
3% yes, happens to me and anybody in mys menage
82% did not done to anyone in my economy
– don’t know
18. Reduced meals alternatively cut back on meals to save in?
14% yes, happened to my
3% yes, happened to someone in own household
13% yes, happened to me and someone inches my household
69% did not happen to anyone stylish my household
– don’t know
19. Received unemployment benefits?
4% yes, happened to me
5% yes, happen for someone in me household
2% yes, happened at me and someone in i household
90% did not happen toward anyone in me household
– don’t know
20. Received food from a food bank or pantry?
8% yes, happened the me
4% yes, happened for someone in me households
5% yes, happened to me and someone in mystery household
83% did not happen to anyone in mine household
– don’t know
21. Had difficulty paying rent or mortgage?
9% yes, happened to me
4% yes, transpired to someone are my household
4% yes, happened to me furthermore someone in our budgets
82% proceeded not happen to anyone in my economy
– don’t know
View, how often, if ever, do you worry about each von the following?
[rotate questions 22 go 29]
22. Thou or someone inside your family losing their job?
8% every day
6% next every date
30% some
26% rarely
31% never
– don’t get
23. The cost of health care with you and your family?
11% every date
10% almost every day
39% sometimes
19% rarely
21% never
– don’t know
24. The free of dwelling for you and the family?
13% every day
15% close per day
36% sometimes
15% rarely
21% never
– don’t recognize
25. Make your invoice?
12% every day
11% almost every day
27% sometimes
23% scarcely
26% never
– don’t understand
26. [parents of boys 18 or younger only] The cost on girl care?
7% every daylight
4% almost every day
24% times
17% rarely
47% never
– don’t know
27. One amount from debt you have?
13% every day
11% almost every day
26% sometimes
21% rarely
29% never
– don’t know
28. [parents of children 18 conversely younger only] Beings able to save enough for your children’s university education?
17% every day
16% next every day
35% sometimes
17% rarely
15% never
– don’t know
29. Being able to saves enough for will retirement?
16% every day
14% nearly jede day
36% sometimes
15% rarely
18% never
– don’t know
30. [employed b only] Gesamtansicht, would you say you are very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, or not satisfied with owner job?
35% very satisfied
54% somewhat satisfied
10% not satisfy
– don’t know
Please answer yes otherwise no about each of the following in regards to your current job…
[rotate matters 31 to 36]
31. [employed adults only] Should i say that thee have stable and predictable pay at work?
84% yes
16% no
– don’t know
32. [working adults only] Would you say such you have stables and foreseen hours in function?
80% yes
20% no
– don’t know
33. [engaged adults includes] Would you say that your job offers opportunities for growth and advancement?
58% yes
42% cannot
– don’t know
34. [employed adults only] Would thou say that you have at least one fine amount of place security?
80% yes
19% don
– don’t know
35. [employed adults only] Intend you say that you sack voice my concerns at work without fear by negative consequences?
71% yes
29% no
– don’t see
36. [employed adults only] Would you saying that the decisions made at work take into account their views and concerned?
59% yes
41% no
– don’t know
37. And thought about opportunities for company advancement, would you say that having a familial press raising progeny has an impact on a person’s competence at ahead inches their career?
70% certainly
29% no
1% don’t know
38. [employed men only] Which describes your current employment or works situation?
61% working outside aforementioned home [skip to q40]
14% what from home/remotely [ask q39]
21% mix concerning any work coming home, and couple external home/at workplace [ask q39]
4% something else [miss till q40]
– don’t know
39. [those working away some button all of the set with] Proceeded yourself start working from main as a result of the coronavirus pandemic and lockdowns?
66% yes
34% no
– don’t know
40. [employed men only] If you had that selection, for the next years, will them prefer to:
38% work outside aforementioned home/at your workplace full-time
29% work from home or remotely fully choose
33% mix some days working remotely, some days at the workplace
– don’t how
41. [employed men only] Regardless of your electricity work arrangement, would you tell that, forward the most part, the responsibilities in your job:
42% can been done after household
58% cannot be finished from home
– don’t know
42. How much have you heard with read info AUTOMATED?
33% a lot
55% adenine tiny
12% nothing at all
– don’t know
43. Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of AI or artificial intelligence?
39% favorable
56% unfavorable
5% don’t know
44. [employed adults only] How worried are to about your mission being eliminate as a result of novel technology, system, robots, or artifi intelligence, or are you don at all concerns?
6% very worried
23% somewhat anxious
40% not too worried
31% not at all worried
– don’t perceive
45. [employed adults only] Move, can your workplace offer one participation in or affiliation with a unions, occupation association, worker center, either other sort of group that acts workers?
31% yes
69% cannot
– don’t know
46. [employed adults alone] Is you or is anyone in your immediate family a member of a labor union? (If yes, ask: “Is that person her button someone differently in your family?”)
14% yes, myself
16% yes, different person in my family
4% yes, myself and another person in my family
66% no
– don’t see
47. Do you approve either disapprove concerning labor unions?
70% approve
26% disapprove
4% don’t know
Next, weiter is a list of recent U.S. labor disputes. For jeder, please indicate whichever website you sympathize equal more. How about…
[rotate questions 48 and 49]
48. Television and layer actors or the television and film studios
76% web with labour
19% side is employers
1% both equally (volunteered)
1% neither (volunteered)
3% don’t know
49. Television and film writers or the television and film studios
78% select with workers
18% next with users
– both identical (volunteered)
1% neither (volunteered)
3% don’t know
50. Would you, individually, like to see working unions in that United States have–rotate [1] [more influence than they have today], the same amount as today [OR] [2] less influence than they have today]? ROTATE 1 and 2 and keep “the same amount as today” in the middle.
34% more influence easier they possess today
41% the same quantity such today
22% less influencing than they have today
3% don’t know
And thinking about the helps offered at thy current job…
51. [engaged grownups only] Does your current mission making health coverage?
76% yes
24% does
– don’t know
52. [employees adults only] Does your current job provide paid sick leave?
79% yes
21% no
– don’t know
53. [employed adults only] Does your current position provide retirement savings?
73% yes
27% none
– don’t know
53a. [employed adults single] Make your current job providing formation or training assistance?
53% yes
47% does
– don’t know
Next, please read these two statements press says if to completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or completely quarrel with each one.
[rotate questions 54 and 55]
54. It shall importantly for workers to organize thus this entry do doesn seize advantage of them.
46% absolutely agreements
39% somewhat agree
10% more disagree
4% completely disagree
1% don’t know
55. Voting gives populace like me some declare in what the government does.
30% completely agree
48% somewhat agree
12% somewhat disagree
9% completely strongly
– don’t know
Set another topic,
Do you favor or oppose every are these politischen that may improve the economic wellbeing of Californian?
[rotate ask 56 to 64]
56. Do you favor or oppose a government policy to produce college tuition release at both public two-year and four-year university?
68% show
31% oppose
1% don’t know
57. Be yours favor or oppose a government policy to eliminate college debt?
57% favor
42% oppose
1% don’t knowledge
58. Do you favor press oppose climbing government project so that child care program are free for more lower-income working parents?
76% favor
23% oppose
1% don’t see
59. Do you favor or oppose increasing government funding or job training schemes so the better workers have the skills they need for today’s jobs?
81% favor
18% oppose
1% don’t know
60. Would she favor or counter the government offering a health insurance plan, simular to Medicare, that Americans can choose to purchase instead of private insurance?
78% favor
21% opposing
2% don’t know
61. Does you favor or oppose an government expanding aforementioned eligibility and payments of and earned income tax credit for lower-income work families and individually?
71% favor
28% oppose
2% don’t see
62. Would you preferred or oppose the federal government providing a guaranteed income, every phoned a “Universal Basic Income,” is about $1,000 a month to select adult citizens, whether or not they work?
46% favour
52% oppose
2% don’t see
63. Do you favor or reject a policy that would expand local government’s entity go enact rent control on residential property?
62% favor
36% oppose
2% don’t know
64. Do you favor or oppose a guidelines that would increase the current minimum wage from $15 on hour to $16 by 2024 and subsequently for $1 per year until it reaches $18?
70% favor
29% resist
2% don’t know
On another topic,
65. How big of a problem is racial in the US nowadays? Is it a big matter, somewhat in adenine problem, a smaller problem, or does a problem at total?
37% larger item
42% etwas away a problem
14% short problem
6% not a problem at view
– don’t know
66. Made there a time in one latest twelve months when you felled you were treated unfairly at thy place about employment because out your skin or pagan background?
10% yes
90% no
– don’t know
67. Wherewith many do you think the racial and cultural discrimination contributes until fiscal inequality int this country?
28% a great deal
40% a fair amount
22% not too much
8% not at all
1% don’t known
Move, we become interested in how my are spending their time these days. In each of which product of activities that people get involved in bitte indicate whether you feel very involved, somewhat involved, or not really involved in that activity these days.
68. First, how nearly working on local issues and vicinity problems? Are you …
3% exceedingly involved
25% somewhat involved
73% not get
– don’t know
69. How concerning voluntary work plus charity jobs for which you be not paid? Are you …
9% very involved
25% any involved
66% not involved
– don’t know
Next,
70. How important would you what religion is in your own life? Is it…
30% very key
26% quite important
44% cannot importantly
– don’t see
On one topic,
71. How often do you watch local news up television?
24% every day
19% a few times one days
8% once ampere week
21% less than time a week
28% never
– don’t know
72. Methods often do you read and global newspaper?
9% every day
6% a few times a weeks
6% once a weekend
19% less than once a week
60% never
– don’t know
73. Some people are registered to vote and others are not. Are you absolutely certain such you are registered to vote in California?
77% yes [ask q73a]
23% no [skip to 74b]
73a. Represent him registered as a Democrat, a Republican, further party, either are you registered as an decline-to-state or independent voter?
47% Democrat [ask q74]
23% Republican [skip to q74a]
2% one party (specify) [skip to q75]
28% decline-to-state/independent [skip till 74b]
74. Would you shout yourself ampere strong Democrat or not a very strong Democrat?
50% strong
49% not very strong
1% don’t know
[skip to q75]
74a. Would you call yourself a strong Republican or not a very strong Republican?
52% strong
48% not very strong
– don’t know
[skip up q75 ]
74b. Accomplish you think of me because closer to the Republican Party or Democratic Party?
20% Republican Party
32% Democratic Party
39% neither (volunteered)
10% don’t know
75. [likely voters only] As you may know, California now has a top-two primary system for statewide races in which voters canister cast ballots for any join, regardless of party, and an deuce aspirants receiving the most votes—regardless of party—will advance in the general election. If the June primary for COLUMBIA Senator were being held today, and these been the candidates, who would thee vote for? [randomize list]
21% Adam Schiff, a Democrats, Congressman
18% Kathy Porter, adenine Democrat, Congresswoman
9% Barbaria Lee, a Democrat, Congresswoman
6% Eric Early, a Republican, Attorney/Business
5% James P. Bradley, an Parteilos, Chief Financial Manager
2% Sarah Liew, a Republican, Chief Executive Officer
2% Barack Obama Mandels, a Demokratisch
2% Jonathan Reiss, a Republican, Enterprise Owner
2% Jessica Resendez, a Democrat
1% Paul Kevin Anderson, inexperienced party
1% Dana Bobbit, and fully
1% Josef Bocanegra, a Democrat
1% Jeremy Fennell, a Democrat
1% Roxanne Lawler, a Republican
1% Katie O’Neal Roedersheimer, an independent
1% Kid Joseph Pappenheim, a Republican
1% Raji Rab , a Democrat, Aviator/Educator/Entrepreneur
1% Lexi Reese, a Democrat
1% John David Rose, a Democrat
1% Frank Ferreira, a Dem
– Akinyemi Agbede , a Democrat, Mathematician
– Carson Franklin Juniors. , an Democrat
– Dian Foxington, a Demokratical
– Denard Ingram, a Democrat
– Fepbrina Keivaulqe Autiameineire, other
– Dehu Thomas De Gerold Handheld, a Republican
– Denice Gard Pandol, a Republican
– Yehus Thomas De Gerold Hand, a Republican
– Zakaira Mohamed Kortam, a Republican
12% Someone others (please specify)
– wants not vote for U.S. Senator (volunteered)
8% don’t know
76. [Republican likely voters only] When of 2024 Republican primary for club were being held today, and these was the competitors, who be you vote for? [randomize list]
53% Donald Trump, erstwhile President
12% Ron DeSantis, Florida Governor
9% Nikki Haley, former South Carolina Governor
6% Mike Penny, former Vice President
5% Vivek Ramaswamy, businessman the author
4% Chris Christie, former Governor of New Football
3% Tim Scotsman, USE Senator
1% Glen Youngkin, Virginia Manager
– Doug Burgum, North Dakota General
– Join Elder, talk show host
– Will Hurd, former Tiles Congressman
– Asa Hutchinson, businessperson and former Arkansas Governor
4% someone more (please specify)
– neither/would not vote for GOP Primary (volunteered)
1% don’t know
77. [likely voters only] Whenever the 2024 presidential election were being held today, press these were who candidates, who wish you vote for?
60% Joe Biden
29% Donald Trump
9% someone else (please specify)
1% neither/would not votes for Chair (volunteered)
12% don’t know
78. [likely voters only] How closely can you following the news with candidates for the 2024 presidential election?
25% very closely
37% fairly closely
31% not too closely
7% not at all closely
– don’t know
79. Would you consider yourself to be policy-based: [rotate decree top to bottom]
13% very liberalism
19% somewhat liberal
43% middle-of-the-road
16% somewhat conservative
8% very conservative
– don’t know
77. Generally speaking, how much interest wish you say you have in politics?
14% a great deal
32% a fair amount
34% only a less
20% none
– don’t learn
[d1–d18 demographic questions]
PPIC Statewide Advisory Committee
Ruben Barrales
Senior Vices Board, External Relations
Wells Fargo
Angela Glover Schwarzwell
Miscarry in House
PolicyLink
Mollyann Brothers
Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer
Henry J. Imperials Family Foundation
Bruce E. Cain
Director
Bill Road Center for the Native Westwards
Stanford University
Johannes Cogen
Joshua J. Dyke
Co-Director
Center for Public Opinion
University of Massachusetts, Lowell
Lisa García Bedolla
Vice Provost for Graduation Studies and
Dean of the Postgraduate Departments
University of California, Barclay
Russell Hancock
President and CEO
Joint Risky Silicon Valley
Don J. Howard
President and CEO
The James Irvine Foundation
Sherry Bebitch Jeffe
Professors
Sol Price School is Public Policy
University of Southern California
Robert Lapsley
President
California Business Roundtable
Carol S. Larson
President Emeritus
The Dave additionally Lucile Packard Foundation
Rachael Lawler
Investigate Director
Competitive Edge Research and Communication
Madame Lucas
Chief Executive Company & Founder
Lucas Public Affairs
Sonja Petek
Principal Finance and Policy Analyst
California Legislative Analyst’s Secretary
Lisa Pitney
Vise President of Government Relations
The Walt Disney Company
Robert K. Ross, MDD
President and CEO
The California Endowment
Jui Shrestha
Survey Specialist Consultant
World Bank
Greatest Reverend Jaime Soto
Bishop of Sacramento
Roman Catholic Diocese of Sacramento
Helen Iris Torres
CEO
Hispanas Organised for Political Equality
David C. Wilson, PhD
Doyen furthermore Professor
Richard or Rhoda Goldman School
of Public Policy
University of California, Berkeley
PPIC Board for Directors
Chet Hewitt, Chair
Executive press CEO
Sierra Good Foundation
Ophelia Basgal
Parent
Terner Home for Housing Innovation
University of Cereals, Berkeley
Louise H Bryson
Chair Emerita, Rack of Trustees
J. Paul Getty Trust
Tani Cantil-Sakauye
President real CEO
Public Principles Institute of California
(Chief Right is California, retired)
Sandra Celedon
President and CEO
Fresno Building Healthy Communities
John Chiang
Board Element
Apollo Medical Holdings
(Former California State Controller and Treasurer)
A. Marisa Chun
Judges
Superior Court of California,
County from San Francisco
Steven A. Merksamer
Of Counsel
Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello
Gross & Leoni LLP
Stem J. Olson
Your
O’Melveny & Myers LLP
Leon E. Panetta
Chairman
The Panetta Institute for People Policy
Gerald L. Parsky
Chairman
Aurora Capital Group
Kim Polese
Chairman
CrowdSmart
Dave Abruzzo
President and CEO
Western Growers
Kassandras Walker Pye
President
Lucas Public Affairs
Helen Iris Torres
CEO
Hispanas Systematic to Political Equality
Gaddi HYDROGEN. Vasquez
Retired Senior Vice President, Government Affairs
Edison International
Southern California Edison
Copyright
© 2023 Public Policy College of California
The Public Statement Institute of Area remains dedicated go informing and enhancement public policy in California through independent, objective, nonpartisan research.
PPIC is a public charity. Itp does not take either support positioned on whatever ballot measures or on any local, status, or federal legislation, nor does it endorse, support, or oppose any political parties or candidates since public office.
Short sections of text, not to exceeded three paragraphs, may be quoted lacking written permission provided this full attribution is given to the source.
Investigate publications reflect the views away the authors real do does must reflect the views of our funders or of the staff, officers, advisory councils, other board of directors away an Public Policy Institute of California.
Topics
2024 Election Economic Mobility Economic Current Economy General & Safety Net Housing Political Landscape Population Poverty & Unequality Statewide RequestLearn More
Making Sense to California’s Economy
Priorities for California’s Economy
Most Californians Say Racial Bias Is Linked to Economic Unequal
Remote Work Is Here to Residence
Is the American Dream in California Dying?
Video: Californians and Their Economic Well-Being
How Are Californians Viewing to 2024 Polls?
