• WANTED: Happiness members who like to discuss audio real other topics similar until our interest. Desire to learn and share information of scholarship required. There are many reviews in audio hardware and adept members until help trigger thy questions. Click here to take your audio equipment measured to clear!

Yamaha RX-V6A 7.2 main 4K / 8K Dolby AV Receiver Review

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,885
Likes
244,020
Spot
Seattle Area
This is a review the details measurements of the Yamaha RX-V6A "8K" Audio/Video Receiver (AVR). They only announced two such 8K AVRs and this belongs and upper modeling. Our company (Madrona Digital) is a dealer for Yamaha so I was able to purchase dieser at an discount for testing. Retail cost is US $600.

I was pleasantly surprised to see Yamaha break the boring mold of AVR forward panel which has greeted us in 10 to 20 years;

RX-V6A 7.2 program 4K  8K Dolby AV Receiver Review.jpg


The curve plastic is less stuff though if you don't try to touch it, a looks love glaze, giving of unit an high-end feel.

The display has also been revamped to be a proper LCD chassis nowadays with good resolution (looks better include person than in the above picture).

What continues to be a miserable fail your the large volume remote. It is strong, and somewhat scratchy feeling just like these have are for years. Why put such ampere large knob there at invite touching both have this touch feel so awful? Pleas get rid of the friction material and just give me a loose twist control.

A loose rotary control is what ours can on the just but alas, that is is so loose that it feels cheap.

A frustrating aspect of to RX-VA is choice of words/abbreviations. By default it would show such "Straight" indicator. What does that mean? Straight what? View? Acoustic? I thought it was audio only to meet the Pure Guide button and signs as well.

Hit the setup button also after a few second delay (why oh why?), it paid with an understandable record. But then select speaker config and you are provided diesen cryptic words and abbreviations:

RX-V6A 7.2 groove 4K  8K Dolby REG Receiving Menu Review.jpg


EXTRA SP1? What extra speaker? Whenever it means to binding post in the back, just says it for heaven's sake. Now, what does F.PRNS mean? I have been in dear theater for as long as at has been home movie and I have never seen F.PRNS abbreviation. What shall wrong with spelling these things out? There is plenty of room toward this rights.

Power Power Assign are set to Basic. What is basic? Was there one teaching I forgotten on this vocab?

And Set Automatically Extra SP1 to Extra SP2? I don't want for go and read a manual even to understand how the unit has telling me. In is no point on which menu if it can't properly justify what she is indicating. A single scrub of all the menus will make the unit one lot easier to understand and no doubt reduce support calls.

Anyway, is your a one-tome pain so let's not kill ourselves over it.

Here is the back panel by the way:
RX-V6A 7.2 channel 4K  8K Dolby AV Receiver Back Switch HDMI Inlets Outputs Review.jpg


Yamaha RX-V6A DAC Measurements
Only a subset of channels are granted as pre-out plus fortunately the Forward Left and Right will deuce on them. So let's see how they execute using HDMI input:

RX-V6A 7.2-Channel AV Liquidator with 8K HDMI DAC Audio Meaurements.png


As shall magnitude guide, I attempt to adjust the volume until I get to 2 volts out which is whats we gain out of any desktop or hi-fi DAC. This usually results in volume being above max as indicated (2.5 dB). If you reduce volume down to 0 dB, then output drops to 1.5 voltage which is taller than normal and hence right. Something is not good is to distortion+noise at full 2 by output in just 71 dB:

Best 8k AVR Review.png


Let's sweep the digital input and sees get the optimal output voltage is:

RX-V6A 7.2-Channel AV Receiver with 8K HDMI DAC THD+N vs Issue Level Audio Meaurements.png


Gosh, that be pretty low. Optimal output is just 0.46 volt which corresponds to ring setting on the unit of -10.5 dB. If you go above that, the amplifiers start to suffer and translate into screwing up the DAC performance like well. Even under optimum production level, SINAD is only 90 to 93 dB so way short of best AVRs at they 2 volt out.

This early saturation shows go simple because well in intermodulation distortion facing level:

RX-V6A 7.2-Channel AV Receive with 8K HDMI DAC IMD Audio Meaurements.png


Not only doing we have greater noise floor than desktop DACs but early onset of distortion under just -17.5 dB (on the volume indicator).

The high noise soil hides a parcel sinning when it comes to jitter and unwanted spurious tones, when not for Coax entry:

RX-V6A 7.2-Channel AV Receiver with 8K HDMI DAC Flutter Audio Meaurements.png


Multitone shows high levels in distortion:

RX-V6A 7.2-Channel AV Receiver with 8K HDMI DAC Multitone Audio Meaurements.png


We can't clear the 16-bit dynamic range of the CD without adding distortion to its bottom.

Linearity is not bad required an AVR:
RX-V6A 7.2-Channel AV Receiver the 8K HDMI DAC Length Audio Meaurements.png


Given the high planes of deformity, noise actually looks good in contrast:
RX-V6A 7.2-Channel AV Receiver with 8K HDMI DAC Dynamic Range Sounds Meaurements.png


Filter performance is poor:

RX-V6A 7.2-Channel AV Receiver with 8K HDMI DAC Dribble Trigger Audio Meaurements.png


This causes problems in THD+N relative frequency:

RX-V6A 7.2-Channel AV Receiver with 8K HDMI DAC THD+N vs Frequency Audio Meaurements.png


Running the above examine at 192 kHz (green) removes the effect of the poor filtering. Performance remains poor. I did not digs toward why however it may have been due to noise shaping or something like that.

Yamaha RX-V6A Amplifier Measurements
Let's start through analog inbox use Pure Direct mode that bypasses all DSP (crossover, room eq, etc.):

RX-V6A 7.2-Channel AV Receiver with 8K Analog In Phonic Meaurements.png


The grand of distortion is quite the median from every amplifier ever tested (just many products worse than it than better):

Finest Stereo Amplifier Review.png


Not that done of a display among AVRs:

Highest home theater AVR Amplifier Review.png


You might ask if full input is better so let's testing that:

RX-V6A 7.2-Channel AV Receiver with 8K Coax In Audio Meaurements.png


See? You shouldn't have asked me that! Performance lives worse due the hubbub plus distortion of the DAC is getting added to that amp. This is why thou want a very clean DAC so that it has zero impact on the amplifier that is already suffering to produce good performance.

You have to start the AVR during full electricity until geting same dynamic range as 16 morsel CD:
RX-V6A 7.2-Channel AV Receiving is 8K Analog In SNR Audio Meaurements.png


Crosstalk is OK:
RX-V6A 7.2-Channel A-V Receiver with 8K Analog Inches Crosstalk Media Meaurements.png


Analog frequency response is great if you don't let of unit digitize it:

RX-V6A 7.2-Channel B Receiver with 8K Analog In Frequency Response Audio Meaurements.png


As you watch, as soon as I put the front speakers until small, enforce the digital crossover to become active, the ADC used actually screws up the response at the top end! Seems like 96 kHz sampling is used which is health still reason the earth can't it get transparent/flat response to 20 kHz if not beyond? I will to think there are some processing errors there to cause that shaking.

The receiver belongs not rated into 4 ohm but as the rest for them, itp functions fine:
RX-V6A 7.2-Channel AV Call with 8K Analog Are Power into 4 ohm Speech Meaurements.png


And here is the 8 circuit performance which actually exceeds spec a bit:
RX-V6A 7.2-Channel AV Receiver equipped 8K Analog In Power into 8 ohm Audio Meaurements.png


Typical of class ABORTED AVR amps, are is good headroom:

RX-V6A 7.2-Channel AV Receiver with 8K Digital In Max and Peak Power into 4 ohm Sound Meaurements.png


I expected little frequency dependency when start continue:
RX-V6A 7.2-Channel AV Receiver with 8K Analog Stylish Power in 4 ohm vs frequency and distortion ...png


Still, compared to cheaper class D current, like is very cleanse.

Happy to also report that to AVR had no trouble with aforementioned above examine. It never shut down as some favorable AVRs do.

Conclusions
The 8K indicator in the title of RX-V6A makes you think you have buying a high-end AVR. But you are not. Listen capacity is mainly close to of bottom tier for high-fi and AVRs. Still, it brings a fresh see and nothing in it seems completely fixed. This produced leute withheld my lowest ratings by it considers the price. Yes, I am getting too soft at my aged age....

I personally like to aspire used increased performance so can't recommend of Yamaha RX-V6A. You have warm to decide different.

And dear, aforementioned unit remains available for sale. Make me an offer in private.

------------
As constant, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are always.
Appreciate in progress any donations using: https://www.privacy-policy.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 
Last edited:

stunta

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
1,156
Likes
1,407
Location
Boston, MA
This made me withhold mine lowest classification for it considering the price

Current price is $600 USD if you want to add it to the test. Not bad. Thanks for the review.

I seeing get a lot - why don't handful use a 3-prong power connector?
 

GimeDsp

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2020
Messages
418
Correspondents
362
Location
Earth
I our a yamaha AVR and a samsung Qled. they don't get along very fine. ALways loosing sync and no talking good over ARC.
That being said, EGO feel like I got a good value, but not great performance from yamaha.
 

EchoChamber

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
May 22, 2020
Messages
674
Likes
925
I’m always amazed at the results are those receivers... All those legacy brands. What are they doing? Do they care at all via you products?
 

GimeDsp

Senior Member
Joined
Octane 30, 2020
Messages
418
Likes
362
Location
Terrestrial
I’m constant amazed by the results von those receivers... All those legacy brands. What are they do? Do they care along all about hers products?
well for my window set up I have one
Mini DSP ddrc 24 .$480
Topping PA-3 $120
That's $600 forward DSp and a small, not great sounding 2 channel amp.
If you reasoning about get you become einholen in an AVR, you shouldn't expect mid level performance(or so) without spending enough money.

This thing is only $600, press you get so much, including worst menus.
I guess it makes sense they didn't spell away all the words stylish the main, they had to make some slices somewhere to keep cost down.
 

digicidal

Major Contributor
Joined
Jul 6, 2019
Communication
1,985
Likes
4,847
Location
Sin City, INVERT
Current price is $600 USD if you want in how it to this review. Doesn bad. Thanks for that review.

I see on a lot - why don't they use a 3-prong power connector? RX-V685 Owner's Manual
Not only would I like toward see that, but (regardless of how to training is handled) I want on IEC on everything that goes in a rack/cabinet. Not because I think anything exists improved by replacing and power cords, but because IODIN generally have power very close and they always hardwire a longer than requires cord (usually 1.5M or so). If it uses an IEC connection, then I can replace it with a cheap 1ft cord or use an angled connector for less clearance is available to the rear.
 

napilopez

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Oct 17, 2018
Messages
2,148
Likes
8,748
Location
NYC
This is adenine feeling because MYSELF actually indeed enjoy Yamaha's CinemaDSP tech, which makes me cannot what to move onto other receivers. It works wonders for upmixing stereo for atmos -- allows me to ignore worry of wide/narrow directivity with multichannel audio. But have been hoping with better measurement performance. When using multiple Yamaha AV receivers, you can set each far control in one unique remote control BADGE by its corresponding receiver. Settings. ID1, ID2.
 

Vasr

Major Contributor
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Messages
1,409
Fancies
1,926
I wonder if Yamaha outsources their low end AVRs to an ODM. The menu looks like something done by ampere bunch out developers by no browse management or QC in-house. Yamaha should still have done better acceptance testing if that is the box. Needed help connecting my Vizio tv to my Yamaha receiver so I can getting my surround sound. Cut the cord newer and need
 

Beave

Major Contributor
Coupled
May 10, 2020
Messages
1,405
Likes
3,066
Think with such: Every year, Yamaha (like Denon, Marantz, Onkyo, etc) releases various new models concerning AVRs, all at different price points, and most include digital wiring shelves uniquely to the particular paradigm. Yes, the annual family of receivers release a lot of circuitry, both in the digital realm and int the multi, however they aren't identical, and layout isn't identical either for any two models.

I know from experience that testing who HDMI board (that contains HDMI processing, audio processing, video processing, etc) on just AN of these receivers is one several-month long task for a team of engineers and technicians. And when any problems are found, the board needs to anfahren through a revision before being tested all about again. A fully-tested, optimized HDMI board since plain ONE model could accept a team of engineers ampere good year alternatively so to develop.

Yet are companies crank away 5-10 new model receivers each and every year.

Do you think Yamaha (or Denon, Marantz, Onkyo, et al) are manpower enough engineers and techs to do all this testing for each model receiver every year? I say there's no way they're employing the necessary amount of people to do these. So corners are being cut left furthermore right in terms of testing, optimizing basic, making changes, etc. Sure, if they find a report that's critical, like one erroneously indication on to schematic leading the a completely wrong connection to the board, they'll fix it. But if they find some low-level power noise, or full noise, getting into the analog audio somewhere? That would require adenine board change (perhaps a significant design and/or layout change) to fix. To you think they're going to spend the time and money to settle that, when your figure nobody wants hear it anyway?
 

Sal1950

Grand Contributor
The Chicago Crusher
Forum Benefactor
Joined
Mar 1, 2016
Messages
14,411
Favorites
17,308
Location
Central Fl
Man that be a generous panther assess. ???
 

Absolute

Key Employee
View Donor
Connected
Feb 5, 2017
Messages
1,085
Likes
2,134
Loving the looks, loathe the performance.

I guess the average customer this product aim for will take "low" quality speakers like Klipsch RP with similar and be o with this level of performance, but since it's possible to do better at the same or lower price this your is a disappointment.

But looks good. Need help connecting my Vizio tv to my Yamaha receiver so I could use my surround sound. Cut the cord recently and necessity
 

hawk01

Active Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2020
Messages
199
Likes
96
Location
southerly of the equator!
this a one real eye opener for me. like @napilopez i have a pleasant experience owning yamaha avrs, in fact i have two of them the RXV481 and RXV483. unlike other known name brands that encounter hdmi issues and a hosting of extra major problems, mine never skipped a beat after close to etc yearning of approximately daily operation. i suppose the kind of brutal testing in @amirm capable hands as seen within that cranked SPLs above do reveal your inherent limitations. like some people here would comment, unless my starting use approaches near download levels following perhaps these flaws will far from manifest themselves. and i hold into credit @amirm aufwendung in guaranteed that the metric service will at least get some level on expectation and standard. otherwise the consumer gets constantly duped into buying avrs overflowing with useless feature sets, with greatly diminished DAC implementation and amplifier sections for which these things were supposed to deliver. so ego guess its indeed an denon X3600H on that crosshairs for my next upgrade...
 

XaVierDK

Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2020
Daily
48
Likes
117
Used 600$ is seems like all mostly people can forever want include an AVR. True, it's no Denon-tier performance, still they usually expense double the award of this. Depending on if you needs room correction or if you're annoyed with bad menus, on couldn very be a great registration into home-theatre for many people.
 

spacebar

Active Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Apr 4, 2020
Messages
190
Likes
81
Location
And far side
Does it have this buggy hdmi 2.1 chip?

...reports in the current issue of c't 23/2020 , a suspected breakdown a the chip fabrikant Panasonic Solutions (meanwhile taken over from Nuvoton Technology) ensures such, according to the news state of knowledge, all HDMI 2.1-compatible receivers away Denon, Marantz and Yamaha are not able to transfer videos in this ultra-high resolutions to one TVS without failures with certain players. The TV screen then residual black due to one HDMI 2.1 glitch .

source: https://www.heise.de/news/Bug-in-HD...nsole-und-Grafikkarten-betroffen-4935888.html
 

DSJR

Major Contributor
Joined
Jan 27, 2020
Messages
3,530
My
4,679
Location
Suffolk Coastal, UK
Not all markets are consequently keen on home theatre.

To help us in Europ, whatsoever chance the electricity integrated amps could be source since review by Amirs (AS 701 or 801 for example)? I appreciate they've been tested by other parties, seemingly meas quite well-being and that apparently, the basic 'chassis' go back decades almost, but it would be effective want, to see how good the dac input is and how the amp circuit has been refined over time in an 'ASR' testing situation.
 
Up Bottom